“Men need to lower their standards on dating apps, new study shows”

[Jatt]

STANDARDS??? WHAT STANDARDS I DO NOT HAVE ANY STANDARDS I AM A INDIAN I DONT DESERVE ANY STANDARDS I SHOULD BE GRATEFUL AT ANY WOMEN WANTING ME

 

[Node]

J to the F to the L

 

[BigBallsLarry]

true and real

but im not indian

 

[silently_said]

Dogshit study that quantifies value as the amount of swipes holes are getting

 

[Slayfer]

don't women only swipe on like 10% of people, compared to the 50% men swipe on.

 

[mrdouchebag]

Retarded study made by retard "scientists".

They measured desirability based on number of swipes women get and they concluded that women are much more desirable than men.The only thing that proves is that a lot of men are willing to pork mids, fatties and sub5s if it requires little to no effort and investment on their part. That's not news. Even a butterface or a fattie might better than the hand. Men will even fuck sheep and goats under the right circumstances. During the primordial times, the cavemen would pork and impregnate anything and bail, leaving the whore and the bastard to fend on their own. If the bastard survives, the man's genetic lineage survives. If it doesn't, who cares, it was just a quick fuck that burnt at most 100 calories, definitely not some great energy expenditure or investment. There was no child support, police or laws back in the day. At most her geriatric father could try to kill you, but without guns, that oldcel will have been at a huge disadvantage. And let's be honest, his daughter was a slut, how would he even know who impregnated her? Lmao, no DNA tests back then. That's the gist about how men's mating strategy developed.

But for long term relationships where commitment and heavy investment is required? There is no charity. 50th percentile women can only end up with a man of similar attractiveness, unless they get extremely lucky or take a lot initiative, put effort and open their wallet wide open(assuming they have a lot of money) just like men have been doing since the dawn of the multiverse to pork hotter women than themselves.

The ratio in the younger ages is pretty close by the way, 105 men are born for every 100 women, but also male infants and babies are more likely to die. Same applies to young men(criminalmaxxers, gangbangers, reckless badboys with too much test), so in the 35 and under group, the ratio is probably closer to 103 men for 100 women. So while statistically women have a slight advantage, it's not that big and it definitely doesn't account for the great difference in expectations.

People forget women also compete with other women. Some Becky doesn't have the first pick and will never have the first pick when hotter women and Stacies exist. Hotter women are much more likely to pair up and be in long term relationships. It wouldn't make any sense whatsoever, if Beckies were snatching the Chads and Stacies ended up childless and single in the end.

 

[The Grinch]

Why are you so emotional?

 

[Jatt]

Why are you so emotional?

I AM TIRED OF NOT GETTING LAID

 

[gurt]

STANDARDS??? WHAT STANDARDS I DO NOT HAVE ANY STANDARDS I AM A INDIAN I DONT DESERVE ANY STANDARDS I SHOULD BE GRATEFUL AT ANY WOMEN WANTING ME

" This suggests that a lot of the swipes fail to develop beyond the initial attempt, and that the successful matches seem to reflect women’s preferences rather than men’s." JFL original paper states the exact opposite, fucking new york post jews

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/a...urce=pr&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=plos006