Morphing Tip: COMPACT That Fuarking Midface

[thecel]

Here’s a quick tip to solve a problem that I often encounter when I do side profile morphs.

I morphed a subhuman’s side profile along the depth axis, fixin his retruded maxilla and recessed chin. Unfortunately, he looked uncanny in the after, and it was not obvious what exactly the problem was.

The nonmorphed side profile didn’t appear to have a long midface to me, so I kept his nose and mouth at their original vertical levels and made his chin taller. This was a mistake.

After making the 1st morph, I found out that the problem was that his face was too long. I revised the morph, and he looks way better in the new one:

Don’t underestimate the importance of compact midfaces!

Think back to the basics of Mewing and orthotropics. When a face grows in a suboptimal way, it doesn’t just not grow forward; it grows downward as well. So, when you morph subhumans to give them better bone structure, make sure to advance their bones both forwards and upwards, not forwards only.

Summary: When morphing recessed faces, just giving them more forward bone projection can look uncanny. Try shortening their vertical facial heights.

 

[0hMan]

 

[spongebob]

The first one looks better. Long midface one looks better. Looks more high class and more intelligent.

 

[OnlyWs]

The eyebrow looks more uncanny than the midface tbh

 

[NordicLeonhard]

first looks way better

 

[Graham]

 

[Deleted member 40761]

 

[spongebob]

View attachment 2616624

2nd one looks better also. Longer midface looks better. It's like the frame of your face. Bigger frame I guess. Signals better growth. Just as height.

 

[thecel]

View attachment 2616624

ooolala

morph is rly hot

@Aloha

 

[Graham]

2nd one looks better also. Longer midface looks better. It's like the frame of your face. Bigger frame I guess. Signals better growth. Just as height.

I remember asking people years ago which one is better looking and they said "there's no difference" while all choosing the one on the right.

 

[Graham]

Good morph!
Shows how important a slender head and long midface is for males.

The lack of it is the reason Leo aged badly.

It's not mine though, I found it back when I was on here in 2019 or 2020 I think.

 

[Deleted member 28774]

ooolala

morph is rly hot

@Aloha

are u rly lady? honey?

 

[NordicLeonhard]

Why would you want to look more ogre by having short midface, I have it myself but longer mogs

 

[enchanted_elixir]

2nd looks so uncanny.

 

[thecel]

Good morph!
Shows how important a slender head and long midface is for males.

The lack of it is the reason Leo aged badly.

Slender (dolichocephalic) heads are ideal, but midfaces shouldn’t be “long”. It should have a balanced ratio, not overly compact and not excessively long.

 

[Deleted member 19968]

0.95-1.02 midface is ideal. Higher than that its a flaw and becomes SFS. legit no one has higher than that besides barrett and di caprio

 

[thecel]

2nd looks so uncanny.

insane cope

 

[thecel]

0.95-1.02 midface is ideal. Higher than that its a flaw and becomes SFS. legit no one has higher than that besides barrett and di caprio

gigacope

@Aloha 1.1 is ideal

 

[Deleted member 19968]

gigacope

View attachment 2616667

Just post black males theory lmfao what a fucking retard

 

[thecel]

Why would you want to look more ogre by having short midface, I have it myself but longer mogs

long midfaces look more ogre than short midfaces:

 

[NordicLeonhard]

long midfaces look more ogre than short midfaces:

View attachment 2616682

Thats african skull vs white

 

[Deleted member 19968]

gigacope

View attachment 2616667

@Aloha 1.1 is ideal

All gl male models or hollywood actors have sub 1 midface ratios or 1 at best. Drago 0.97, hexum 0.97, ballou 0.96. Chico and sean have 1:1 or so

 

[Allornothing]

No, the problem was you fucked up his eyelid. Nothing to do with midface length.

 

[Deleted member 19968]

All gl male models or hollywood actors have sub 1 midface ratios or 1 at best. Drago 0.97, hexum 0.97, ballou 0.96. Chico and sean have 1:1 or so

Actually long midface is death, longer middle third than upper or lower also low FWHR ( ideal is above 9 but lower than 1.8 it starts to become an issue ). But slightly longer midface is ideal 0.95-1.02 its also dimorphic and masculine. 1:1 is exact ideal

 

[Deleted member 21345]

ooolala

morph is rly hot

@Aloha

Lol you think he looks better on the right?

 

[thecel]

Thats african skull vs white

no retard, that’s a Neanderthal and a Cro-Magnon

 

[thecel]

Lol you think he looks better on the right?

yea

 

[NordicLeonhard]

no retard, that’s a Neanderthal and a Cro-Magnon

So its not a fair comparison at all

 

[thecel]

So its not a fair comparison at all

Neanderthals look more ogre than Cro-Magnons do

 

[mirrormogger]

yea

it might look better because of the big forehead being evened out though not necessarily the mid face itself

 

[Deleted member 29724]

intresting

 

[Deleted member 29724]

yea

eh nah but he prob aged better

 

[Deleted member 29724]

All gl male models or hollywood actors have sub 1 midface ratios or 1 at best. Drago 0.97, hexum 0.97, ballou 0.96. Chico and sean have 1:1 or so

good to know

 

[thecel]

View attachment 2616624

The 3 Archetypes — Prettyboy, Maesthetic, & Hypermasculine

 

[Graham]

The 3 Archetypes — Prettyboy, Maesthetic, & Hypermasculine

View attachment 2616771View attachment 2616770

Subhuman, Chad, Subhuman

 

[mvp2v1]

Here’s a quick tip to solve a problem that I often encounter when I do side profile morphs.

I morphed a subhuman’s side profile along the depth axis, fixin his retruded maxilla and recessed chin. Unfortunately, he looked uncanny in the after, and it was not obvious what exactly the problem was.

View attachment 2616593

The nonmorphed side profile didn’t appear to have a long midface to me, so I kept his nose and mouth at their original vertical levels and made his chin taller. This was a mistake.

After making the 1st morph, I found out that the problem was that his face was too long. I revised the morph, and he looks way better in the new one:

View attachment 2616623

Don’t underestimate the importance of compact midfaces!

Think back to the basics of Mewing and orthotropics. When a face grows in a suboptimal way, it doesn’t just not grow forward; it grows downward as well. So, when you morph subhumans to give them better bone structure, make sure to advance their bones both forwards and upwards, not forwards only.

View attachment 2616637

Summary: When morphing recessed faces, just giving them more forward bone projection can look uncanny. Try shortening their vertical facial heights.

Water.

 

[realt50]

Here’s a quick tip to solve a problem that I often encounter when I do side profile morphs.

I morphed a subhuman’s side profile along the depth axis, fixin his retruded maxilla and recessed chin. Unfortunately, he looked uncanny in the after, and it was not obvious what exactly the problem was.

View attachment 2616593

The nonmorphed side profile didn’t appear to have a long midface to me, so I kept his nose and mouth at their original vertical levels and made his chin taller. This was a mistake.

After making the 1st morph, I found out that the problem was that his face was too long. I revised the morph, and he looks way better in the new one:

View attachment 2616623

Don’t underestimate the importance of compact midfaces!

Think back to the basics of Mewing and orthotropics. When a face grows in a suboptimal way, it doesn’t just not grow forward; it grows downward as well. So, when you morph subhumans to give them better bone structure, make sure to advance their bones both forwards and upwards, not forwards only.

View attachment 2616637

Summary: When morphing recessed faces, just giving them more forward bone projection can look uncanny. Try shortening their vertical facial heights.

how much for a side morph boyo