Looks dont matter in nature

lurking truecel

lurking truecel

Fire
Joined
Jul 12, 2024
Posts
15,878
Reputation
23,480
If some ugly as tribe came and slaughter the hell out of good looking tribe it would be over. Then they rape the females for kids. No good looks nature will save anything. Its only in a safe environment women are able to care about looks
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: ilikesilenthill2lol, savemebimax, Hexxed and 1 other person
If some ugly as tribe came and slaughter the hell out of good looking tribe it would be over. Then they rape the females for kids. No good looks nature will save anything. Its only in a safe environment women are able to care about looks
Goatis is that you
 
  • +1
Reactions: flows5991
If some ugly as tribe came and slaughter the hell out of good looking tribe it would be over. Then they rape the females for kids. No good looks nature will save anything. Its only in a safe environment women are able to care about looks
i like the way u thinking lets just rape tribes in the wild mountains
 
  • +1
Reactions: lurking truecel
If a savage, ugly tribe wiped out a good-looking one and took their women, beauty wouldn’t matter — survival would. In dangerous environments, women can’t afford to pick partners based purely on looks; they need men with strength, resources, and protection.

Up until just a few decades ago, women in most societies had little freedom to choose who they married. For centuries, the men with the most physical power or wealth got the wives. There was no casual hookup culture, and marriage was more about survival than attraction.

Today, things are different. Social media, dating apps, financial independence, and legal protection allow women to freely choose partners based on physical attractiveness. Women have always been drawn to handsome men, but now, for the first time in history, they can actually act on that preference at scale. Apps like Instagram and Tinder make it easy for attractive women to have frequent hookups before they eventually settle down with less conventionally attractive partners for stability.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Survived abortion and lurking truecel
we need to go back, for the sake of my ability to breed
 
  • +1
Reactions: RRM, flows5991 and lurking truecel
If some ugly as tribe came and slaughter the hell out of good looking tribe it would be over. Then they rape the females for kids. No good looks nature will save anything. Its only in a safe environment women are able to care about looks
In the wild women don't get to choose shit
 
  • +1
Reactions: lurking truecel
If a savage, ugly tribe wiped out a good-looking one and took their women, beauty wouldn’t matter — survival would. In dangerous environments, women can’t afford to pick partners based purely on looks; they need men with strength, resources, and protection.

Up until just a few decades ago, women in most societies had little freedom to choose who they married. For centuries, the men with the most physical power or wealth got the wives. There was no casual hookup culture, and marriage was more about survival than attraction.

Today, things are different. Social media, dating apps, financial independence, and legal protection allow women to freely choose partners based on physical attractiveness. Women have always been drawn to handsome men, but now, for the first time in history, they can actually act on that preference at scale. Apps like Instagram and Tinder make it easy for attractive women to have frequent hookups before they eventually settle down with less conventionally attractive partners for stability.
Yea its over
 
  • +1
Reactions: flows5991 and lurking truecel
  • Love it
Reactions: PSLbbc

Similar threads

G
Replies
9
Views
140
grymtzz
G
whateverr
Replies
7
Views
81
Quicksand
Quicksand
BlameGeneticsNotMe
Replies
6
Views
128
BlameGeneticsNotMe
BlameGeneticsNotMe
Changmentum
Replies
2
Views
68
rayhuul
rayhuul
PEENO08
Replies
65
Views
599
Saint
Saint

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top