Monogamy is the reason most people are ugly...

[disillusioned]

Think about it. Why else would there even exist ugly or mediocre looking people at all? Normies and incels are nothing more than the byproduct of thousands of years worth of rampant dysgenics produced by artificially enforced sexual equality in which almost all males got to breed almost regardless of genetic quality. If the 80/20 rule was actually applied since the very beginning we would all be chads with high IQ since inferior traits would be largely out of the gene pool. And before anybody says "women would just have higher standards"...maybe. But with genetic inequality between the extremes being less massive, it would be easier to compete.

 

[haircutcel]

dn read but i already know it is a quality and well thought out high iq post

 

[Deleted member 2597]

Think about it. Why else would there even exist ugly or mediocre looking people at all? Normies and incels are nothing more than the byproduct of thousands of years worth of rampant dysgenics produced by artificially enforced sexual equality in which almost all males got to breed almost regardless of genetic quality. If the 80/20 rule was actually applied since the very beginning we would all be chads with high IQ since inferior traits would be largely out of the gene pool. And before anybody says "women would just have higher standards"...maybe. But with genetic inequality between the extremes being less massive, it would be easier to compete.

Legit.

This is why we need genetic engineering.

 

[ToursOverBoyo2020]

No, because ugly women would still reproduce leading to ugly children. The male would be incel and wouldn't reproduce but the ugly female will reproduce and the cycle continues. As long as men continue to have no standards there will be a huge incel epidemic.

 

[disillusioned]

No, because ugly women would still reproduce leading to ugly children.

Ugly woman + more attractive man will still make the next generation an improvement over the last one. I'm even an example of this. My father is 6/10 and my mother is 3. I'm about 4.

 

[CursedOne]

I agree with you but theres genetic recombination too.

 

[Danish_Retard]

Society would've fallen if monogamy wasn't enforced.
but true

 

[Lev Peshkov]

It's not that boyo, it's simple

1) inbreeding amplifies recessive genes (high cholesterol which is the ugly gene)
2) we've technically been inbreeding since the dawn of time
3) less attractive people features are produced over time
4) these ugly genes are spread

We've literally gotta an epidemic of illness which is ugliness

Look at animals
barely any ugly ones. Because they don't in breed. They cross breed

 

[Deleted member 4383]

Cope.

This is Oprys mother, a 3-4/10

On the left lies Oprys dad, a 5.5 at best in his young days.
Now the right is more important, this man is Oprys BROTHER, balding, fat, bad lower thirds, ogre ears.
This is all about the lottery, your parents can be ugly can still produce a gigachad, your parents can also be gigachad + gigastacy and produce an incel.
It's all about the lottery.
The blackpill here is stop coping and blaming your parents.

 

[Deleted member 110]

Nah just look at Barrets brothers.
They are walking abominations while he is a walking god.

My avi btw

 

[disillusioned]

Cope.

View attachment 431603
This is Oprys mother, a 3-4/10

View attachment 431602
On the left lies Oprys dad, a 5.5 at best in his young days.
Now the right is more important, this man is Oprys BROTHER, balding, fat, bad lower thirds, ogre ears.
This is all about the lottery, your parents can be ugly can still produce a gigachad, your parents can also be gigachad + gigastacy and produce an incel.
It's all about the lottery.
The blackpill here is stop coping and blaming your parents.

No, this is not how genetic inheritance works. While genetic inheritance from your parents may be partially random, it's not all random. The term "genetic lottery" is largely bullshit and a cope since it implies all humans just inherit genes randomly from a universally shared human gene pool. This isn't the case. 2 good looking healthy people are 10x more likely to produce a good looking and healthy offspring than 2 ugly people who's ancestry is riddled with genetic shortcomings. You are fucking deluded if you think otherwise. Not every single person born to chad&stacy parents is going to be chad/stacy, but the actual odds of being born ugly are much, much lower.

 

[Lev Peshkov]

No, this is not how genetic inheritance works. While genetic inheritance from your parents may be partially random, it's not all random. The term "genetic lottery" is largely bullshit and a cope since it implies all humans just inherit genes randomly from a universally shared human gene pool. This isn't the case. 2 good looking healthy people are 10x more likely to produce a good looking and healthy offspring than 2 ugly people who's ancestry is riddled with genetic shortcomings. You are fucking deluded if you think otherwise. Not every single person born to chad&stacy parents is going to be chad/stacy, but the actual odds of being born ugly are much, much lower.

exaclty, we know the gene that causes looks is also one that regukates T and HGH and other anolobilc hormones. try and tell me that gentics and hormones dont work together your retarded. Now woth high steroid hormones faces develp more attarctive (been proven check it out) and it proves the blackpill but it isnt over for new borns

 

[EasternRightWinger15]

yeah, I often think about this myself

 

[Deleted member 756]

Ugly woman + more attractive man will still make the next generation an improvement over the last one. I'm even an example of this. My father is 6/10 and my mother is 3. I'm about 4.

Pics or larp

 

[patricknotstar]

Think about it. Why else would there even exist ugly or mediocre looking people at all? Normies and incels are nothing more than the byproduct of thousands of years worth of rampant dysgenics produced by artificially enforced sexual equality in which almost all males got to breed almost regardless of genetic quality. If the 80/20 rule was actually applied since the very beginning we would all be chads with high IQ since inferior traits would be largely out of the gene pool. And before anybody says "women would just have higher standards"...maybe. But with genetic inequality between the extremes being less massive, it would be easier to compete.

Good post OP, but we would also live in the Stone Age because monogamy is what gives the average and inferior genetic males an incentive to cooperate with eachother to build advanced civilizations.

 

[disillusioned]

Good post OP, but we would also live in the Stone Age because monogamy is what gives the average and inferior genetic males an incentive to cooperate with eachother to build advanced civilizations.

Half truth. Monogamy means men with low T but high IQ can still have a chance to become sexually successful by getting married and having children. However this also comes at the expense of ugly men with inferior genetics and IQ also having children. Tbh it's questionable if enough high IQ men have children as a result of monogamy to even make up for all the lower IQ men who get to breed as well.

 

[HighIQcel]

I like your posts. Ones of the most legit among shitposting.

 

[lookismfugee]

wow no shit man

 

[Finalchad]

Thats when u get when incels make the rules. In the long run its better to let females chose. At least for genetics. Society will collapse