Men with slightly longer legs are more attractive to women

Status
Not open for further replies.
Pendejo

Pendejo

Kraken
Joined
Apr 15, 2019
Posts
18,589
Reputation
29,061
 ̄  ̄  ̄  ̄  ̄  ̄

The researchers, who are psychologists at the University of Cambridge, recruited online 74 heterosexual female participants aged 20 to 69. Each woman was shown 28 images, one at a time, and was asked to rate attractiveness on a scale from 1 (not attractive) to 7 (very attractive). As shown in the left-hand figure below, all male images were the same height. The only difference in each set of figures was the leg-to-body ratio.


menlonglegs3.jpg



The center image in each set, marked "0", represents the average leg-to-body ratio. The numbers on each side represent the number of standard deviations away from the average each image represents. For instance, the image marked "-1" means that the male has a leg-to-body ratio that is one standard deviation below average.


When the researchers crunched the numbers and added a best-fit curve, they found that women preferred men with slightly longer legs than average. (See right-hand figure.) Specifically, the most attractive male has a leg-to-body ratio that is 0.5 standard deviations above average. Men with leg-to-body ratios that were too high or too low were rated as less attractive, with short-legged men being seen as the least attractive. These results were consistent across skin colors.


The data for silhouettes (bottom row) were different. Here, women preferred men with very slightly lower leg-to-body ratios than average. However, compared to the 3D-rendered images, silhouettes are not very realistic, which may explain this inconsistent result.


The authors note that a similar study conducted in Japan showed that women preferred men with average leg-to-body ratios, which suggests that the preference for slightly longer legs may be cultural. That's one big reason why evolutionary psychology studies must always be interpreted with caution.


This research might also offer a new dating strategy for men: Throw on a pair of high heels to really catch the ladies' eyes.

 ̄  ̄  ̄  ̄  ̄  ̄
Link to the study:
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 685, PubertyMaxxer, Deleted member 4209 and 2 others
Short legs are low class tbh
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 685, PubertyMaxxer, Deleted member 3828 and 5 others
Short legged kings btfo
 
YET ANOTHER BBC PILL
 
There are no legs for your face.
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Slayerino
Good thing i have short legs but long torso and monkey arms
 
  • So Sad
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 4209 and Slayerino
Interesting how they rated the black figure lower than the white one
 
  • JFL
Reactions: LowTierNormie and Slayerino
BBC trait. It’s the reason theyre better at running and jumping but whites are better at swimming(long torso is better)
 
short limbs in general = giga incel trait
 
  • +1
Reactions: PubertyMaxxer
  • +1
Reactions: PURE ARYAN GENETICS
It's over if she can't suck your cock while you're both in standing position
 
 ̄  ̄  ̄  ̄  ̄  ̄

The researchers, who are psychologists at the University of Cambridge, recruited online 74 heterosexual female participants aged 20 to 69. Each woman was shown 28 images, one at a time, and was asked to rate attractiveness on a scale from 1 (not attractive) to 7 (very attractive). As shown in the left-hand figure below, all male images were the same height. The only difference in each set of figures was the leg-to-body ratio.


menlonglegs3.jpg



The center image in each set, marked "0", represents the average leg-to-body ratio. The numbers on each side represent the number of standard deviations away from the average each image represents. For instance, the image marked "-1" means that the male has a leg-to-body ratio that is one standard deviation below average.


When the researchers crunched the numbers and added a best-fit curve, they found that women preferred men with slightly longer legs than average. (See right-hand figure.) Specifically, the most attractive male has a leg-to-body ratio that is 0.5 standard deviations above average. Men with leg-to-body ratios that were too high or too low were rated as less attractive, with short-legged men being seen as the least attractive. These results were consistent across skin colors.


The data for silhouettes (bottom row) were different. Here, women preferred men with very slightly lower leg-to-body ratios than average. However, compared to the 3D-rendered images, silhouettes are not very realistic, which may explain this inconsistent result.


The authors note that a similar study conducted in Japan showed that women preferred men with average leg-to-body ratios, which suggests that the preference for slightly longer legs may be cultural. That's one big reason why evolutionary psychology studies must always be interpreted with caution.


This research might also offer a new dating strategy for men: Throw on a pair of high heels to really catch the ladies' eyes.

 ̄  ̄  ̄  ̄  ̄  ̄
Link to the study:
Screenshot 20200209 114351 Chrome
 
That is one of the main reason people look better when wearing lifts. The height is addes only to your legs, so they look longer.
Better proportions and extra height, lifts are a godsend
 
So leg lifts are a legit looksmax that doesn't create weird proportions? lol ok.
 
Does arm length have any effect on attractiveness? I usually get comments on my ape arms and 9/10 times it's from a girl.
 
 ̄  ̄  ̄  ̄  ̄  ̄

The researchers, who are psychologists at the University of Cambridge, recruited online 74 heterosexual female participants aged 20 to 69. Each woman was shown 28 images, one at a time, and was asked to rate attractiveness on a scale from 1 (not attractive) to 7 (very attractive). As shown in the left-hand figure below, all male images were the same height. The only difference in each set of figures was the leg-to-body ratio.


menlonglegs3.jpg



The center image in each set, marked "0", represents the average leg-to-body ratio. The numbers on each side represent the number of standard deviations away from the average each image represents. For instance, the image marked "-1" means that the male has a leg-to-body ratio that is one standard deviation below average.


When the researchers crunched the numbers and added a best-fit curve, they found that women preferred men with slightly longer legs than average. (See right-hand figure.) Specifically, the most attractive male has a leg-to-body ratio that is 0.5 standard deviations above average. Men with leg-to-body ratios that were too high or too low were rated as less attractive, with short-legged men being seen as the least attractive. These results were consistent across skin colors.


The data for silhouettes (bottom row) were different. Here, women preferred men with very slightly lower leg-to-body ratios than average. However, compared to the 3D-rendered images, silhouettes are not very realistic, which may explain this inconsistent result.


The authors note that a similar study conducted in Japan showed that women preferred men with average leg-to-body ratios, which suggests that the preference for slightly longer legs may be cultural. That's one big reason why evolutionary psychology studies must always be interpreted with caution.


This research might also offer a new dating strategy for men: Throw on a pair of high heels to really catch the ladies' eyes.

 ̄  ̄  ̄  ̄  ̄  ̄
Link to the study:
Basically larger femur
 
 ̄  ̄  ̄  ̄  ̄  ̄

The researchers, who are psychologists at the University of Cambridge, recruited online 74 heterosexual female participants aged 20 to 69. Each woman was shown 28 images, one at a time, and was asked to rate attractiveness on a scale from 1 (not attractive) to 7 (very attractive). As shown in the left-hand figure below, all male images were the same height. The only difference in each set of figures was the leg-to-body ratio.


menlonglegs3.jpg



The center image in each set, marked "0", represents the average leg-to-body ratio. The numbers on each side represent the number of standard deviations away from the average each image represents. For instance, the image marked "-1" means that the male has a leg-to-body ratio that is one standard deviation below average.


When the researchers crunched the numbers and added a best-fit curve, they found that women preferred men with slightly longer legs than average. (See right-hand figure.) Specifically, the most attractive male has a leg-to-body ratio that is 0.5 standard deviations above average. Men with leg-to-body ratios that were too high or too low were rated as less attractive, with short-legged men being seen as the least attractive. These results were consistent across skin colors.


The data for silhouettes (bottom row) were different. Here, women preferred men with very slightly lower leg-to-body ratios than average. However, compared to the 3D-rendered images, silhouettes are not very realistic, which may explain this inconsistent result.


The authors note that a similar study conducted in Japan showed that women preferred men with average leg-to-body ratios, which suggests that the preference for slightly longer legs may be cultural. That's one big reason why evolutionary psychology studies must always be interpreted with caution.


This research might also offer a new dating strategy for men: Throw on a pair of high heels to really catch the ladies' eyes.

 ̄  ̄  ̄  ̄  ̄  ̄
Link to the study:
So whats the best leg to body ratio?
 
Legit long limbs matter so much and make you look higher class, more intimidating and taller
 
brb 9-11cm height increase shoes
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

M
Replies
35
Views
912
MedMogger
M
Angutoid
Replies
44
Views
518
e65man
e65man
mathis
Replies
34
Views
1K
BudgetBarrett
BudgetBarrett
Zagron_killahbee
Replies
7
Views
338
jefty
jefty

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top