Deleted member 14160
12 PSL
- Joined
- Jun 2, 2021
- Posts
- 7,266
- Reputation
- 22,003
I’m not trying to say Ethnics mog or whites mog, not the point of this. This is only to analyze preferences once you are 6 PSL Plus.
A year back, three users ran experiments with dozens of women they knew in which they were asked to rate who they preferred between @Salludon and @Amnesia. Sikkunt user was ethnic, and Xefo was white, and from the names of the samples used, the women asked were a majority white and some ethnic. ONE Example of 48 which were carried out:
Sikkunt got 14-4, Xefo 12-8, and deltd. User got 9-1 all in Salludon’s favour. This controls for population as n=48 is very healthy to reach a statistical hypothesis. Overall Salludon won 35-13, which is a statistically significant outcome, p value <0.01.
This study controls for racial bias in both participants as well as the conductor of the study. Sikkunt’s other post shows women were half torn between thinking Salludon as South Asian/MENA and South Euro- both ethnic in this forum’s regard. The pictures used are fair and accentuate each’s respective strengths, such as Amnesia’s “blue” (lol) eyes and white skin and Salludon’s bone structure. Both have been rated around 6.5 PSL and thus are good proxies for WASP vs Ethnic disparity.
So what is the conclusion that can be determined from this meta analysis:
A) Chad is his own Race- at 6 PSL+, racial/ethnic biases or preferences become far less important/negligible
B) Bone structure is greater determinate for attraction, but obviously doesn’t mean colouring is obsolete.
C) These findings Only applies for 6+ ethnics, tax for ethnics below is much much harsher (this is def true tbh)
You can select more than one option, whichever ones you think apply and when I talk about colouring in B, I’m not including Dravidians/Asians
@Biiyo03 @StrangerDanger @thecel @AscendingHero @gamma @looksmaxxer234 @Preston @EverythingMattersCel @reptiles @Reckless Turtle @germanlooks @Chadeep @VicMackey @MakinItHappenReturn @forevergymcelling
A year back, three users ran experiments with dozens of women they knew in which they were asked to rate who they preferred between @Salludon and @Amnesia. Sikkunt user was ethnic, and Xefo was white, and from the names of the samples used, the women asked were a majority white and some ethnic. ONE Example of 48 which were carried out:
Sikkunt got 14-4, Xefo 12-8, and deltd. User got 9-1 all in Salludon’s favour. This controls for population as n=48 is very healthy to reach a statistical hypothesis. Overall Salludon won 35-13, which is a statistically significant outcome, p value <0.01.
This study controls for racial bias in both participants as well as the conductor of the study. Sikkunt’s other post shows women were half torn between thinking Salludon as South Asian/MENA and South Euro- both ethnic in this forum’s regard. The pictures used are fair and accentuate each’s respective strengths, such as Amnesia’s “blue” (lol) eyes and white skin and Salludon’s bone structure. Both have been rated around 6.5 PSL and thus are good proxies for WASP vs Ethnic disparity.
So what is the conclusion that can be determined from this meta analysis:
A) Chad is his own Race- at 6 PSL+, racial/ethnic biases or preferences become far less important/negligible
B) Bone structure is greater determinate for attraction, but obviously doesn’t mean colouring is obsolete.
C) These findings Only applies for 6+ ethnics, tax for ethnics below is much much harsher (this is def true tbh)
You can select more than one option, whichever ones you think apply and when I talk about colouring in B, I’m not including Dravidians/Asians
@Biiyo03 @StrangerDanger @thecel @AscendingHero @gamma @looksmaxxer234 @Preston @EverythingMattersCel @reptiles @Reckless Turtle @germanlooks @Chadeep @VicMackey @MakinItHappenReturn @forevergymcelling
Last edited:
