Maybe de poot eyes are what i need

[Hide]

Low trust eyes that are extremely dimorphic and extremely intimitading

My dad has the same and hes giga intimitading with alot of aura

Maybe just maybe that low trust eye is key

High trust everything else low trust eyes theory?

 

[turkcelfatcel]

Low trust eyes that are extremely dimorphic and extremely intimitading

My dad has the same and hes giga intimitading with alot of aura

Maybe just maybe that low trust eye is key

High trust everything else low trust eyes theory?

Water that the best looking eye area in the world would fix your problems retard

 

[Hide]

Water that the best looking eye area in the world would fix your problems retard

My eye area is my biggest fallo just considering

 

[choppedshyt]

You should only aim for high trust eyes if you're a female, why the fuck would a guy want big cucked eyes over hunter melancholic eyes

 

[Hide]

You should only aim for high trust eyes if you're a female, why the fuck would a guy want big cucked eyes over hunter melancholic eyes

"If you're a female" is this lookism.net nigga im talking about myself

 

[theRetard]

Low trust eyes that are extremely dimorphic and extremely intimitading

and extremely ugly

 

[Hide]

and extremely ugly

Foids and people like it therefore good

 

[theRetard]

Foids and people like it therefore good

conformism final boss

 

[Hide]

conformism final boss

Beauty is dependant on the human g

 

[theRetard]

Beauty is dependant on the human g

no it does not. the idea of beauty isn't dependent on the human interpretation

 

[Hide]

no it does not. the idea of beauty isn't dependent on the human interpretation

What makes beauty objective the so called according to the Greeks jfl

I wonder why our beauty standards are not based so

 

[Sujumh]

 

[Hide]

View attachment 4241361

Better lower orbitals and hed mog ngl

 

[theRetard]

What makes beauty objective the so called according to the Greeks jfl

I wonder why our beauty standards are not based so

i already said that the idea of beauty is not dependent on the human mind

 

[theRetard]

What makes beauty objective the so called according to the Greeks jfl

I wonder why our beauty standards are not based so

and you are still a conformist

 

[Hide]

i already said that the idea of beauty is not dependent on the human mind

Why now jfl use logical reasoning

Beauty is an adjective that describes something that is beautiful, where the object is the something to the human perspective.

If I find the galaxy beautiful, thats because the galaxy is subject to my perspective of beauty

You have never used logical reasoning

 

[Hide]

and you are still a conformist

I am a proud one, cope

 

[theRetard]

Why now jfl use logical reasoning

Beauty is an adjective that describes something that is beautiful, where the object is the something to the human perspective.

If I find the galaxy beautiful, thats because the galaxy is subject to my perspective of beauty

You have never used logical reasoning

you see a beautiful thing because the idea of beauty exists in the object.
and now, you must use the reason. if beauty is subjective then you can claim the concept of beauty is fucking ugly, but it's a contradiction

I am a proud one, cope

shame

 

[justlurkingaround]

You should only aim for high trust eyes if you're a female, why the fuck would a guy want big cucked eyes over hunter melancholic eyes

If you're overall ugly and you have muh hunter eyes you will look aspie and retarded, when your ugly you need high trust friendly eyes to atleast be seen as normal

 

[Hide]

you see a beautiful thing because the idea of beauty exists in the object.
and now, you must use the reason. if beauty is subjective then you can claim the concept of beauty is fucking ugly, but it's a contradiction

shame

Not how it works, concepts cant be "ugly", its an abstract shit, we find soemthing beautiful bexause it derives from our tendencies and needs.

Again, if I find shit beautiful, then shit is beautiful, bexause our needs may be derived that shit is beautiful

We find bright colors beautiful because it helped identify predators, people, etc which is why blue eyes are better

We find stable structures beautiful bexause it represents stability and power for instance

 

[Hide]

If you're overall ugly and you have muh hunter eyes you will look aspie and retarded, when your ugly you need high trust friendly eyes to atleast be seen as normal

Im an lmtn with dogshit eye area

I need the low trust eyes for better dimo ngl

 

[yussimania]

this is low trust i was unkept as fuck here ND out of the loop for a whole month revising for exams not caring about my appearances on like 4 hours of sleep. True indian rapist stare

 

[theRetard]

Not how it works, concepts cant be "ugly", its an abstract shit, we find soemthing beautiful bexause it derives from our tendencies and needs.

Again, if I find shit beautiful, then shit is beautiful, bexause our needs may be derived that shit is beautiful

We find bright colors beautiful because it helped identify predators, people, etc which is why blue eyes are better

We find stable structures beautiful bexause it represents stability and power for instance

i showed you how retarded your opinion is by showing you to what your dogshit point leads (to ugly concept of beauty). your bullshit about mine abstract bullshit is also an abstract bullshit. (and your idea that we find something beautiful cuz of tendencies and need is also an abstact bullshit).
if you find shit beautiful, then your taste in beauty is gigashit. and if beauty is subjective then why are you even on this forum? you claim any chad ulgy and your own truecel face can be claimed beautiful.
we find bright color beautiful (not necessary though) because THE IDEA OF BEAUTY EXISTS IN THOSE OBJECTS. stop that reductio ad evolution cope

 

[Hide]

View attachment 4241412

this is low trust i was unkept as fuck here ND out of the loop for a whole month revising for exams not caring about my appearances on like 4 hours of sleep. True indian rapist stare

Fix bushy ass eyebrows and holy fuck insane eye area

This is the type of eye area i aim to hardmax to jfl

Get contacts and move

 

[yussimania]

Fix bushy ass eyebrows and holy fuck insane eye area

This is the type of eye area i aim to hardmax to jfl

Get contacts and move

bro ive been trying to replicate it ever since idk must have been some sort of light upper eyelid swelling i can't get back to that perfect hooding and my eyebrows have been fixed now

 

[valentine]

im ngl de poot looks aspie

 

[Hide]

i showed you how retarded your opinion by showing you to what your dogshit point leads (to ugly concept of beauty). your bullshit about mine abstract bullshit is also an abstract bullshit. (and your idea that we find something beautiful cuz of tendencies and need is also an abstact bullshit).
if you find shit beautiful, then your taste in beauty is gigashit. and if beauty is subjective then why are you even on this forum? you can any chad only and your own truecel face you can claim beautiful.
we find bright color beautiful (not necessary though) because THE IDEA OF BEAUTY EXISTS IN THOSE OBJECTS. stop that reductio ad evolution cope

The idea of beauty all comes from our own tendencies, there's a reason why humans have different tastes despite all that. Humans find something attractive because it represents their own needs. Women find long ramus beautiful and attractive because it represents strong bite force. Men find thick lips attractive because it represented healthy life. People find nature beautiful because we used to live in nature and they have natural sounds that we evolutionarily adjusted to and have sunlight and etc

The reason why we are in this forum because we want to focus on the tendencies, humans have the tendency to find z attractice so go for z. More often than not, people will find people like hexum or henry caville attractive.

We find the sky beautiful because it helped direct us, gave us light, helped map out, etc.

Your thinking is limited to the idea of beauty being abstract because you dont realize why we find things beautiful. Humans have a tendency for such

If there is beauty in something, then surely there is beauty in upturned noses (untouched evolutionary fearure) or hunter eyes (represents squinting and sheer focus) and etc

 

[Hide]

im ngl de poot looks aspie

He does but its giga dimorphic ngl

Only reason why de poot has any form of dimorphism tbh

 

[valentine]

He does but its giga dimorphic ngl

Only reason why de poot has any form of dimorphism tbh

i cant really decide why i dont like his face but i dont like it.

 

[wollet2]

jfl if someone above the age of 14 is writing these

 

[Hide]

jfl if someone above the age of 14 is writing these

Why you hating on me nigga

 

[wollet2]

Why you hating on me nigga

fuckng repulsive being

 

[Hide]

i cant really decide why i dont like his face but i dont like it.

He has giga wide pfl that makes his eye aspect ratio legit 4 + narrow jaw and weird side which gives him school shooter pheno

If he had wider jaw less pfl and better jawline in general it would look manly lole sean o pry

 

[theRetard]

The idea of beauty all comes from our own tendencies, there's a reason why humans have different tastes despite all that. Humans find something attractive because it represents their own needs. Women find long ramus beautiful and attractive because it represents strong bite force. Men find thick lips attractive because it represented healthy life. People find nature beautiful because we used to live in nature and they have natural sounds that we evolutionarily adjusted to and have sunlight and etc

if the idea of beauty comes from our own tendencies, then i can find ugliness beautiful your whole point is gigaretarded

The reason why we are in this forum because we want to focus on the tendencies, humans have the tendency to find z attractice so go for z. More often than not, people will find people like hexum or henry caville attractive.

We find the sky beautiful because it helped direct us, gave us light, helped map out, etc.

we find the sky beautiful because the idea of beauty lives in the sky, again stop that reductionist point and look at the whole

Your thinking is limited to the idea of beauty being abstract because you dont realize why we find things beautiful. Humans have a tendency for such

because abstractions DO EXIST IN THE OBJECTS, how can you not realize that? i already explain you it many times

If there is beauty in something, then surely there is beauty in upturned noses (untouched evolutionary fearure) or hunter eyes (represents squinting and sheer focus) and etc

no shit upturned noses are primitive and ugly.

 

[Hide]

fuckng repulsive being

Chill g

 

[wollet2]

blocked of course

 

[Hide]

if the idea of beauty comes from our own tendencies, then i can find ugliness beautiful your whole point is gigaretarded

we find the sky beautiful because the idea of beauty lives in the sky, again stop that reductionist point and look at the whole

because abstractions DO EXIST IN THE OBJECTS, how can you not realize that? i already explain you it many times

no shit upturned noses are primitive and ugly.

Ugliness is a concept lol, why are concepts attributed, concepts are concepts that cant have human perspective adjectives apart from the level of difficulty

 

[Hide]

blocked of course

It ain't that serious

 

[theRetard]

Ugliness is a concept lol, why are concepts attributed, concepts are concepts that cant human perspective adjectives apart from the level of difficult

can you write this in a coherent way? i don't understand a single word

 

[Hide]

can you write this in a coherent way? i don't understand a single word

Ok, a concept cannot be beautiful or ugly because they are ideas and not objects. Ugliness is a concept, it is an idea, how can you attribute something that is abstract? It cannot be because humans cant visualize concepts without integrating them into objects. If the concept is not integrated, then it just floats your head.

Ugliness as a concept cannot be beautiful because it is merely an idea. If Ugliness is put into an object, then it is ugly. You cant make Ugliness beautiful.

 

[Hide]

Ok, a concept cannot be beautiful or ugly because they are ideas and not objects. Ugliness is a concept, it is an idea, how can you attribute something that is abstract? It cannot be because humans cant visualize concepts without integrating them into objects. If the concept is not integrated, then it just floats your head.

Ugliness as a concept cannot be beautiful because it is merely an idea. If Ugliness is put into an object, then it is ugly. You cant make Ugliness beautiful.

@Jason Voorhees since ur high iq, what xan you say about the arguments and the argumentation and etc for both sides ig

Is this a high iq debate?

 

[theRetard]

Ok, a concept cannot be beautiful or ugly because they are ideas and not objects. Ugliness is a concept, it is an idea, how can you attribute something that is abstract? It cannot be because humans cant visualize concepts without integrating them into objects. If the concept is not integrated, then it just floats your head.

Ugliness as a concept cannot be beautiful because it is merely an idea. If Ugliness is put into an object, then it is ugly. You cant make Ugliness beautiful.

indeed, that's my whole point. you admitted all that yourself.

 

[Ghoulish]

You should only aim for high trust eyes if you're a female, why the fuck would a guy want big cucked eyes over hunter melancholic eyes

One of the highest appeal eye areas ever btw

Foids would choose this over de poo any day

 

[Hide]

indeed, that's my whole point. you admitted all that yourself.

You have a different approach to argumentation, you rhink that concepts can be ugly

Ugliness cannot be beautiful bexause it is a concept, your argumentation is completely different

The base definition of beauty is legit an adjective that comes from the perspective of a human, we are describing the idea of an object being beautiful

Concepts are not the same as objects

 

[Hide]

One of the highest appeal eye areas ever btw

View attachment 4241471

Foids would choose this over de poo any day

Ipd but giga high appeal

 

[theRetard]

You have a different approach to argumentation, you rhink that concepts can be ugly

Ugliness cannot be beautiful bexause it is a concept, your argumentation is completely different

The base definition of beauty is legit an adjective that comes from the perspective of a human, we are describing the idea

Concepts are not the same as objects

where i claimed that concepts can be ugly? i claimed that YOU can claim that the concept of beauty might be called ugly IF WE TAKE YOUR RETARDED PREMISE about beauty being subjective (it's not).
I say that ideas exist in objects and so independently from your perspective, what you admitted by saying ""Ok, a concept cannot be beautiful or ugly because they are ideas and not objects. Ugliness is a concept, it is an idea, how can you attribute something that is abstract? It cannot be because humans cant visualize concepts without integrating them into objects. If the concept is not integrated, then it just floats your head""

 

[Hide]

where i claimed that concepts can be ugly? i claimed that YOU can claim that the concept of beauty might be called ugly IF WE TAKE YOUR RETARDED PREMISE about beauty being subjective (it's not).
I say that ideas exist in objects and so independently from your perspective, what you admitted by saying ""Ok, a concept cannot be beautiful or ugly because they are ideas and not objects. Ugliness is a concept, it is an idea, how can you attribute something that is abstract? It cannot be because humans cant visualize concepts without integrating them into objects. If the concept is not integrated, then it just floats your head""

Is an object the same as an idea? Lets think about it, why do we attribute things to beauty in different ways. Why do some people tend to like a specific type? How can it be objective when everyone has different favourite colors, etc

When we talk about specific traits being found beautiful, thats because alot of people's subjective perspective agree on it. Objectivity would mean that there is an axiom when it isnt. We have to first agree on the idea which doesnt come very often and we'd have to not need to agree for something to be objective. We find beauty bexahse we put jt from our perspective. We find something beautiful because it always comes to the human. An abstract concept that cant be visualised without integrating into an object cannot be really seen as veautiful because at the end of the day, it just floats in your head. Now, why do we find x traits beautiful and we conflate them with attractive? Because again, it arrives from the perspective of human. We can put the idea of beauty into something like peeing and it can come from our needs although rare. Some people find different types of houses beautiful, how can it be objective?

An axiom would require something to not needed to be agreed to be true, otherwise, it is no objective axiom. Axioms are true before humanity even thought of it, and if axioms require agreement for it to be true, then is it an axiom? Humans didn't find e=mc^2 true because they were simply wrong when it is an SCIENTIFIC axiom that describes the state of our universe into how it is, not how we think it is, but beauty is something that we describe as, as beauty as a concept doesnt exist without man first creating it.

 

[theRetard]

Is an object the same as an idea? Lets think about it, why do we attribute things to beauty in different ways. Why do some people tend to like a specific type? How can it be objective when everyone has different favourite colors, etc

object is the matter+idea, so it either have the accident of beauty, or something else. Even if people like the specific type of beauty, then it's only their fucking preference inside beautiful objects, it doesn't disprove shit about the whole beauty being objective. They still like the beauty, just some specific type, and even if someone doesn't like the whole beauty and prefers ugliness, to what your point leads toward if we take your premise about subjectiveness of beauty (which you yourself refuted), then it shows again how retarded it is.

When we talk about specific traits being found beautiful, thats because alot of people's subjective perspective agree on it. Objectivity would mean that there is an axiom when it isnt. We have to first agree on the idea which doesnt come very often and we'd have to not need to agree for something to be objective. We find beauty bexahse we put jt from our perspective. We find something beautiful because it always comes to the human. An abstract concept that cant be visualised without integrating into an object cannot be really seen as veautiful because at the end of the day, it just floats in your head. Now, why do we find x traits beautiful and we conflate them with attractive? Because again, it arrives from the perspective of human. We can put the idea of beauty into something like peeing and it can come from our needs although rare. Some people find different types of houses beautiful, how can it be objective?

if beauty is subjective, then your claim about it's subjectiveness is also just subjective JFL. so no point in accepting that.
so firstly you are saying that >An abstract concept that cant be visualised without integrating into an object cannot be really seen as veautiful because at the end of the day, it just floats in your head.

which means that idea of beauty exists in objects instead of your perspective, and then you are debunking yourself by saying that it just floats in your head

our whole point is contradictory and self-refuting

An axiom would require something to not needed to be agreed to be true, otherwise, it is no objective axiom. Axioms are true before humanity even thought of it, and if axioms require agreement for it to be true, then is it an axiom?

yes even if we are debating about that then it is still an axiom. And your claim about "axioms do not need the requirement to be argued with" is also a debatable axiom

Humans didn't find e=mc^2 true because they were simply wrong when it is an SCIENTIFIC axiom that describes the state of our universe into how it is, not how we think it is, but beauty is something that we describe as, as beauty as a concept doesnt exist without man first creating it.

first you say about some mathematical thing being an unarguable axiom, and then you are saying that it was the men who created the beauty. So why is that? by this logic i can say that maths is also a men made thing. so why is beauty the exception? (you wont answer it)

 

[Hide]

object is the matter+idea, so it either have the accident of beauty, or something else. Even if people like the specific type of beauty, then it's only their fucking preference inside beautiful objects, it doesn't disprove shit about the whole beauty being objective. They still like the beauty, just some specific type, and even if someone doesn't like the whole beauty and prefers ugliness, to what your point leads toward if we take your premise about subjectiveness of beauty (which you yourself refuted), then it shows again how retarded it is.

if beauty is subjective, then your claim about it's subjectiveness is also just subjective JFL. so no point in accepting that.
so firstly you are saying that >An abstract concept that cant be visualised without integrating into an object cannot be really seen as veautiful because at the end of the day, it just floats in your head.

which means that idea of beauty exists in objects instead of your perspective, and then you are debunking yourself by saying that it just floats in your head

our whole point is contradictory and self-refuting

yes even if we are debating about that then it is still an axiom. And your claim about "axioms do not need the requirement to be argued with" is also a debatable axiom

first you say about some mathematical thing being an unarguable axiom, and then you are saying that it was the men who created the beauty. So why is that? by this logic i can say that maths is also a men made thing. so why is beauty the exception? (you wont answer it)

Ok, the base perspective i think that you're going for is the concept of harmony rather than beauty itself. Ive noticed that alot of the terms of beauty you use is what you really describe as harmony. The term harmony describes how objects conflate to something under specific parameters to really fit. Harmony depends on parameters that are mathematical or logical. Harmony can be objective and subjective. If Harmony is 60/40 in the parameters and its 50/50, it doesnt fit the Harmony. Now, here's the thing. When those parameters are put, there's symmetry, harmony, ideas, etc. Remember these parameters come from what we put, and as such, these are necessary. It really depends on whether we go into math or not

However, if we cant put the idea of harmony into an object, into something, into anything, then it will float, because again, we might as well be schizophrenic.

Now, mathematics and axioms ARE NOT subjective. They ARE NOT MANMADE. They describe what it is. How we describe using something like 2pir of circumference is how we attribute, however, they are relations that exist perfectly in nature. If we say that cancer harms you, is it man made? No. The word cancer may be man made, and the word harm may be man made, but if we add into the perspective of you (the mammal), it is objectively true. If i put an apple up and correlate with MGH on the energy it puts, is it man made? No. The symbols are man made.

Now, beauty that you are describing comes from shared human experience. Humans are describing a phenomenon or idea that they see, we put parameters. Even those symmetries we find come from our biological tendencies like our needs. Beauty is simply from our parameters, remove parameters that humans experience and how can beauty be defined? Why do people have different parameters, symmetry is not always the same as beauty btw, because they can describe something of an object or how we attribute the object and how the object fits our attribute

 

[theRetard]

Ok, the base perspective i think that you're going for is the concept of harmony rather than beauty itself. Ive noticed that alot of the terms of beauty you use is what you really describe as harmony. The term harmony describes how objects conflate to something under specific parameters to really fit. Harmony depends on parameters that are mathematical or logical. Harmony can be objective and subjective. If Harmony is 60/40 in the parameters and its 50/5], it doesnt fit the Harmony. Now, here's the thing. When those parameters are put, there's symmetry, harmony, ideas, etc. Remember these parameters come from what we put, and as such, these are necessary. It really depends on whether we go into math or not

how can harmony can be both objective and subjective? you said that it depends on mathematical parameters, so it cannot be subjective NOHOW

However, if we cant put the idea of harmony into an object, into something, into anything, then it will float, because again, we might as well be schizophrenic.

no, we don't put harmony into an object. it already exists in an object. so it doesn't matter if you are a schizo or not

Now, mathematics and axioms ARE NOT subjective. They ARE NOT MANMADE. They describe what it is. How we describe using something like 2pir of circumference is how we attribute, however, they are relations that exist perfectly in nature. If we say that cancer harms you, is it man made? No. The word cancer may be man made, and the word harm may be man made, but if we add into the perspective of you (the mammal), it is objectively true. If i put an apple up and correlate with MGH on the energy it puts, is it man made? No. The symbols are man made.

and so? i agree with that maths being objective. but you haven't explain why beauty is subjective while maths is not (like where's the difference, they are both just muh muh ideas and you think that ideas only float in mind which is nontrue)

Now, beauty that you are describing comes from shared human experience. Humans are describing a phenomenon or idea that they see, we put parameters. Even those symmetries we find come from our biological tendencies like our needs. Beauty is simply from our parameters, remove parameters that humans experience and how can beauty be defined? Why do people have different parameters, symmetry is not always the same as beauty btw, because they can describe something of an object or how we attribute the object and how the object fits our attribute

yes! you got it!!!! humans see a phenomenon/idea (so if they see it first instead of making it up) so beauty exists independently from human's reason!!! i'm really glad that you have got all that!