Sociobiology
Fuchsia
- Joined
- Apr 9, 2022
- Posts
- 11,021
- Reputation
- 12,479
The failure of liberalism is unable to under the following: A man who cheats on his wife is going to cheat business partners. Which means the character a person shows in their personal life is going to reflect in their professional life — especially if there's repeated occurrence of the same behaviour. Therefore, judging someone's personal life is a reliable indicator of how they'll act in professional settings. This is why I'm not okay with, let's call them foids to disassociate from women who are not like this, displaying an entitled, delusional, transactional mindset when it comes to dating. The liberal principle of "letting people live their lives" doesn't work, there are people who will use their free will to violate the rights of others which therefore requires intervention. It's my body my choice until you use your body to hurt other people. In order for complex society to exist we must sometimes take on some responsibility to uphold the functioning of society (think leadership jobs). A leadership position is definitionally a collectively oriented task, you cannot separate yourself from the group when you are a leader. If someone shows repeated patterns of immoral behavior I do not want to associate with them, and I do not see why this would be a controversial thing to say. As an example, if a foid has insane dating standards for men they're going to judge their male coworkers with those same standards but in a non-sexualised context. The higher the position of power a foid has, the more harm they can spread onto other people, this isn't acceptable and underminds the point of letting people live their lives without state interefence. This is especially troubling in the modern day because the economy is SHIT, people can't just leave their job if they have a toxic colleague or boss because their are no job available.
