noobs
Kraken
- Joined
- Sep 8, 2023
- Posts
- 4,971
- Reputation
- 7,654
The reason you don’t assassinate opposition is because it will cause the opponents will to be stronger, because you do not face the opponent, but his will.
As a leader, you are either a prince with a body of servants who prop you into power, or a body of barons to who you prop and they give you royalty to them in return. The first is of the French and the second is of the Turk.
The barons hold the king to the highest regard without caring about the smaller offices of power, while the king reigns in autocracy.
George Lincoln Rockwell had no successor, or replacement, and since the paramilitaries who gave loyalty to GLR had no possible retaliatory measures, there was no reason not to assassinate GLR.
For you to form a movement under an opponents rule, you must have a para political-militaristic body of which the government cannot dissolve from retaliatory actions in any context of that the opposition has a unreplaceable on the keys and/or lock to their power.
As a leader, you are either a prince with a body of servants who prop you into power, or a body of barons to who you prop and they give you royalty to them in return. The first is of the French and the second is of the Turk.
The barons hold the king to the highest regard without caring about the smaller offices of power, while the king reigns in autocracy.
George Lincoln Rockwell had no successor, or replacement, and since the paramilitaries who gave loyalty to GLR had no possible retaliatory measures, there was no reason not to assassinate GLR.
For you to form a movement under an opponents rule, you must have a para political-militaristic body of which the government cannot dissolve from retaliatory actions in any context of that the opposition has a unreplaceable on the keys and/or lock to their power.
Last edited:
