D
Deleted member 21716
Victim of autocorrect
- Joined
- Aug 23, 2022
- Posts
- 5,510
- Reputation
- 6,440
not the other way around. in most species especially mammals and birds the male is far more striking. it's just natural order.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
which species are you talking about because in most species the male has top be more strikingIn other species the female is prettier, how does your natural order explain it
... and you still haven't answered while I can name hundred where the male looks better ofc there is exceptions but for the vast majority of species the male is more striking than the femaleIn other species the female is prettier, how does your natural order explain it
this isn't an exception though. I literally study biology and for many species especially mammals and birds the males are far more colorful and striking than the females.No, this is cope. There are always exceptions in nature. Women look better on average and it is supposed to be like that
this isn't an exception though. I literally study biology and for many species especially mammals and birds the males are far more colorful and striking than the females.
men and women on average are about the same with men having a slight edge because women fraud
and the usual gay insult when you have no argument
Nigga my argument is to just look around and get your butt plug out of your assand the usual gay insult when you have no argument
idk where you live because where I live the women look terrible while the men despite being plain still look betterNigga my argument is to just look around and get your butt plug out of your ass
this isn't an exception though. I literally study biology and for many species especially mammals and birds the males are far more colorful and striking than the females.
men and women on average are about the same with men having a slight edge because women fraud
Pheasants too. Even the image showcased on the Wikipedia page for sexual dimorphism has an example of this.Yup Peacocks and Lions.
Not really because historically men could rape to pass on their genes, women weren't necceserily the selectors. And during the rise of our civilization up until not so long ago marriages were arranged/female selection was limites by patriarchynot the other way around. in most species especially mammals and birds the male is far more striking. it's just natural order.
well nearly all women got a chance to have a family and there was till some degree of selectionNot really because historically men could rape to pass on their genes, women weren't necceserily the selectors. And during the rise of our civilization up until not so long ago marriages were arranged/female selection was limites by patriarchy
exactly which means having good bones and healthy featuresMen are supposed look high fighting success
the selection was probably just driven by concealed ovulation. women mated with chad and went to the guy with resources for protection and that's how looks were driven forwardwell nearly all women got a chance to have a family and there was till some degree of selection
the opposite for men
Women fraud because it works and men are horny enough to fall for it. Women are blackpilled from childhood while men are bluepilled by society and family from childhood.female animals don't wear makeup and fraaaaaud
Stags and does too. It’s incredible that simps have allowed women to be put on a pedestal for so long.Pheasants too. Even the image showcased on the Wikipedia page for sexual dimorphism has an example of this.
Male duck is the left one.
When there is no sexual selection, such as in the case of elephant seals, the biggest male wins, even if the females of that species selects for different traits, because of mate-guarding.