Masseter growth will actually make your jawline less deifned

JeanneDArcAlter

JeanneDArcAlter

Banned
Joined
Nov 6, 2024
Posts
27,300
Reputation
43,486
Untitled15 20250101001221
 
dnr water
 
  • +1
Reactions: Sean o' Tist
1735661733330
 
  • +1
Reactions: punanslayer123
Dnr retarded kindergarten drawings
RETARD
 
  • Ugh..
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 59278 and Deleted member 69082
Fuck nigga I barely understand this
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 69082
wider jaw is better than a narrow angular one.

just be low bf and it looks good anyway
 
  • +1
  • WTF
Reactions: SteveRogers, averagenormie, diditeverbegin and 1 other person
  • +1
Reactions: diditeverbegin and Deleted member 69082
At what cost tho
 
Explain then high iq
Imagine a platform thats over another platform,
like so
Screenshot 20250101 002151 1

now imagine a cloth covering the top of both. Put a block underneath the right edge of the top line, the cloth scretches around the block, and the region of the cloth thats over the divergence of the two lines becomes less steep and more gradual (we could say it becomes more horiontal than it does vertical in this specific scenario)
 
  • JFL
Reactions: diditeverbegin and appeal
Imagine a platform thats over another platform,
like so
View attachment 3393853
now imagine a cloth covering the top of both. Put a block underneath the right edge of the top line, the cloth scretches around the block, and the region of the cloth thats over the divergence of the two lines becomes less steep and more gradual (we could say it becomes more horiontal than it does vertical in this specific scenario)
@appeal what is this dude talking about lol?
 
  • JFL
Reactions: diditeverbegin, Deleted member 71543 and appeal
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: yex, diditeverbegin and Deleted member 69082
@appeal what is this dude talking about lol?
The state of .org
cloths? clothes? platforms?
seriously idk what’s going on tbh.

Room temperature IQ is probably an over statement for this guy, freezing point of water IQ seems more reasonable.
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: diditeverbegin and Deleted member 69082
The state of .org
cloths? clothes? platforms?
seriously idk what’s going on tbh.

Room temperature IQ is probably an over statement for this guy, freezing point of water IQ seems more reasonable.
You cannot play chess with a pigeon it will knock over the pieces and strut around as if it has won
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: yex and Deleted member 69082
Do u believe you'll get good results?
It definitely works 100% I can say that

It just depends on the frequency and commitment.

But I’m waiting for months since I can give a more efficient verdict on the results and procedures involved to make it successful.

Hopefully I’ll have more hooding then as well
 
  • +1
Reactions: vernier
You cannot play chess with a pigeon it will knock over the pieces and strut around as if it has won
Nigga is a philosopher or some shit. Bro is playing chess with a fucking pigeon. My brain is hurting.

@Thebuffdon
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: diditeverbegin and Deleted member 69082
  • JFL
Reactions: appeal
Nigga is a philosopher or some shit. Bro is playing chess with a fucking pigeon. My brain is hurting.

@Thebuffdon
Fuck nigga now in my mind I just have a replay of a fucking pigeon just strutting around on a chess board like an autist
 
It definitely works 100% I can say that

It just depends on the frequency and commitment.

But I’m waiting for months since I can give a more efficient verdict on the results and procedures involved to make it successful.

Hopefully I’ll have more hooding then as well
Have you tried stopping and seeing if results stay.

i did it when i joined in 2022 (different account) but fucked up cos i caused an extra crease on one eye. after time it’s gone back to normal which is why im asking. you may need to do maintenance pulling every so often to keep results idk.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 69082
Fuck nigga now in my mind I just have a replay of a fucking pigeon just strutting around on a chess board like an autist
i’m thinking how tf a pigeon is moving a fucking chess rn. don’t think they can pick shit up? oh shit maybe their beak or something. He is too high iq for us.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 69082
i’m thinking how tf a pigeon is moving a fucking chess rn. don’t think they can pick shit up? oh shit maybe their beak or something. He is too high iq for us.
Its incapable of even playing chess in the first place
Much like how a stupid person is incapable of engaging in the argument in the first place
 
  • JFL
  • Love it
Reactions: yex and Deleted member 69082
Ive realized my premise of the skin not growing in response is prolly false but these ppl are still stupid for not being able to understand this
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 69082
Its incapable of even playing chess in the first place
Much like how a stupid person is incapable of engaging in the argument in the first place
whose arguing nigga.

your thread is water (commonly known) muscle is round, bone is sharp.

Brad pitt, Tom welling have giga masseters, and they have no jaw angularity, just width. Up to you to decide is a rounder but wider jaw is better than a narrower and more angular jaw.

I don’t disagree with your thread, larger masseter = less angular.
 
  • +1
Reactions: SteveRogers and diditeverbegin
whose arguing nigga.

your thread is water (commonly known) muscle is round, bone is sharp.

Brad pitt, Tom welling have giga masseters, and they have no jaw angularity, just width. Up to you to decide is a rounder but wider jaw is better than a narrower and more angular jaw.

I don’t disagree with your thread, larger masseter = less angular.
Its not just that the masseters make the jaw become less sharp ignoring the neck, it becomes less sharp at the divergence between the jaw and the neck as well

English isnt my first language
So i dont know how to describe it
 
  • +1
Reactions: yex
Its not just that the masseters make the jaw become less sharp ignoring the neck, it becomes less sharp at the divergence between the jaw and the neck as well

English isnt my first language
So i dont know how to describe it
I don’t see how this is a problem since you can and should train neck.
 
  • +1
Reactions: SteveRogers
New fear unlocked 😢
 
  • +1
Reactions: JeanneDArcAlter
I don’t see how this is a problem since you can and should train neck.
I sound retarded since i cant explain my point well
Trianing neck will make it even worse there will be less divergence between the jaw and the neck
I.e imagine for whatever reaosn you want wider zygos. Making your jaw wider will not help at all, infact itll do the opposite in terms of the ratio
 
I sound retarded since i cant explain my point well
Trianing neck will make it even worse there will be less divergence between the jaw and the neck
you don’t want divergence. you want neck to be almost as wide as jaw
 
Have you tried stopping and seeing if results stay.

i did it when i joined in 2022 (different account) but fucked up cos i caused an extra crease on one eye. after time it’s gone back to normal which is why im asking. you may need to do maintenance pulling every so often to keep results idk.
Yeh I’m guessing it’s not permanent but I don’t wanna risk it

I got the crease you just need to push through it. Also the crease is technically what causes the hooding effect in the first place, for different types of Hunter eyes.

The crease can’t be diminished because your desired zero UEE / hooding eye archetype is determined by the crease which is caused through the method

A4DE7F5A 7606 4832 820C 1D701D5B7479


Tom cruises eyes have a slight visible crease from the side profile (more) but from the front also:

4F0D838D FB1C 43CC A013 E5F9737A1A6E


This is due to his underlying orbital bone structure but this is the type of Hunter eye area you can emulate with eyelid pulling, because it emulates the visible crease which is developed from pulling your upper eyelid down.

An example of the opposite would be for instance:


Purely caused by the underlying orbital structure you will obviously never achieve this type of eye area through eyelid pulling, because of how the hooding is distributed around the upper eyelid.

@vernier the type of eye area you should and aim to develop with this method is something akin to this:

F5D32D1E 74F1 4313 B450 9ADEB918D723


As you can see visible UEE below the upper eyelid but it’s covered by hooding which is simulated , similarly to what an eyelid pulling protocol is capable of producing, where it doesn’t completely cover the UEE but it’s visible mostly only towards the outer canthus and inner canthus, as you can see from above.

This is what you can expect to achieve (obviously I’ll make the full thread at some point) but I achieved a similar eye area to this with less hooding (because I haven’t done it for long enough yet)

I started out with this much UEE:

E3C67A29 1F4D 4D1A 9A28 CD096FB30FE1


Nuked 90% of it through pulling so far over like 6 months or so
 

Attachments

  • EFF1A1CA-519E-4729-80BD-EEF35DDCA4A4.jpeg
    EFF1A1CA-519E-4729-80BD-EEF35DDCA4A4.jpeg
    14.8 KB · Views: 0
  • +1
Reactions: appeal and vernier
Yeh I’m guessing it’s not permanent but I don’t wanna risk it

I got the crease you just need to push through it. Also the crease is technically what causes the hooding effect in the first place, for different types of Hunter eyes.

The crease can’t be diminished because your desired zero UEE / hooding eye archetype is determined by the crease which is caused through the method

View attachment 3393940

Tom cruises eyes have a slight visible crease from the side profile (more) but from the front also:

View attachment 3393947

This is due to his underlying orbital bone structure but this is the type of Hunter eye area you can emulate with eyelid pulling, because it emulates the visible crease which is developed from pulling your upper eyelid down.

An example of the opposite would be for instance:


Purely caused by the underlying orbital structure you will obviously never achieve this type of eye area through eyelid pulling, because of how the hooding is distributed around the upper eyelid.

@vernier the type of eye area you should and aim to develop with this method is something akin to this:

View attachment 3393949

As you can see visible UEE below the upper eyelid but it’s covered by hooding which is simulated , similarly to what an eyelid pulling protocol is capable of producing, where it doesn’t completely cover the UEE but it’s visible mostly only towards the outer canthus and inner canthus, as you can see from above.

This is what you can expect to achieve (obviously I’ll make the full thread at some point) but I achieved a similar eye area to this with less hooding (because I haven’t done it for long enough yet)

I started out with this much UEE:

View attachment 3393953

Nuked 90% of it through pulling so far over like 6 months or so
Retarded ass Sean o pry photo doesn’t load in the post 🤦‍♂️

@vernier @appeal

Second example is o pry eye area
 
  • +1
Reactions: vernier
you don’t want divergence. you want neck to be almost as wide as jaw
Assuming the growth is on a different horizont plane form the jaw, yes, but its not related to this
Srry for insulting you and @Thebuffdon btw i love everyone no one deserves to get insulted or disrespected
 
Last edited:
  • +1
Reactions: yex
Yeh I’m guessing it’s not permanent but I don’t wanna risk it

I got the crease you just need to push through it. Also the crease is technically what causes the hooding effect in the first place, for different types of Hunter eyes.

The crease can’t be diminished because your desired zero UEE / hooding eye archetype is determined by the crease which is caused through the method

View attachment 3393940

Tom cruises eyes have a slight visible crease from the side profile (more) but from the front also:

View attachment 3393947

This is due to his underlying orbital bone structure but this is the type of Hunter eye area you can emulate with eyelid pulling, because it emulates the visible crease which is developed from pulling your upper eyelid down.

An example of the opposite would be for instance:


Purely caused by the underlying orbital structure you will obviously never achieve this type of eye area through eyelid pulling, because of how the hooding is distributed around the upper eyelid.

@vernier the type of eye area you should and aim to develop with this method is something akin to this:

View attachment 3393949

As you can see visible UEE below the upper eyelid but it’s covered by hooding which is simulated , similarly to what an eyelid pulling protocol is capable of producing, where it doesn’t completely cover the UEE but it’s visible mostly only towards the outer canthus and inner canthus, as you can see from above.

This is what you can expect to achieve (obviously I’ll make the full thread at some point) but I achieved a similar eye area to this with less hooding (because I haven’t done it for long enough yet)

I started out with this much UEE:

View attachment 3393953

Nuked 90% of it through pulling so far over like 6 months or so
Retarded ass Sean o pry photo doesn’t load in the post 🤦‍♂️

@vernier @appeal

Second example is o pry eye area
Damn that's crazy if it had a drastic effect like this ngl. Did u do any unique pulling or is it just normal pulling downwards for a long period of time?
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 69082
Damn that's crazy if it had a drastic effect like this ngl. Did u do any unique pulling or is it just normal pulling downwards for a long period of time?
Watch this space
 
  • +1
Reactions: vernier
You forget that at a certain point, the masseters force the jaw downwards vertically.

ancient, primitive civilizations that used their jaws as a vice and were eating tougher foods had longer ramuses, because their enlarged masseters needed room evolutionarily. Masseter growth isn’t just lateral.
 
No wider jaw is better than narrow angular
 

Similar threads

ketamin
Replies
6
Views
92
skullmog
skullmog
Deusmaximus
Replies
27
Views
699
bpgonnakillme
bpgonnakillme
angrywhiteboy
Replies
1
Views
81
angrywhiteboy
angrywhiteboy
acsensionbeforeover
Replies
3
Views
185
Funnyunenjoyer1
Funnyunenjoyer1
gasstationcart
Replies
20
Views
181
MogsGymMaxx
MogsGymMaxx

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top