Matt bomer vs lachowski

william2605

william2605

Kraken
Joined
Mar 16, 2023
Posts
3,570
Reputation
2,483

Vs
A3031B3F 4AED 4F62 A194 A01E3B518B52

Why chico has better harmony?despite bomer has ideal ratios ?
 
no harmony for your ageing genetics.

Chico2
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 69862, Deleted member 28904, LooksmaxxHopeful and 3 others
1685820116591
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: redmaxx, IMOGYOU, Deleted member 25550 and 2 others
"Ageing genetics", mf there is not a single person who looks better and better the older they get, this is just called getting old, everyone gets old.
Tom Cruise Age 21



Tom Cruise Age 34



You can look facially better looking as you get older in PSL by early 30s to mid 30s like Tom Cruise, Brad Pitt, and Henry Cavill as examples, but after that. It starts becoming a challenge. I'd say after 40 is when looks start going south in general. Most people however start losing their looks by late 20s.
 
  • +1
Reactions: looksseg, LooksmaxxHopeful, Ken and 2 others
Tom Cruise Age 21



Tom Cruise Age 34



You can look facially better looking as you get older in PSL by early 30s to mid 30s like Tom Cruise, Brad Pitt, and Henry Cavill as exaples, but after that. It starts becoming a challenge. I'd say after 40 is when looks start going south in general. Most people however start losing their looks by late 20s.

Keep in mind Cruise looksmaxxed hard while Chico just partied and slayed. Chico did not descend due to "ageing genetics", he descended because he did nothing to maintain his appearence.
 
  • +1
  • So Sad
Reactions: looksseg, AspiringMogger, Ken and 1 other person
Tom Cruise Age 21



Tom Cruise Age 34



You can look facially better looking as you get older in PSL by early 30s to mid 30s like Tom Cruise, Brad Pitt, and Henry Cavill as examples, but after that. It starts becoming a challenge. I'd say after 40 is when looks start going south in general. Most people however start losing their looks by late 20s.

Bro please ca you explain why chico has better harmony
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 21403, redmaxx, Deleted member 20631 and 4 others
Matt bomer mogs
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 34123
Matt for over 25, Chico for under
 
  • +1
Reactions: hattrick and Ken
Bomer 6.25 psl
Chico 7-7.25
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: IMOGYOU, HarrierDuBois and Leo69
Bro please ca you explain why chico has better harmony
Chico is 8 TRM or 6.4 PSL. Matt Bomer is facially better looking than Chico, but not by a lot. Both around the same 8 TRM range in their prime.
 
Chico is 8 TRM or 6.4 PSL. Matt Bomer is facially better looking than Chico, but not by a lot. Both around the same 8 TRM range in their prime.
Bomer hrmony isn’t good as chicos one
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 24554, looksseg and forevermirin
Chico is 8 TRM or 6.4 PSL. Matt Bomer is facially better looking than Chico, but not by a lot. Both around the same 8 TRM range in their prime.
Not really. Bomer is faliod hard by his mouth and forhead, chico has no such failos
 
  • +1
Reactions: HarrierDuBois
Chico is 8 TRM or 6.4 PSL. Matt Bomer is facially better looking than Chico, but not by a lot. Both around the same 8 TRM range in their prime.
DNRD Bomers eye area is mid as fuck except coloring.
Post 34755 0 1446017787 36874
 
Not really. Bomer is faliod hard by his mouth and forhead, chico has no such failos
And is eyes shape and eyebrows shape aren’t so good
 
  • +1
Reactions: cytoplasm and HarrierDuBois
Bomer hrmony isn’t good as chicos one
It's all about overall attractiveness. Everything matters like jawline and ratios. Not just harmony.

eeab82863867a7e5cf41d2b87abaa427.jpg
14c0874c3ed595dad696980947da8b64--chico-lachowski-francisco-lachowski.jpg


Also, I can find videos of Bomer looking like the photo in motion, but I can't find really videos of Chico looking like the photo on the right. It's like his best photo.
Not really. Bomer is faliod hard by his mouth and forhead, chico has no such failos
When you compare everything all around, and look at motion. It's clear to see who mogs. Bias makes you pick Chico.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 24554 and Ken
Not facially I presume.
facially too, I didn't get much of my masculine bone growth until 25~ and that's not that abnormal for my part of the world, all nords are sort of flat faced aliens until they're late adults.
 
i know why chico has better harmony.
 
It's all about overall attractiveness. Everything matters like jawline and ratios. Not just harmony.

eeab82863867a7e5cf41d2b87abaa427.jpg
14c0874c3ed595dad696980947da8b64--chico-lachowski-francisco-lachowski.jpg


Also, I can find videos of Bomer looking like the photo in motion, but I can't find really videos of Chico looking like the photo on the right. It's like his best photo.

When you compare everything all around, and look at motion. It's clear to see who mogs. Bias makes you pick Chico.
F790896F C1D0 44E3 A3D7 0F41CF6881DB
 
It's all about overall attractiveness. Everything matters like jawline and ratios. Not just harmony.

eeab82863867a7e5cf41d2b87abaa427.jpg
14c0874c3ed595dad696980947da8b64--chico-lachowski-francisco-lachowski.jpg


Also, I can find videos of Bomer looking like the photo in motion, but I can't find really videos of Chico looking like the photo on the right. It's like his best photo.

When you compare everything all around, and look at motion. It's clear to see who mogs. Bias makes you pick Chico.
Im not biased towards anything. Youre probably pheno biased which is one thing bomer has on chico. And face should be seen as one not a sum of its parts. One look at chico and bomer is enough to see who is better looking - lachowski. Mouth is very underrated on this site
 
"Ageing genetics", mf there is not a single person who looks better and better the older they get, this is just called getting old, everyone gets old.
ur back wtf
 
Im not biased towards anything. Youre probably pheno biased which is one thing bomer has on chico. And face should be seen as one not a sum of its parts. One look at chico and bomer is enough to see who is better looking - lachowski. Mouth is very underrated on this site
Vito Basso has way better harmony than Chico. One of the best harmony ever, but you are biased. If I was pheno base, then I would be saying Stephanov over Vito lol.

 
Im not biased towards anything. Youre probably pheno biased which is one thing bomer has on chico. And face should be seen as one not a sum of its parts. One look at chico and bomer is enough to see who is better looking - lachowski. Mouth is very underrated on this site
So chico has better harmony due to less flaws ?
 
  • +1
Reactions: cytoplasm and HarrierDuBois
Vito Basso has way better harmony than Chico. One of the best harmony ever, but you are biased. If I was pheno base, then I would be saying Stephanov over Vito lol.


Harmony goes for side and 3/4 too and Basso looks borderline recessed in his mandible.
 
  • +1
Reactions: cytoplasm
Vito Basso has way better harmony than Chico. One of the best harmony ever, but you are biased. If I was pheno base, then I would be saying Stephanov over Vito lol.


Strange eyebrows
Unbalanced features like too much cheekbones
Thirds are off too
And poor balance between masc and femm features ,just good ratios he has
 
  • +1
Reactions: HarrierDuBois
facially too, I didn't get much of my masculine bone growth until 25~ and that's not that abnormal for my part of the world, all nords are sort of flat faced aliens until they're late adults.
I am nordic and 19, how much did your face grow between those ages?
 
Prime vs prime Chico mogs but Bomer had a much longer prime. Chico only had 4-5 good years.

32 year old Lachowski looks muchs worse than 32 year old Bomer. Even 45 year old Bomer looks better.

32 year old Chico
1685821495524


vs

32 year old Bomer
1685821655913


45 year old Bomer:
1685821537073
 
Last edited:
Vito Basso has way better harmony than Chico. One of the best harmony ever, but you are biased. If I was pheno base, then I would be saying Stephanov over Vito lol.


Once again, vito's pheno is better than stepanov's slavcel pheno. Vito's recessed lower half is why stepanov, despite the frontal mog, is better looking. Trm doesn't get everything right, they are too front focused as is this site
 
Once again, vito's pheno is better than stepanov's slavcel pheno. Vito's recessed lower half is why stepanov, despite the frontal mog, is better looking. Trm doesn't get everything right, they are too front focused as is this site
I agree that they are too front focused no doubt. Front wise obviously Vito mogs Stephanov. Just like Stephanov side mogs Vito.
 
  • +1
Reactions: cytoplasm
  • +1
  • Love it
Reactions: IMOGYOU and Ken
Meanwhile Simon Nessman a decade later is doing just fine lol. He is even older than Chico by a year.


He took much better care of himself and kept his hair.
 
He took much better care of himself and kept his hair.
Agreed, and he can pass for mid 20s despite being in his 30s.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Ken
but I can't find really videos of Chico looking like the photo on the right. It's like his best photo.
Watch the attached vid
 

Attachments

  • Chico_no_paint.mp4
    3.9 MB
  • Hmm...
Reactions: Leo69
F790896F C1D0 44E3 A3D7 0F41CF6881DB

Chico mogs this HTN-Chadlite to new delhi
 
Chad v Chad. What’s the point lol
 
Chad v Chad. What’s the point lol
Bomer had a longer prime which is what matters. He had strong appeal anyways in his 20s. At this point, it's about preference as they already hit the threshold of universally good looks.

iu
 
  • +1
  • Hmm...
Reactions: LooksmaxxHopeful and AspiringMogger

Similar threads

beautyiswhatwedesir
Replies
12
Views
392
They_are_all_whores
They_are_all_whores
maxlooksmax
Replies
13
Views
378
maxlooksmax
maxlooksmax
fashioncel
Replies
79
Views
1K
fashioncel
fashioncel
T
Replies
1
Views
199
thebigape21
T
heightisthetruth
Replies
8
Views
261
heightisthetruth
heightisthetruth

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top