Sachlichkeit
Iron
- Joined
- May 11, 2025
- Posts
- 183
- Reputation
- 122
kk
we are blasting gear for dimorphism, not muscle gain. Increase in bone density, redistribution of facial and body fat, acceleration of age related factors such as facial hair growth while trying to mitigate the aging effects of androgens. The increase in muscle density is good, but no muscle + good skeletal frame "mogs" lots of muscle and poor frame
You have been taught to cycle supraphysiological doses of gear in short term bursts in order to maximize our growth window, (roughly ages 14-24.)
The problem is that gear not only masculinizes but also induces premature aging on a cellular level. So even if you mitigate some surface level age related side effect with an anti aging protocol, we are still quite literally taking years off our lifespan.
A standard beginner steroid cycle is probably going to take 1-2 years off your life
Chronic use will be 5-10
Extreme abuse will take an estimated minimum 20 years off your life.
Obviously we can run ancillaries and other drugs to reduce these effects (to an upwards of 60-70%) but people on org already know about things like ghk-cu.
SO. We run lower dose, longer cycles. The effects of drugs are not a linear scale. If I do 12iu hgh it won't produce double the effect of 6IU as the effectiveness plateaus at around 6-8. Its the same with cycle duration. If you blast tren you will see large results fast but will also see more side effects and more longer-term, difficult to reverse damage. Large amounts of gear will also close your growth plates faster through e2 rebound (if not mitigated using AIs) and by prematurely aging the cells in growth plates. So you will grow taller faster, but won't grow as tall as you would have on a lower, longer term dose.
Low dose, longterm use of Anavar in children resulted in an increase in height velocity that outpaced the rate at which their bones age.
High dose resulted in a similar increase of height velocity (about double) but aged bones 13% faster compared to the low dose study.
Also remember that growth is limited by time. Your body can't use a supraphysiological amount of tren in a short amount of time as efficient as it can use a lower dose over a longer period.
If you are nearing the end of your growth, its probably best to blast gear if you aren't running 13 different anti aging drugs & giving yourself developmental brain damage by nuking E2 with AI's.
If you have 2-3 or even just 1 year of solid growth left you should try to run low doses as long as possible with PCT's and medical tests inbetween.
edit; not all androgens are created equal. Figure out which ones have detrimental effects longterm and adjust accordingly. Most of the viable information we have on gear comes from short term supraphysiological dose studies so less is known about indefinite use
TLDR; Lower dose longer duration cycles > high dose low duration cycles
we are blasting gear for dimorphism, not muscle gain. Increase in bone density, redistribution of facial and body fat, acceleration of age related factors such as facial hair growth while trying to mitigate the aging effects of androgens. The increase in muscle density is good, but no muscle + good skeletal frame "mogs" lots of muscle and poor frame
You have been taught to cycle supraphysiological doses of gear in short term bursts in order to maximize our growth window, (roughly ages 14-24.)
The problem is that gear not only masculinizes but also induces premature aging on a cellular level. So even if you mitigate some surface level age related side effect with an anti aging protocol, we are still quite literally taking years off our lifespan.
A standard beginner steroid cycle is probably going to take 1-2 years off your life
Chronic use will be 5-10
Extreme abuse will take an estimated minimum 20 years off your life.
Obviously we can run ancillaries and other drugs to reduce these effects (to an upwards of 60-70%) but people on org already know about things like ghk-cu.
SO. We run lower dose, longer cycles. The effects of drugs are not a linear scale. If I do 12iu hgh it won't produce double the effect of 6IU as the effectiveness plateaus at around 6-8. Its the same with cycle duration. If you blast tren you will see large results fast but will also see more side effects and more longer-term, difficult to reverse damage. Large amounts of gear will also close your growth plates faster through e2 rebound (if not mitigated using AIs) and by prematurely aging the cells in growth plates. So you will grow taller faster, but won't grow as tall as you would have on a lower, longer term dose.
Low dose, longterm use of Anavar in children resulted in an increase in height velocity that outpaced the rate at which their bones age.
High dose resulted in a similar increase of height velocity (about double) but aged bones 13% faster compared to the low dose study.
Also remember that growth is limited by time. Your body can't use a supraphysiological amount of tren in a short amount of time as efficient as it can use a lower dose over a longer period.
If you are nearing the end of your growth, its probably best to blast gear if you aren't running 13 different anti aging drugs & giving yourself developmental brain damage by nuking E2 with AI's.
If you have 2-3 or even just 1 year of solid growth left you should try to run low doses as long as possible with PCT's and medical tests inbetween.
edit; not all androgens are created equal. Figure out which ones have detrimental effects longterm and adjust accordingly. Most of the viable information we have on gear comes from short term supraphysiological dose studies so less is known about indefinite use
TLDR; Lower dose longer duration cycles > high dose low duration cycles
Last edited:
