veilzipork
Mtn
- Joined
- May 15, 2025
- Posts
- 19
- Reputation
- 14
Here’s my take on this theory
Introduction:
Looksmaxxing, on the surface, appears to be a self-improvement movement centered on grooming, fitness, skincare, and cosmetic enhancement. In truth, it is a hyper-engineered psychological operation designed to fracture self-worth, target neurodivergent vulnerability, and ultimately fracture social cohesion—particularly among men. This paper proposes that the looksmaxxing movement is not an organic subculture, but a strategic psyop, possibly propagated or encouraged by intelligence apparatuses like the CIA, to destabilize populations through aesthetic obsession and identity disintegration.
1. What is Looksmaxxing (and Why It’s Dangerous):
Looksmaxxing is marketed as “leveling up your appearance”—a grindset for your face and body. But beneath the skincare and jawline tips is a relentless assault on the self. It promotes comparison culture, self-hatred, and a belief that physical flaws equal worthlessness. People end up stuck in cycles of harsh self-comparison, chasing extreme routines, and obsessing over tiny details like the angle of their eyes or the shape of their cheeks—constantly rating themselves and feeling like projects that need fixing.
Far from empowering, it destroys self-esteem, especially among vulnerable users. And when your self-worth is shattered, your worldview is warped. You’re no longer a person seeking connection or purpose—you’re a statistic chasing symmetry, easy to manipulate, sell to, and divide.
2. The Target: Autistic Men – Why Them?
The primary victims of looksmaxxing propaganda are autistic men and socially isolated individuals. Why?
3. The Psyop Agenda: Control Through Division
Looksmaxxing is not about beauty—it’s about division.
Because it’s “divide and conquer” 101. If men are busy hating themselves, rating each other, and chasing impossible ideals, they aren’t building community, resisting oppression, or challenging power structures.
4. The Bigger Picture: Manufactured Insecurity as Social Control
This isn’t just about looks. It’s a microcosm of a larger system where problems are manufactured to keep people distracted, divided, and docile.
• Governments don’t need to silence you if they can make you silence yourself out of shame.
Looksmaxxing floods the mind with one message: you are not enough. And once that belief takes hold, you’ll buy anything, follow anyone, and never look upward—only inward, in hatred.
It’s about distraction and identity destabilization. A person obsessed with fixing their nose or beard line isn’t organizing or resisting. They’re scrolling, rating, and consuming.
The end goal isn’t just insecurity—it’s control. Not to benefit the elites’ lifestyle, but to keep you exhausted, pacified, and too atomized to realize the cage you’re in.
Looksmaxxing is a virus disguised as a self-help guide. And those behind it don’t want better skin—they want a broken society that never looks up from the mirror.
Looksmaxxing erodes masculine identity at its root. When your entire worldview is based on how attractive you appear to others, your core values get hijacked. You begin seeing yourself through the eyes of other men—competing, comparing, seeking validation.
This doesn’t just warp self-esteem. It changes your orientation. When you’re obsessively rating male beauty, watching physiques, and craving external affirmation from male-dominated communities, you slowly rewire your attraction pathways. It’s not accidental—it’s behavioral conditioning.
The CIA’s interest? Simple: if you distort gender norms and destabilize sexual identity, you disrupt family structures, generational values, and resistance-building traditions. The more confused and fragmented the population is, the easier they are to pacify.
If masculinity is neutered, and if men are feminized or derailed into identity crises, they won’t stand up to authority. They’ll be too busy standing in front of the mirror or defending their new identity in online battles.
6. The Hidden Racial Agenda: Breeding Hatred in Dating
Another toxic side effect: racial resentment and dating bias. The looksmaxxing world trains people to see attractiveness through Eurocentric, algorithm-driven filters—light skin, narrow features, “high SMV” phenotypes.
This creates hyper-selectivity and exclusion. Users start to genuinely believe people of their own race—or other races—aren’t worth dating unless they meet whitewashed standards.
As people fixate on “dating up” based on looks, they stop seeing others as potential partners and instead view them as commodities. This fuels resentment, racism, and inceldom, all wrapped in a sheet of self-loathing.
And the CIA benefits here too: divide people across race lines, weaponize beauty standards, and create friction between communities that should be unified. If you’re angry at women from your own race, or blaming immigrants for your dating struggles, you’re not blaming capitalism, power structures, or elite control. You’re exactly where they want you—misdirected, bitter, and alone.
Introduction:
Looksmaxxing, on the surface, appears to be a self-improvement movement centered on grooming, fitness, skincare, and cosmetic enhancement. In truth, it is a hyper-engineered psychological operation designed to fracture self-worth, target neurodivergent vulnerability, and ultimately fracture social cohesion—particularly among men. This paper proposes that the looksmaxxing movement is not an organic subculture, but a strategic psyop, possibly propagated or encouraged by intelligence apparatuses like the CIA, to destabilize populations through aesthetic obsession and identity disintegration.
1. What is Looksmaxxing (and Why It’s Dangerous):
Looksmaxxing is marketed as “leveling up your appearance”—a grindset for your face and body. But beneath the skincare and jawline tips is a relentless assault on the self. It promotes comparison culture, self-hatred, and a belief that physical flaws equal worthlessness. People end up stuck in cycles of harsh self-comparison, chasing extreme routines, and obsessing over tiny details like the angle of their eyes or the shape of their cheeks—constantly rating themselves and feeling like projects that need fixing.
Far from empowering, it destroys self-esteem, especially among vulnerable users. And when your self-worth is shattered, your worldview is warped. You’re no longer a person seeking connection or purpose—you’re a statistic chasing symmetry, easy to manipulate, sell to, and divide.
2. The Target: Autistic Men – Why Them?
The primary victims of looksmaxxing propaganda are autistic men and socially isolated individuals. Why?
- Autistic people often experience social alienation, low self-worth, and a desperate desire for rules or systems to “fix” their lives. Looksmaxxing offers a seductive formula: change your face, change your life.
- The CIA and other agencies historically exploit vulnerable minds—just look at MKUltra, or experiments on psychiatric patients. They target the neurodivergent not out of malice, but because they are programmable.
- Autistic men are data-driven, literal, hyper-analytical—they will internalize every flaw, believe in numeric beauty ratings, and radicalize themselves without needing any external force.
3. The Psyop Agenda: Control Through Division
Looksmaxxing is not about beauty—it’s about division.
- It fractures male identity, turning brotherhood into ranking, self-loathing, and performative insecurity.
- It quietly encourages sexual disorientation—not by persuasion, but by erasing male confidence and identity, making people more susceptible to anything that gives them fleeting validation.
- It isolates autistic individuals from neurotypical peers by obsessing over aesthetics, pushing them into echo chambers.
Because it’s “divide and conquer” 101. If men are busy hating themselves, rating each other, and chasing impossible ideals, they aren’t building community, resisting oppression, or challenging power structures.
4. The Bigger Picture: Manufactured Insecurity as Social Control
This isn’t just about looks. It’s a microcosm of a larger system where problems are manufactured to keep people distracted, divided, and docile.
• Governments don’t need to silence you if they can make you silence yourself out of shame.
- They don’t need to disband movements if they can make people self-implode over their jawline.
- They don’t need to ban rebellion if they can sell you $60 serums and filters that keep you chasing a face you’ll never achieve.
Looksmaxxing floods the mind with one message: you are not enough. And once that belief takes hold, you’ll buy anything, follow anyone, and never look upward—only inward, in hatred.
It’s about distraction and identity destabilization. A person obsessed with fixing their nose or beard line isn’t organizing or resisting. They’re scrolling, rating, and consuming.
The end goal isn’t just insecurity—it’s control. Not to benefit the elites’ lifestyle, but to keep you exhausted, pacified, and too atomized to realize the cage you’re in.
Looksmaxxing is a virus disguised as a self-help guide. And those behind it don’t want better skin—they want a broken society that never looks up from the mirror.
5. How It Erases Identity: Why It Turns You Gay
Looksmaxxing erodes masculine identity at its root. When your entire worldview is based on how attractive you appear to others, your core values get hijacked. You begin seeing yourself through the eyes of other men—competing, comparing, seeking validation.
This doesn’t just warp self-esteem. It changes your orientation. When you’re obsessively rating male beauty, watching physiques, and craving external affirmation from male-dominated communities, you slowly rewire your attraction pathways. It’s not accidental—it’s behavioral conditioning.
The CIA’s interest? Simple: if you distort gender norms and destabilize sexual identity, you disrupt family structures, generational values, and resistance-building traditions. The more confused and fragmented the population is, the easier they are to pacify.
If masculinity is neutered, and if men are feminized or derailed into identity crises, they won’t stand up to authority. They’ll be too busy standing in front of the mirror or defending their new identity in online battles.
6. The Hidden Racial Agenda: Breeding Hatred in Dating
Another toxic side effect: racial resentment and dating bias. The looksmaxxing world trains people to see attractiveness through Eurocentric, algorithm-driven filters—light skin, narrow features, “high SMV” phenotypes.
This creates hyper-selectivity and exclusion. Users start to genuinely believe people of their own race—or other races—aren’t worth dating unless they meet whitewashed standards.
As people fixate on “dating up” based on looks, they stop seeing others as potential partners and instead view them as commodities. This fuels resentment, racism, and inceldom, all wrapped in a sheet of self-loathing.
And the CIA benefits here too: divide people across race lines, weaponize beauty standards, and create friction between communities that should be unified. If you’re angry at women from your own race, or blaming immigrants for your dating struggles, you’re not blaming capitalism, power structures, or elite control. You’re exactly where they want you—misdirected, bitter, and alone.
