D
Deleted member 23558
God make my neurotransmitters great inc
- Joined
- Nov 3, 2022
- Posts
- 64,844
- Reputation
- 91,139
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
westeners already had the genes to grow tall, the hunter gatherers in their part of the world were comparable to modern men.Western food has that human growth factors. It seems these heights were how the ancient world was, everyone were manlets
westeners already had the genes to grow tall, the hunter gatherers in their part of the world were comparable to modern men.
no such case in india.
brutal 1.56cm average height for males
if u want to make the argument westerners were tallers than peoples in other regiosn thats fine but they also were manlet height, 5 7 would have been considered taller than average in ancient times, its really interesting when u look at most indians, theoretically they should be the same height as their ancestors or family but for most who were born in the west its like they suddenly get to the same average height as everyone else at around 5 9, my parents are 5 4 and 5 7.westeners already had the genes to grow tall, the hunter gatherers in their part of the world were comparable to modern men.
no such case in india.
height was stunted during the middle ages, hunter gathers in western europe were quite tall.if u want to make the argument westerners were tallers than peoples in other regiosn thats fine but they also were manlet height, 5 7 would have been considered taller than average in ancient times
I wish it was implemented in the west @Dr. Bludy
Steppe genes was the main driver of height. Upper caste North Indians with higher steppe were height mogging Brit’s in 1900 while living under subjugation and poverty.height was stunted during the middle ages, hunter gathers in western europe were quite tall.
palaeolithic europeans were taller than indians living in the west.
There was actually a study done on this. Indians born and raised in the west were about as tall as brits. Once again proving that diet is clearly the reason for height disparity.height was stunted during the middle ages, hunter gathers in western europe were quite tall.
palaeolithic europeans were taller than indians living in the west.
wouldn't be surprised if brits start shrinking again with how shit their diet is.Steppe genes was the main driver of height. Upper caste North Indians with higher steppe were height mogging Brit’s in 1900 while living under subjugation and poverty.
Height is more about not being genetically capped rather than about being genetically blessedThere was actually a study done on this. Indians born and raised in the west were about as tall as brits. Once again proving that diet is clearly the reason for height disparity.
View attachment 2454187
It's not just the genes: Ethnic Indians grow taller in the UK
Despite impressive rates of economic growth, India's children and adults do not grow as tall as they could.www.google.com
There's barely any difference between second gen ethnics and whites.
United States – Asian Americans173.2 cm (5 ft 8 in)
United States – Hispanic and Latino Americans172.0 cm (5 ft 7 1⁄2 in)
United States – Non-Hispanic whites178 cm (5 ft 10 in)
United States – African Americans175.4 cm (5 ft 9 1⁄2 in)13.4 cm (5 ft 4 1⁄2 in)
All my grandparents are from hyderabad you tamil dalit.
What is a caste?@Orc @justinzayn @crisis @whiteislandpill @PrinceLuenLeoncur
I think a few ethnicities are predisposed to growing taller otherwise we wouldn't have nordics growing taller than meds but I still belive diet is the king when it comes to height.Height is more about not being genetically capped rather than about being genetically blessed
What is a caste?
the tallest were 5 9 from what im reading some sources saying 5 6, this makes sense, how tall do u think they were?height was stunted during the middle ages, hunter gathers in western europe were quite tall.
palaeolithic europeans were taller than indians living in the west.
true average was probably 6'' magnum frame, cant count the slave cucks, ethnics of that timeif u want to make the argument westerners were tallers than peoples in other regiosn thats fine but they also were manlet height, 5 7 would have been considered taller than average in ancient times, its really interesting when u look at most indians, theoretically they should be the same height as their ancestors or family but for most who were born in the west its like they suddenly get to the same average height as everyone else at around 5 9, my parents are 5 4 and 5 7.
Even the vikings hit 6 feet rarely and they were known for being taller, u don't read much about history do u? Alexander was around 5 6/7 and so was Julius Caesar, I dont think u realize what ur implying if the ethnics were made into slaves, this would imply that the people who became slaves or the indigenous peoples were the real creators of already existing kingdoms and civilizations in that region and the barbarian simply took over something already created, a similar predicament to the whole aryan invasion stuff for India, the same implication comes around that the undesirable low iq ethnics somehow build a super advanced ancient civilization for the time that lasted 2000 years. Make up ur mind for both, either these were 2 different races or peoples, which means the ethnics were the ones in both that build the advanced civilizations, or they were essentially similar people.true average was probably 6'' magnum frame, cant count the slave cucks, ethnics of that time
We would be kings innitI wish it was implemented in the west @Dr. Bludy
Stfu curry nigger
Rajputs havent mixed as well i think all warrior castes (especially warrior gotras and clans) consistently average 5'10 on the male sidetoday only sikhs in general who are 5ft9/10/11cm on average cuz other pure high caste hindus have either converted or mixed with random indians
this is why sikhs are the tallest ethnic in whole mena and asia
its because in the west we have superior diet and less malnourishmentif u want to make the argument westerners were tallers than peoples in other regiosn thats fine but they also were manlet height, 5 7 would have been considered taller than average in ancient times, its really interesting when u look at most indians, theoretically they should be the same height as their ancestors or family but for most who were born in the west its like they suddenly get to the same average height as everyone else at around 5 9, my parents are 5 4 and 5 7.
*Punjabis and only from a very specific region. Also the Dinka, lebanese druze, jews are the tallest in MENA regions not Punjabis.today only sikhs in general who are 5ft9/10/11cm on average cuz other pure high caste hindus have either converted or mixed with random indians
this is why sikhs are the tallest ethnic in whole mena and asia
Yeah cause GMO abnormal halfbreed mutation foods riddled with chemicals and pesticides are indeed superior.its because in the west we have superior diet and less malnourishment
so youre arguing that curries have a better diet than westerners?Yeah cause GMO abnormal halfbreed mutation foods riddled with chemicals and pesticides are indeed superior.
disregard other comment, bigger doesn't always mean better, u can give animals all the growth hormones u want to make them fatter and yes u will be able to feed more people but this does not mean it is purer and there are other problems that arise from these foods than just the short term benefits u see from foods like this, in terms of mood, holistic benefits, and in all likelihood cancers and autism that are prob a result from these foods.so youre arguing that curries have a better diet than westerners?
no matter your opinion, virtually all anthropologists agree this is why second generation immigrants are always taller (western diet)
its just so happens that only sikhs have a specific region*Punjabis and only from a very specific region. Also the Dinka, lebanese druze, jews are the tallest in MENA regions not Punjabis.
you also have to differentiate between eu and usdisregard other comment, bigger doesn't always mean better, u can give animals all the growth hormones u want to make them fatter and yes u will be able to feed more people but this does not mean it is purer and there are other problems that arise from these foods than just the short term benefits u see from foods like this, in terms of mood, holistic benefits, and in all likelihood cancers and autism that are prob a result from these foods.
Even the vikings hit 6 feet rarely and they were known for being taller, u don't read much about history do u? Alexander was around 5 6/7 and so was Julius Caesar, I dont think u realize what ur implying if the ethnics were made into slaves, this would imply that the people who became slaves or the indigenous peoples were the real creators of already existing kingdoms and civilizations in that region and the barbarian simply took over something already created, a similar predicament to the whole aryan invasion stuff for India, the same implication comes around that the undesirable low iq ethnics somehow build a super advanced ancient civilization for the time that lasted 2000 years. Make up ur mind for both, either these were 2 different races or peoples, which means the ethnics were the ones in both that build the advanced civilizations, or they were essentially similar people.
yeah eu is smart about that they def have better quality foods compared to US but they 2 will still have a similar sorts of thing going on in their own way, US should adopt the same sorts of regulations.you also have to differentiate between eu and us
eu is much more strict with these things
This steppe cope doesn't make sense at all. Indus valley people were one of the tallest if not the tallest in the ancient world and they were dravidian like people. It just depends on ur individual genes and nutritionSteppe genes was the main driver of height. Upper caste North Indians with higher steppe were height mogging Brit’s in 1900 while living under subjugation and poverty.
Yea but thats because certain south Asiian hunter gatherers were actually pretty tall, taller than the Iranian neolithic . Steppe people were much taller than SAHG thoThis steppe cope doesn't make sense at all. Indus valley people were one of the tallest if not the tallest in the ancient world and they were dravidian like people. It just depends on ur individual genes and nutrition
Is this data still accurate?