
william2605
Kraken
- Joined
- Mar 16, 2023
- Posts
- 3,570
- Reputation
- 2,483
Vs

Why chico has better harmony?despite bomer has ideal ratios ?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
"Ageing genetics", mf there is not a single person who looks better and better the older they get, this is just called getting old, everyone gets old.
Tom Cruise Age 21"Ageing genetics", mf there is not a single person who looks better and better the older they get, this is just called getting old, everyone gets old.
Tom Cruise Age 21
Tom Cruise Age 34
You can look facially better looking as you get older in PSL by early 30s to mid 30s like Tom Cruise, Brad Pitt, and Henry Cavill as exaples, but after that. It starts becoming a challenge. I'd say after 40 is when looks start going south in general. Most people however start losing their looks by late 20s.
Tom Cruise Age 21
Tom Cruise Age 34
You can look facially better looking as you get older in PSL by early 30s to mid 30s like Tom Cruise, Brad Pitt, and Henry Cavill as examples, but after that. It starts becoming a challenge. I'd say after 40 is when looks start going south in general. Most people however start losing their looks by late 20s.
Mogs you at 20yo
Chico is 8 TRM or 6.4 PSL. Matt Bomer is facially better looking than Chico, but not by a lot. Both around the same 8 TRM range in their prime.Bro please ca you explain why chico has better harmony
Bomer hrmony isn’t good as chicos oneChico is 8 TRM or 6.4 PSL. Matt Bomer is facially better looking than Chico, but not by a lot. Both around the same 8 TRM range in their prime.
I mog my 20 year old self as well.Mogs you at 20yo
Not really. Bomer is faliod hard by his mouth and forhead, chico has no such failosChico is 8 TRM or 6.4 PSL. Matt Bomer is facially better looking than Chico, but not by a lot. Both around the same 8 TRM range in their prime.
DNRD Bomers eye area is mid as fuck except coloring.Chico is 8 TRM or 6.4 PSL. Matt Bomer is facially better looking than Chico, but not by a lot. Both around the same 8 TRM range in their prime.
And is eyes shape and eyebrows shape aren’t so goodNot really. Bomer is faliod hard by his mouth and forhead, chico has no such failos
Not facially I presume.I mog my 20 year old self as well.
Why chico has better eyes ?DNRD Bomers eye area is mid as fuck except coloring.
View attachment 2238811
It's all about overall attractiveness. Everything matters like jawline and ratios. Not just harmony.Bomer hrmony isn’t good as chicos one
When you compare everything all around, and look at motion. It's clear to see who mogs. Bias makes you pick Chico.Not really. Bomer is faliod hard by his mouth and forhead, chico has no such failos
facially too, I didn't get much of my masculine bone growth until 25~ and that's not that abnormal for my part of the world, all nords are sort of flat faced aliens until they're late adults.Not facially I presume.
It's all about overall attractiveness. Everything matters like jawline and ratios. Not just harmony.
![]()
![]()
Also, I can find videos of Bomer looking like the photo in motion, but I can't find really videos of Chico looking like the photo on the right. It's like his best photo.
When you compare everything all around, and look at motion. It's clear to see who mogs. Bias makes you pick Chico.
Chico is like 7 TRM range in that photo at best due to lack of bones. With these photo comparisons, Matt clearly wins by a mile.
Im not biased towards anything. Youre probably pheno biased which is one thing bomer has on chico. And face should be seen as one not a sum of its parts. One look at chico and bomer is enough to see who is better looking - lachowski. Mouth is very underrated on this siteIt's all about overall attractiveness. Everything matters like jawline and ratios. Not just harmony.
![]()
![]()
Also, I can find videos of Bomer looking like the photo in motion, but I can't find really videos of Chico looking like the photo on the right. It's like his best photo.
When you compare everything all around, and look at motion. It's clear to see who mogs. Bias makes you pick Chico.
ur back wtf"Ageing genetics", mf there is not a single person who looks better and better the older they get, this is just called getting old, everyone gets old.
Vito Basso has way better harmony than Chico. One of the best harmony ever, but you are biased. If I was pheno base, then I would be saying Stephanov over Vito lol.Im not biased towards anything. Youre probably pheno biased which is one thing bomer has on chico. And face should be seen as one not a sum of its parts. One look at chico and bomer is enough to see who is better looking - lachowski. Mouth is very underrated on this site
So chico has better harmony due to less flaws ?Im not biased towards anything. Youre probably pheno biased which is one thing bomer has on chico. And face should be seen as one not a sum of its parts. One look at chico and bomer is enough to see who is better looking - lachowski. Mouth is very underrated on this site
Vito Basso has way better harmony than Chico. One of the best harmony ever, but you are biased. If I was pheno base, then I would be saying Stephanov over Vito lol.
Vito Basso has way better harmony than Chico. One of the best harmony ever, but you are biased. If I was pheno base, then I would be saying Stephanov over Vito lol.
I am nordic and 19, how much did your face grow between those ages?facially too, I didn't get much of my masculine bone growth until 25~ and that's not that abnormal for my part of the world, all nords are sort of flat faced aliens until they're late adults.
From the front isn’t so harmoniousHarmony goes for side and 3/4 too and Basso looks borderline recessed in his mandible.
I'll send you a dm.I am nordic and 19, how much did your face grow between those ages?
Vito Basso has way better harmony than Chico. One of the best harmony ever, but you are biased. If I was pheno base, then I would be saying Stephanov over Vito lol.
I agree that they are too front focused no doubt. Front wise obviously Vito mogs Stephanov. Just like Stephanov side mogs Vito.Once again, vito's pheno is better than stepanov's slavcel pheno. Vito's recessed lower half is why stepanov, despite the frontal mog, is better looking. Trm doesn't get everything right, they are too front focused as is this site
Meanwhile Simon Nessman a decade later is doing just fine lol. He is even older than Chico by a year.Prime vs prime Chico mogs but Bomer had a much longer prime. Chico only had 4-5 good years.
32 year old Lachowski looks muchs worse than 32 year old Bomer. Even 45 year old Bomer looks better.
32 year old Chico
View attachment 2238858
vs
32 year old Bomer
View attachment 2238871
45 year old Bomer:
View attachment 2238863
Meanwhile Simon Nessman a decade later is doing just fine lol. He is even older than Chico by a year.
Agreed, and he can pass for mid 20s despite being in his 30s.He took much better care of himself and kept his hair.
Watch the attached vidbut I can't find really videos of Chico looking like the photo on the right. It's like his best photo.
I've seen all those clips. Not even close to the photo.Watch the attached vid
You can't be serious lol.![]()
Chico mogs this HTN-Chadlite to new delhi
Bomer had a longer prime which is what matters. He had strong appeal anyways in his 20s. At this point, it's about preference as they already hit the threshold of universally good looks.Chad v Chad. What’s the point lol