can’t relate
Roped femboy
- Joined
- Jun 10, 2023
- Posts
- 539
- Reputation
- 738
Have you noticed the women many Chads end up with? They're usually LTB-MTB or, at best, HTB with the help of makeup.
It's rare for a Chad to be with a Stacy because Stacies have higher SMV and greater selective power due to hypergamy. The most attractive women don’t typically seek men on their same looks level. Instead, they look for hypergamous traits like financial resources.
Makeup-free Stacies—whether naturally beautiful or surgically enhanced to PSL standards (not the botched Barbie look)—tend to seek financial security and extreme wealth. They're often gold diggers. While a rich Chad is a bonus, it's rare. They generally go for ultra-rich men regardless of looks.
In fact, they often prefer men who are less attractive because it gives them more power in the relationship. A less attractive man is more likely to chase and invest in her, knowing that other men would want to take her from him. Stacies want to be spoiled and financially secure, so they choose rich, less attractive men over equally attractive Chads, who might not provide the same level of financial investment or princess treatment.
Chads don’t usually attract Stacies because they’re not the type of men Stacies want. To a Stacy, a Chad is just a use less oretty painting that doesn’t pay the bills or provide for her future, just stand there being pretty, making him essentially useless.
In contrast, Beckies will financially support a Chad, treating him like a god. But a Stacy sees a Chad as no better than a Normie if he isn’t very rich and able to provide for her.
I have a friend who's a PSL 7.8 with no makeup—she stands out so much that everyone notices her even when she’s dressed modestly. She once said, “A guy must always like you more than you like him.” In PSL terms, she wants to date a man less attractive than her so he'll treat her like a goddess. But she’s also money-obsessed and only looks for men who can provide. She doesn’t even notice Chads.
The only match for a drop-dead gorgeous, no-makeup Stacy in terms of dating value is probably a rich Chad.
It's rare for a Chad to be with a Stacy because Stacies have higher SMV and greater selective power due to hypergamy. The most attractive women don’t typically seek men on their same looks level. Instead, they look for hypergamous traits like financial resources.
Makeup-free Stacies—whether naturally beautiful or surgically enhanced to PSL standards (not the botched Barbie look)—tend to seek financial security and extreme wealth. They're often gold diggers. While a rich Chad is a bonus, it's rare. They generally go for ultra-rich men regardless of looks.
In fact, they often prefer men who are less attractive because it gives them more power in the relationship. A less attractive man is more likely to chase and invest in her, knowing that other men would want to take her from him. Stacies want to be spoiled and financially secure, so they choose rich, less attractive men over equally attractive Chads, who might not provide the same level of financial investment or princess treatment.
Chads don’t usually attract Stacies because they’re not the type of men Stacies want. To a Stacy, a Chad is just a use less oretty painting that doesn’t pay the bills or provide for her future, just stand there being pretty, making him essentially useless.
In contrast, Beckies will financially support a Chad, treating him like a god. But a Stacy sees a Chad as no better than a Normie if he isn’t very rich and able to provide for her.
I have a friend who's a PSL 7.8 with no makeup—she stands out so much that everyone notices her even when she’s dressed modestly. She once said, “A guy must always like you more than you like him.” In PSL terms, she wants to date a man less attractive than her so he'll treat her like a goddess. But she’s also money-obsessed and only looks for men who can provide. She doesn’t even notice Chads.
The only match for a drop-dead gorgeous, no-makeup Stacy in terms of dating value is probably a rich Chad.
Last edited:
