Most men are parasites and wouldn't even exist in nature

[disillusioned]

Look at the way it works in nature where there are no complex social systems that require men for economic or political reasons. Most of the males are usually either just killed by the alpha (e.g. lions) or they starve to death because they can't establish themselves properly, or they're eaten/driven away by the female if she's the bigger one in that species.

The uselessness of surplus males is especially evident in farming/agriculture, where the farmer usually only keeps the best males (e.g. the alphas) for breeding stock, and kills all the other ones instantly. Only the females are kept as actual cattle. And this goes for cows, chickens, pigs, etc.

The fact of the matter is, there is no evolutionary reason why a species needs a large number of males. The idea of having an equal number of men and women is an unnatural consequence of the complexities of human economy and social structures. If you are a man, and you are not the top 5-10% genetically fit, you're automatically a parasite on the species.

 

[Vincent Freeman]

- neet

 

[disillusioned]

- neet

It's not just neets. Most men are useless in general, even the ones in 'jobs'.

 

[rape]

none of this applies to me because im autistic which means id be the designated hunter & gatherer due to my great pattern recognition autism was the next step in caveman development

 

[looksmaxxed]

the only men of value in the current environment are people who kill jews and niggers and are actively involved in the project of eugenic culling

if you kill genetic shit, you will be rewarded with sexy and reproduction, this is genetic law.

 

[KD6Imp33]

Spoken like a men hating Feminazi.
Men are needed for the women and children to survive.
Men were the hunters because they're strong and carried the killed animals for miles, women were the gatherers because they're weak, they picked cherries and mushrooms.
They also need men to protect them from everything, because "muh strong and independend woman" is a delusion.
Feminazis create gay sociopaths like Hitler:

 

[gymcel64]

yes, and you're one of them.

 

[neurosis]

good thread and i completely agree

if governments were smart, theyd implement a eugenics program and sustain an unbalanced gender ratio of 80:20 - female:male. Not only does this remove most, if not all of the issues derived from sexual selection, it prevents the futile suffering and existences of genetically unfortunate disposable males

t. genetically unfortunate, disposable male

 

[neurosis]

Most men are useless in general, even the ones in 'jobs'.

they give taxes to the state which allows genetically superior specimens to proliferate their genes

 

[Meteor21]

Oh shut up, the same applies to women too then, looks serve no purpose, Chad isn't gonna live longer, women don't select for intelligence anyways. Vanity is your god. Every day you babble absolute nonsense, no whitepills in sight. "Muh we were put on this earth to breed." Circular logic nonsense.

 

[optimisticzoomer]

- neet

Thread describes you perfectly

 

[johnathansmithston]

Look at the way it works in nature where there are no complex social systems that require men for economic or political reasons. Most of the males are usually either just killed by the alpha (e.g. lions) or they starve to death because they can't establish themselves properly, or they're eaten/driven away by the female if she's the bigger one in that species.

The uselessness of surplus males is especially evident in farming/agriculture, where the farmer usually only keeps the best males (e.g. the alphas) for breeding stock, and kills all the other ones instantly. Only the females are kept as actual cattle. And this goes for cows, chickens, pigs, etc.

The fact of the matter is, there is no evolutionary reason why a species needs a large number of males. The idea of having an equal number of men and women is an unnatural consequence of the complexities of human economy and social structures. If you are a man, and you are not the top 5-10% genetically fit, you're automatically a parasite on the species.

Why should i care about what i would be in caveman times thoughbeit

 

[neurosis]

Oh shut up, the same applies to woman too then, looks serve no purpose

no matter how subhuman a woman is, theyre inherently valuable bc of their invaluable ovaries and eggs

 

[Meteor21]

no matter how subhuman a woman is, theyre inherently valuable bc of their invaluable ovaries and eggs

Which is retarded because they're responsible for 50% of your offspring's genes and will be the reason they end up incel

 

[WBC323]

What is a genetically top man? Is it the most goodlooking? Definetly not. The biggesf? The fastest? It can be many different things and combinations so dont be baby's first ever idea guy and think more about the things you write.

 

[neurosis]

Which is retarded because they're responsible for 50% of your offspring's genes and will be the reason they end up incel

i agree lol, nature is retarded and should be rengineered to perfection my man-made engineering (the parasitic disposable subchad men in ops post)

 

[Beastimmung]

One of the reasons why wars are needed

 

[neurosis]

One of the reasons why wars are needed

completely unnecessary and barbaric means of culling the herd

just legalise commercial gene editing and keep the prospective demographic of males relatively low

 

[Vincent Freeman]

Thread describes you perfectly

great, projection from a parasite

 

[optimisticzoomer]

great, projection from a parasite

(Highest amassed time on the forum)

 

[optimisticzoomer]

none of this applies to me because im autistic which means id be the designated hunter & gatherer due to my great pattern recognition autism was the next step in caveman development

Autism just means one of a few things: low intelligence, low social intelligence, poor habit control, or a dislike of people

 

[Beastimmung]

completely unnecessary and barbaric means of culling the herd

just legalise commercial gene editing and keep the prospective demographic of males relatively low

Extremly low T

 

[neurosis]

Extremly high IQ

is what you meant

 

[looksmaxxed]

completely unnecessary and barbaric means of culling the herd

just legalise commercial gene editing and keep the prospective demographic of males relatively low

you're never going to technocuck your way out of biology. you are not smart enough to understand why nature does what it does. wars and brutality are necessary. and ultimately, people like you need to be killed(and will be) because you are trying to bring about total technocratic dystopia via slavery to ai gene editing to optimize humans into the perfect insect drone.

 

[optimisticzoomer]

Extremly low T

When someone disagrees with something, they call it "low T". When they agree, it's "high T"

That's the way of the forum

looksmax.org

 

[neurosis]

because you are trying to bring about total technocratic dystopia via slavery to ai gene editing to optimize humans into the perfect insect drone.

game is game

if normies were high iq enough to foresee what's happening right before their eyes, theyd be able to prevent it from happening (they wont)

about total technocratic dystopia

dystopia for the losers, sure.

 

[neurosis]

you're never going to technocuck your way out of biology

also

the entire history of humanity is us technocuking our way out of biology - why do you think the inevitable next step (turning normies into soulless work drones, which btw they already are) will be any different.

luddites never fail to amaze me with their low sentience

 

[johnathansmithston]

Look at the way it works in nature where there are no complex social systems that require men for economic or political reasons. Most of the males are usually either just killed by the alpha (e.g. lions) or they starve to death because they can't establish themselves properly, or they're eaten/driven away by the female if she's the bigger one in that species.

The uselessness of surplus males is especially evident in farming/agriculture, where the farmer usually only keeps the best males (e.g. the alphas) for breeding stock, and kills all the other ones instantly. Only the females are kept as actual cattle. And this goes for cows, chickens, pigs, etc.

The fact of the matter is, there is no evolutionary reason why a species needs a large number of males. The idea of having an equal number of men and women is an unnatural consequence of the complexities of human economy and social structures. If you are a man, and you are not the top 5-10% genetically fit, you're automatically a parasite on the species.

Btw why compare humans to 50 random animals instead of actual ancient wild humans

 

[disillusioned]

looks serve no purpose

This is false. Good looks are a genetic marker for good traits.

 

[Meteor21]

This is false. Good looks are a genetic marker for good traits.

They correlate, slightly, so long as you aren't dysgenic, tall people still die younger.

 

[Deleted member 157548]

Humans are group selected, dumbo.

 

[Deleted member 78687]

It's not just neets. Most men are useless in general, even the ones in 'jobs'.

wait till bro finds out the large majority of police officers, fire wardens, builders, electricians, mechanics and pretty much any other job we need to survive nowadays are run by men

 

[disillusioned]

wait till bro finds out the large majority of police officers, fire wardens, builders, electricians, mechanics and pretty much any other job we need to survive nowadays are run by men

You handpicked very specific jobs are done by only a small minority of men. Also fucking lol at picking police officers as an example when they're fucking useless irl and are just glorified henchmen for the elites.

 

[incel-at-heart]

Look at the way it works in nature where there are no complex social systems that require men for economic or political reasons. Most of the males are usually either just killed by the alpha (e.g. lions) or they starve to death because they can't establish themselves properly, or they're eaten/driven away by the female if she's the bigger one in that species.

The uselessness of surplus males is especially evident in farming/agriculture, where the farmer usually only keeps the best males (e.g. the alphas) for breeding stock, and kills all the other ones instantly. Only the females are kept as actual cattle. And this goes for cows, chickens, pigs, etc.

The fact of the matter is, there is no evolutionary reason why a species needs a large number of males. The idea of having an equal number of men and women is an unnatural consequence of the complexities of human economy and social structures. If you are a man, and you are not the top 5-10% genetically fit, you're automatically a parasite on the species.

Animals with more complex social relationships (apes, elephants, ...) also have excess males, and they don't necessarily die off. Many times they gather into groups of beta incels and just fool around with no big purpose. They also develop a hierarchy of their own, with the incel alpha sometimes challenging conventional alphas (this is what Clav is doing now).

For humans, thanks to the hybrid mating strategy of foids, incel excess males are immensely useful to betabuxx for Chad's biological children that they present as the cuck's. Also these excess incels can work for alpha CEOs, foids and their children while demanding just a playstation and food. Easy to abuse, but still genetically worthless beyond reinforcing the safety of Chad's progeny.

That's not parasitism, that's filler individuals who act as sacrificial material for the healthy core humans.