
ascensionneeeded
sub5 infraorbitals
- Joined
- Oct 3, 2024
- Posts
- 828
- Reputation
- 1,043
• MK-677, unlike CJC + ipamorelin without DAC, produces sustained, high levels of IGF-1, which are required for craniofacial remodelling.
• MK-677 has consistently increased markers of bone formation and resorption such as osteocalcin and NTx, and in animal models it has ‘enhanced linear growth and bone mineral accrual, directly supporting its role in skeletal development’.
• Despite CJC + ipamorelin (with dac) having greater increases in IGF-1 above baseline, the increases are not sustained enough for any likelihood of craniofacial gains.
MK is still weak for such goals and is undoubtedly terrible in comparison to HGH, but for people with strict parents or people on a budget, i’d go with 25MG mk677 a day rather than injecting CJC + ipamorelin (especially if it’s without DAC)
- in terms of safety, i’d just monitor fasted glucose levels with a glucose monitor and supplement berberine where needed. since aromatisation could be slightly increased id also supplement with DIM and/or calcium-D-glucarate if needed.
(Murphy et al., 2001), (Nass et al., 2008), (Chapman et al., 2009), (Dickson et al., 1995)
• MK-677 has consistently increased markers of bone formation and resorption such as osteocalcin and NTx, and in animal models it has ‘enhanced linear growth and bone mineral accrual, directly supporting its role in skeletal development’.
• Despite CJC + ipamorelin (with dac) having greater increases in IGF-1 above baseline, the increases are not sustained enough for any likelihood of craniofacial gains.

- in terms of safety, i’d just monitor fasted glucose levels with a glucose monitor and supplement berberine where needed. since aromatisation could be slightly increased id also supplement with DIM and/or calcium-D-glucarate if needed.
(Murphy et al., 2001), (Nass et al., 2008), (Chapman et al., 2009), (Dickson et al., 1995)