Looks dont matter in nature

lurking truecel

lurking truecel

Good old lurker
Joined
Jul 12, 2024
Posts
18,882
Reputation
29,139
If some ugly as tribe came and slaughter the hell out of good looking tribe it would be over. Then they rape the females for kids. No good looks nature will save anything. Its only in a safe environment women are able to care about looks
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: ilikesilenthill2lol, savemebimax, Deleted member 195819 and 1 other person
If some ugly as tribe came and slaughter the hell out of good looking tribe it would be over. Then they rape the females for kids. No good looks nature will save anything. Its only in a safe environment women are able to care about looks
Goatis is that you
 
  • +1
Reactions: flows5991
If some ugly as tribe came and slaughter the hell out of good looking tribe it would be over. Then they rape the females for kids. No good looks nature will save anything. Its only in a safe environment women are able to care about looks
i like the way u thinking lets just rape tribes in the wild mountains
 
  • +1
Reactions: lurking truecel
If a savage, ugly tribe wiped out a good-looking one and took their women, beauty wouldn’t matter — survival would. In dangerous environments, women can’t afford to pick partners based purely on looks; they need men with strength, resources, and protection.

Up until just a few decades ago, women in most societies had little freedom to choose who they married. For centuries, the men with the most physical power or wealth got the wives. There was no casual hookup culture, and marriage was more about survival than attraction.

Today, things are different. Social media, dating apps, financial independence, and legal protection allow women to freely choose partners based on physical attractiveness. Women have always been drawn to handsome men, but now, for the first time in history, they can actually act on that preference at scale. Apps like Instagram and Tinder make it easy for attractive women to have frequent hookups before they eventually settle down with less conventionally attractive partners for stability.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Survived abortion and lurking truecel
we need to go back, for the sake of my ability to breed
 
  • +1
Reactions: RRM, flows5991 and lurking truecel
If some ugly as tribe came and slaughter the hell out of good looking tribe it would be over. Then they rape the females for kids. No good looks nature will save anything. Its only in a safe environment women are able to care about looks
In the wild women don't get to choose shit
 
  • +1
Reactions: lurking truecel
If a savage, ugly tribe wiped out a good-looking one and took their women, beauty wouldn’t matter — survival would. In dangerous environments, women can’t afford to pick partners based purely on looks; they need men with strength, resources, and protection.

Up until just a few decades ago, women in most societies had little freedom to choose who they married. For centuries, the men with the most physical power or wealth got the wives. There was no casual hookup culture, and marriage was more about survival than attraction.

Today, things are different. Social media, dating apps, financial independence, and legal protection allow women to freely choose partners based on physical attractiveness. Women have always been drawn to handsome men, but now, for the first time in history, they can actually act on that preference at scale. Apps like Instagram and Tinder make it easy for attractive women to have frequent hookups before they eventually settle down with less conventionally attractive partners for stability.
Yea its over
 
  • +1
Reactions: flows5991 and lurking truecel
  • Love it
Reactions: PSLbbc

Similar threads

fakecelstoner
Replies
10
Views
99
fakecelstoner
fakecelstoner
nobody922
Replies
3
Views
91
YUNG YZ999
YUNG YZ999
chrisisthenewclav
Replies
25
Views
154
Lefty Rankin
Lefty Rankin
goodgenetic01
Replies
22
Views
164
goodgenetic01
goodgenetic01
CHRIST_764
Replies
16
Views
124
FiendFiend
FiendFiend

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top