dreamcake1mo
Mistral
- Joined
- May 12, 2022
- Posts
- 2,178
- Reputation
- 3,176
Is this why women on a federal level hate trump?
He goes against what an innate (sophistic and sociopathic/parasitical) biological imperative does on a day to day basis, which is to leech on, and less likely to be interested in decentralized leading/ and growing and useful industries. Instead, they tend to suck things dry, and create forms of mental gymnastics to why their utilization is anything but a waste of time and money. The majority of social services go to women, despite statistically men doing the harder, service, at a higher frequency as well as staggering facts about male sucide rates.
This is also how you noticed, when Elon musk fired a bunch of "day in the life of" useless twitter women (By the way, those same ones who sat back during 2019-2020 and censored all of our posts), when he bought twitter, he left the jeets and native devs on team, mainly removing the useless women-only gatekeeper higher management.
Don't get me wrong, everyone needs a job. And a future where ai takes care of the majority of labor systems, humanity as a WHOLE will need to be righteous enough to be able to pay each other fair wages for doing essentially nothing. But are we there yet? Hell no.
The psychological development levels of the majority of people, black and white are still at the levels of a primate. At best it is a money see- monkey do situation, where the only path to evolution is to imitate human level behavior, and you notice this. How people cant seem to do right in the face of self agency, but only when a government force or authority forces punishment can they behave properly. The way of evolution for most people is a test of obedience more than anything. But, can these types of people live in a world where wealth is gained fairly and you are free to do what you want with it? In short, can these people embrace differences?
Women as a gender still preach equality without fairness, and their behavior has become like a angry spoiled child, that child who has leaders which consider their input for things far to important than what their psychological development levels can handle. We currently still live in a system where the majority of men who have/do put in the hardest physical and mental work, still get paid far lower than those who do nothing and don't have to use their brain. Which is why the shift to prioritizing basic systems outlined in a patriarchal society, including a favor towards psychological prepositions men excel in, like logical and rational processes, and less of socio-emotional ones, like less divergent/fringe fame based systems such as the ones occupied primarily with the people highlighted in the twitter post.
You cant grow a tree in the middle of the ocean and expect people to eat its fruit. The evolution must start with proper systems as the base, which is why it may seem that trumps admin (the systems the people surrounded by the admin prioritize) seem to be far more innovative, interesting, non stagnant and wealthy.
But also why women and some (misguided but still divergent/democratic) idealists feel threatened, globally by the admin.
He goes against what an innate (sophistic and sociopathic/parasitical) biological imperative does on a day to day basis, which is to leech on, and less likely to be interested in decentralized leading/ and growing and useful industries. Instead, they tend to suck things dry, and create forms of mental gymnastics to why their utilization is anything but a waste of time and money. The majority of social services go to women, despite statistically men doing the harder, service, at a higher frequency as well as staggering facts about male sucide rates.
This is also how you noticed, when Elon musk fired a bunch of "day in the life of" useless twitter women (By the way, those same ones who sat back during 2019-2020 and censored all of our posts), when he bought twitter, he left the jeets and native devs on team, mainly removing the useless women-only gatekeeper higher management.
Don't get me wrong, everyone needs a job. And a future where ai takes care of the majority of labor systems, humanity as a WHOLE will need to be righteous enough to be able to pay each other fair wages for doing essentially nothing. But are we there yet? Hell no.
The psychological development levels of the majority of people, black and white are still at the levels of a primate. At best it is a money see- monkey do situation, where the only path to evolution is to imitate human level behavior, and you notice this. How people cant seem to do right in the face of self agency, but only when a government force or authority forces punishment can they behave properly. The way of evolution for most people is a test of obedience more than anything. But, can these types of people live in a world where wealth is gained fairly and you are free to do what you want with it? In short, can these people embrace differences?
Women as a gender still preach equality without fairness, and their behavior has become like a angry spoiled child, that child who has leaders which consider their input for things far to important than what their psychological development levels can handle. We currently still live in a system where the majority of men who have/do put in the hardest physical and mental work, still get paid far lower than those who do nothing and don't have to use their brain. Which is why the shift to prioritizing basic systems outlined in a patriarchal society, including a favor towards psychological prepositions men excel in, like logical and rational processes, and less of socio-emotional ones, like less divergent/fringe fame based systems such as the ones occupied primarily with the people highlighted in the twitter post.
You cant grow a tree in the middle of the ocean and expect people to eat its fruit. The evolution must start with proper systems as the base, which is why it may seem that trumps admin (the systems the people surrounded by the admin prioritize) seem to be far more innovative, interesting, non stagnant and wealthy.
But also why women and some (misguided but still divergent/democratic) idealists feel threatened, globally by the admin.