cytoplasm
Anti gymcel
- Joined
- Nov 10, 2022
- Posts
- 24,463
- Reputation
- 35,701
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
6.5 but why isn`t he much more famous haven`t seen The White Collar don`t know if its a good or bad show but I rarely see him trending nowadays
Mogs in this ngl.
His harmony isnt good6.75-7PSL insane harmony.
he looms insane in whitw collar, he couldve played better roles like tyrell wellick in mr robot, white collar has its moments but its mostly mid6.5 but why isn`t he much more famous haven`t seen The White Collar don`t know if its a good or bad show but I rarely see him trending nowadays
Also looks like a Looksmaxxed Tom Hanks on 4th pic
You serious bro? It’s up to Chico level.His harmony isnt good
Failed buzz cut test. Normie.Overrated asf, still chad but no idea where the 7 PSL ratings are coming from.
View attachment 2381895
Such a brutal test but so good.Failed buzz cut test. Normie.
my cousin passed it with flying colors this weekSuch a brutal test but so good.
6.75-7PSL insane harmony.
no such thing as harmonyHis harmony isnt good
Please. Elaborate further.no such thing as harmony
Chico would fail a buzzcutSuch a brutal test but so good.
Harmony involves balanced ratios between feautures without any one overpowering the others, while also incorporating a touch of moderation that avoids extremes.no such thing as harmony
It may be wrong but from all the years of looking at models and chads, I would say what users call good harmony is just good features and ratios. The problem is that the rating of features is highly subjective and thus some people consider a jaw like for example Somerhalder's to be very good, meanwhile I disagree with that. Feel free to express an opposite opinion or something to disprove mePlease. Elaborate further.
But these extremes which if I'm understanding you properly mean for example a square big chin, wide jaw etc. are not aesthetic at all featuresHarmony involves balanced ratios between feautures without any one overpowering the others, while also incorporating a touch of moderation that avoids extremes.
I agree. I've seen a lot of people conjure up 'harmony' when they've ran out of ways to explain their preference towards someone (or something). But to my knowledge, harmony is just an alias for 'ratios', like you pointed out. Even then, a lot of people seem to have no idea of what they're talking about when it comes to it.It may be wrong but from all the years of looking at models and chads, I would say what users call good harmony is just good features and ratios. The problem is that the rating of features is highly subjective and thus some people consider a jaw like for example Somerhalder's to be very good, meanwhile I disagree with that. Feel free to express an opposite opinion or something to disprove me
no such thing as harmony
They are aesthetic, but possessing many extremely good features disrupts overall harmony. To maintain the best facial balance, a limit of just 1 extreme standout features is best. As long as it’s not extreme ogre.But these extremes which if I'm understanding you properly mean for example a square big chin, wide jaw etc. are not aesthetic at all features
I remember a morph of him bald he was uglySee his skull with no hair in front.
View attachment 2381974
FINE distinction between balding genetically and not having grown out your hair to hide any failos. For buzz cut test I assume NW 0 with good density and around 1-3mm length on it.I remember a morph of him bald he was ugly
I agree. I've seen a lot of people conjure up 'harmony' when they've ran out of ways to explain their preference towards someone (or something). But to my knowledge, harmony is just an alias for 'ratios', like you pointed out. Even then, a lot of people seem to have no idea of what they're talking about when it comes to it.
Ratios are obviously very important when it comes to facial attractiveness, and AI generated images are a testament to that.
It's just that everyone seems to have their own definition of it. Some say it's ratios but most people consider it some abstract complex term which magically breaks or not your appearance, resorted to when not being able to analyze the face of someone, which is why I made the claim that harmony doesn't exist refering to the latter definition.
Theoretically this sounds plausible but I'm yet to see any case of a person with very good features and having bad "harmony". In all the examples usually posted, it can easily be pointed out by a trained eye which sub-optimal features are causing the bad "harmony".They are aesthetic, but possessing many extremely good features disrupts overall harmony. To maintain the best facial balance, a limit of just 1 extreme standout features is best. As long as it’s not extreme ogre.
Ratios + relation of one bone to anotherno such thing as harmony
See his skull with no hair in front.
View attachment 2381974
Tbh the sides should be way shorter to make a correct prediction on how he would look with a buzzcut. Long sides to short sides make a very big difference especially when ears are noticeable.I remember a morph of him bald he was ugly
He won't appear unattractive, yet his appearance will fall short of his peer who boasts milder facial features that are better balanced. Nobody will be deemed unappealing solely due to having positive facial features, but the optimal outcome involves achieving a more harmonious balance.Theoretically this sounds plausible but I'm yet to see any case of a person with very good features and having bad "harmony". In all the examples usually posted, it can easily be pointed out by a trained eye which sub-optimal features are causing the bad "harmony".
Tbh the sides should be way shorter to make a correct prediction on how he would look with a buzzcut. Long sides to short sides make a very big difference especially when ears are noticeable.
View attachment 2382031View attachment 2382035
Any example of it? I say so because I never seen an actual good exampleHe won't appear unattractive, yet his appearance will fall short of his peer who boasts milder facial features that are better balanced. Nobody will be deemed unappealing solely due to having positive facial features, but the optimal outcome involves achieving a more harmonious balance.
Compare NessmanAny example of it? I say so because I never seen an actual good example
You arent underrating. He has lots of flawsoverrated af, constantly seen as the better version of cavill when he literally just looks like a boneless version of him, 6.25-5 in his prime tbh maybe im underrating
View attachment 2383063
his best pic, looks good here
What are his flaws ?You arent underrating. He has lots of flaws
Any example of it? I say so because I never seen an actual good example
Forhead and mouth primarilyWhat are his flaws ?
non existent midfacial bonesForhead and mouth primarily
Mouth? Looks goodForhead and mouth primarily
Secondary, forehead is the main failo which prevents him from getting in real chad territorynon existent midfacial bones
His mouth is really bad. Even redditors have seen it. Thin lips with no lower maxillary projection. Like @vaseqmoherad said his midface seems undefined and flat to meMouth? Looks good
Secondary, forehead is the main failo which prevents him from getting in real chad territory
This pic gives me young Keanu reeves vibe??? Anyone??See his skull with no hair in front.
View attachment 2381974
Tall skull + exotic eyes pill.This pic gives me young Keanu reeves vibe??? Anyone??