Looks dont matter in nature

lurking truecel

lurking truecel

Banned
Joined
Jul 12, 2024
Posts
14,123
Reputation
20,051
If some ugly as tribe came and slaughter the hell out of good looking tribe it would be over. Then they rape the females for kids. No good looks nature will save anything. Its only in a safe environment women are able to care about looks
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: ilikesilenthill2lol, savemebimax, Hexxed and 1 other person
If some ugly as tribe came and slaughter the hell out of good looking tribe it would be over. Then they rape the females for kids. No good looks nature will save anything. Its only in a safe environment women are able to care about looks
Goatis is that you
 
  • +1
Reactions: churmaxxed
If some ugly as tribe came and slaughter the hell out of good looking tribe it would be over. Then they rape the females for kids. No good looks nature will save anything. Its only in a safe environment women are able to care about looks
i like the way u thinking lets just rape tribes in the wild mountains
 
  • +1
Reactions: lurking truecel
If a savage, ugly tribe wiped out a good-looking one and took their women, beauty wouldn’t matter — survival would. In dangerous environments, women can’t afford to pick partners based purely on looks; they need men with strength, resources, and protection.

Up until just a few decades ago, women in most societies had little freedom to choose who they married. For centuries, the men with the most physical power or wealth got the wives. There was no casual hookup culture, and marriage was more about survival than attraction.

Today, things are different. Social media, dating apps, financial independence, and legal protection allow women to freely choose partners based on physical attractiveness. Women have always been drawn to handsome men, but now, for the first time in history, they can actually act on that preference at scale. Apps like Instagram and Tinder make it easy for attractive women to have frequent hookups before they eventually settle down with less conventionally attractive partners for stability.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Survived abortion and lurking truecel
we need to go back, for the sake of my ability to breed
 
  • +1
Reactions: churmaxxed and lurking truecel
If some ugly as tribe came and slaughter the hell out of good looking tribe it would be over. Then they rape the females for kids. No good looks nature will save anything. Its only in a safe environment women are able to care about looks
In the wild women don't get to choose shit
 
  • +1
Reactions: lurking truecel
If a savage, ugly tribe wiped out a good-looking one and took their women, beauty wouldn’t matter — survival would. In dangerous environments, women can’t afford to pick partners based purely on looks; they need men with strength, resources, and protection.

Up until just a few decades ago, women in most societies had little freedom to choose who they married. For centuries, the men with the most physical power or wealth got the wives. There was no casual hookup culture, and marriage was more about survival than attraction.

Today, things are different. Social media, dating apps, financial independence, and legal protection allow women to freely choose partners based on physical attractiveness. Women have always been drawn to handsome men, but now, for the first time in history, they can actually act on that preference at scale. Apps like Instagram and Tinder make it easy for attractive women to have frequent hookups before they eventually settle down with less conventionally attractive partners for stability.
Yea its over
 
  • +1
Reactions: churmaxxed and lurking truecel
  • Love it
Reactions: PSLbbc

Similar threads

D
Replies
16
Views
324
aids
aids
bottleofwater
Replies
2
Views
230
buddhistking
buddhistking
Mansur
Replies
10
Views
200
appondaar
appondaar
Chadmog
Replies
76
Views
884
gigacumster3000
gigacumster3000
higoodboy12309@gmai
Discussion Height is law
Replies
15
Views
387
idealistsynth
idealistsynth

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top