![ahouzeh18](/data/avatars/l/65/65958.jpg?1719862891)
ahouzeh18
Bronze
- Joined
- Mar 10, 2024
- Posts
- 398
- Reputation
- 264
Which one has a bigger effect on the perceived mid face length? Is it the mid face ratio (IPD divided by mid face length), or the absolute mid face length (nose length + philtrum length)?
Midface ratio is obviously affected heavily by IPD, and someone could in theory have a wide IPD with a long overall mid face and still have a good mid face ratio. However, their mid face could still be too long for their face.
On the other hand, Charlie Kirk has a low mid face ratio (0.9 I believe) but still has a mid face that is too small for his face.
is mid face ratio an inaccurate way to determine if someone has a long mid face?
Midface ratio is obviously affected heavily by IPD, and someone could in theory have a wide IPD with a long overall mid face and still have a good mid face ratio. However, their mid face could still be too long for their face.
On the other hand, Charlie Kirk has a low mid face ratio (0.9 I believe) but still has a mid face that is too small for his face.
is mid face ratio an inaccurate way to determine if someone has a long mid face?
Attachments
Last edited: