Most women are with their looks match

[supergoat972]

I went to a wealthy, mostly all white church today and I saw some of the couples. Fat women were almost always with other fat men. The good looking and college Chad men were with Stacies.

Same in Walmarts, Fast food joints and government offices. Most landwhales are with other fat men, niggers or low income men. At my office, almost all the landwhales are with other overweight/obese men besides this one skinny, latina literal dwarf who is with a skinny short nigger. Only 2 women are with high value men and they are both slim blondes in their 40. One is with a handsome, tall man and the other is with an average looking man who earns around $250,000.

You are thinking of Tinder/Bumble matches . You have to remember that 80%+ of men on those apps are low quality- overweight/obese, low income etc. or bots/AI/fake accounts. Most men swipe right on everyone or just want cyber sex. Yeah, they get 1,000 matches and 100 messages but 90% of these messages are from low quality men-fat men, niggers, bots/AI etc.

They can EASILY get their looks match via online dating, but stop women on a pedestal by claiming that they all get access to these "Chads" or high value/successful men. They don't , and the ones who do must be FIT or ultra wealthy.

 

[5.5psl]

not true bro ltbs are dating chads and sub htns are coping with their right hand
i have nor left my basement since months btw

 

[mrdouchebag]

105 men born for every 100 women born. The equivalent of a woman in the 50th percentile of female physical attractiveness is a man in the 52th percentile of male physical attractiveness. The leeway women have when it comes to long term relationships is negligible.

So of course the vast majority of women date their looksmatch. Hotter men are snatched by hotter women. The people at the top have the first pick, not the people in the middle or bottom. Unless for some reason people believe hotter women prefer to stay single and hotter men prefer to get in relationships, which doesn't make sense at all, if anything it's the opposite. More attractive(facially) women have less lifetime short term partners and more lifetime longterm partners compared to less attractive women. More attractive(facially) men have more lifetime short term sexual partners and around the same lifetime longterm partners compared to less attractive men.

If anything, it's more common for men to date above their looksmatch, because men are much more willing to take initiative and leverage high levels of social status and money(if they have it of course) in order to date more attractive(but poorer and lower status) women compared to what they would have otherwise gotten.

Women only have much more leeway when it comes to casual sex, because men are willing to fuck down in looks if it takes little to no effort and investment. But when it comes to forming relationships, there is no charity. Either both get a good deal or noone does. Unless we're talking about cases where extreme levels of luck is involved, but exceptions always exist.

 

[supergoat972]

105 men born for every 100 women born. The equivalent of a woman in the 50th percentile of female physical attractiveness is a man in the 52th percentile of male physical attractiveness. The leeway women have when it comes to long term relationships is negligible.

So of course the vast majority of women date their looksmatch. Hotter men are snatched by hotter women. The people at the top have the first pick, not the people in the middle or bottom. Unless for some reason people believe hotter women prefer to stay single and hotter men prefer to get in relationships, which doesn't make sense at all, if anything it's the opposite. More attractive(facially) women have less lifetime short term partners and more lifetime longterm partners compared to less attractive women. More attractive(facially) men have more lifetime short term sexual partners and around the same lifetime longterm partners compared to less attractive men.

If anything, it's more common for men to date above their looksmatch, because men are much more willing to take initiative and leverage high levels of social status and money(if they have it of course) in order to date more attractive(but poorer and lower status) women compared to what they would have otherwise gotten.

Women only have much more leeway when it comes to casual sex, because men are willing to fuck down in looks if it takes little to no effort and investment. But when it comes to forming relationships, there is no charity. Either both get a good deal or noone does. Unless we're talking about cases where extreme levels of luck is involved, but exceptions always exist.

Good points.

i'm so tired of all these incels (ironically) putting women on a pedestal by telling them that all men are pigs who will date them no matter how fat/ugly they get. By lying to women that they all have access to top tire men, they are inflating their ego and lying to them.


That is NOT true. They don't all have access to high value men, and the ones who do must be FIT or ultra wealthy. Matching or having cyber sex with a high value man on some Jew dating app like Tinder or Instagram does not mean you can be with them.

 

[MulletM1chas]

I went to a wealthy, mostly all white church today and I saw some of the couples. Fat women were almost always with other fat men. The good looking and college Chad men were with Stacies.

Same in Walmarts, Fast food joints and government offices. Most landwhales are with other fat men, niggers or low income men. At my office, almost all the landwhales are with other overweight/obese men besides this one skinny, latina literal dwarf who is with a skinny short nigger. Only 2 women are with high value men and they are both slim blondes in their 40. One is with a handsome, tall man and the other is with an average looking man who earns around $250,000.

You are thinking of Tinder/Bumble matches . You have to remember that 80%+ of men on those apps are low quality- overweight/obese, low income etc. or bots/AI/fake accounts. Most men swipe right on everyone or just want cyber sex. Yeah, they get 1,000 matches and 100 messages but 90% of these messages are from low quality men-fat men, niggers, bots/AI etc.

They can EASILY get their looks match via online dating, but stop women on a pedestal by claiming that they all get access to these "Chads" or high value/successful men. They don't , and the ones who do must be FIT or ultra wealthy.

Im not beliving it, if its real its ultra rare image maybe on the higher level of society maybe but in midlle class ltbs want Chads and they are fucking whores its hard to find Virgin in middle class not mentioning lover class