Multiregional Evolution Hypothesis vs. Out Of Africa Theory

[EthiopianMaxxer]

What are your thoughts on the multiregional hypothesis, contrary to the common Out Of Africa evolution theory, where the first homo genusus started in Africa. It is argued that the Out Of Africa theory was the most plausible scenario at the time, so anthropologists and archaeologists looked for evidence to prove it, rather than to disprove it and actually work to find the real theory.

The multiregional hypothesis is actually controversial, because some anthropologists disregarded it, considering it "debunked" as it is "racist" jfl.

I might make a longer thread on it in the future, you can just read articles/watch videos about each topic if you don't know much about it

Multiregional origin of modern humans - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Recent African origin of modern humans - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

 

[EthiopianMaxxer]

@registerfasterusing @Jason Voorhees @Chadeep @Gengar @kurd

 

[registerfasterusing]

What are your thoughts on the multiregional hypothesis, contrary to the common Out Of Africa evolution theory, where the first homo genusus started in Africa. It is argued that the Out Of Africa theory was the most plausible scenario at the time, so anthropologists and archaeologists looked for evidence to prove it, rather than to disprove it and actually work to find the real theory.

The multiregional hypothesis is actually controversial, because some anthropologists disregarded it, considering it "debunked" as it is "racist" jfl.

I might make a longer thread on it in the future, you can just read articles/watch videos about each topic if you don't know much about it

Multiregional origin of modern humans - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Recent African origin of modern humans - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Honestly makes a lot more sense
Some of the out of Africa migrations js seem weird
Like in terms of them circling back to the same places multiple times

 

[EthiopianMaxxer]

@greycel @Looks over NT @Debetro @Saint Casanova @optimisticzoomer

 

[Debetro]

Out of africa is a meme

 

[Netanyahu]

Africa was promised to us 3000 years ago

 

[acm]

BBC backshts

 

[EthiopianMaxxer]

@buddyboyos i see u lurking

 

[TheStonerOne]

Humans undoubtedly came from Africa. Africa itself is where the majority of human diversity is and this lessens the further away one is from Africa.

The reason most non-Africans aren't black is due to selective pressures amongst other things. But these don't create seperate subspecies.

When we use terms like "Western Eurasian" or "Eastern Eurasian" these are continental or subcontinental terms but they do not indicate "race". The lowest figure for human genetic similarity was 99.3%. In reality, it's ~99.5% with the average being ~99.8%.

 

[psychomandible]

Humans undoubtedly came from Africa. Africa itself is where the majority of human diversity is and this lessens the further away one is from Africa.

The reason most non-Africans aren't black is due to selective pressures amongst other things. But these don't create seperate subspecies.

When we use terms like "Western Eurasian" or "Eastern Eurasian" these are continental or subcontinental terms but they do not indicate "race". The lowest figure for human genetic similarity was 99.3%. In reality, it's ~99.5% with the average being ~99.8%.

We have sperate species of other animal groups who are closer genetically then bantus and english. Multi regional is pretty much proven but isn't outright called that.

You do know the main difference of species categorisation is phenotypic right ? This is why we had species categorisation before genetic research and so why would genetic mutations that drastically change phenotype and inner processing not be ground's for species categorisation?

Btw im not talking about muh black race white race categorisation beacuse that's stupid

 

[psychomandible]

What are your thoughts on the multiregional hypothesis, contrary to the common Out Of Africa evolution theory, where the first homo genusus started in Africa. It is argued that the Out Of Africa theory was the most plausible scenario at the time, so anthropologists and archaeologists looked for evidence to prove it, rather than to disprove it and actually work to find the real theory.

The multiregional hypothesis is actually controversial, because some anthropologists disregarded it, considering it "debunked" as it is "racist" jfl.

I might make a longer thread on it in the future, you can just read articles/watch videos about each topic if you don't know much about it

Multiregional origin of modern humans - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Recent African origin of modern humans - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Aarvoll did a good video on this

 

[optimisticzoomer]

Out of africa is a meme

You just can’t accept that’s our natural habitat

 

[EthiopianMaxxer]

You do know the main difference of species categorisation is phenotypic right ? This is why we had species categorisation before genetic research and so why would genetic mutations that drastically change phenotype and inner processing not be ground's for species categorisation?

Good point

Aarvoll did a good video on this

Thanks, I added it to watch later

 

[the_machinist_786]

MRE is nonsense

 

[EthiopianMaxxer]

MRE is nonsense

Why?

 

[EvilSatanArseRapist]

some anthropologists

*ideologues.

 

[the_machinist_786]

Why?

Haplogroups + archaeology + general archaeogenetics. There is zero evidence of homo sapiens in Eurasia and Australia before 70K BCE. Literally all the evidence strongly favours OoA and MRE doesn't have a single hard evidence on its side, the only evidence it has is stupid ahh incelologist claims like this:-

"You do know the main difference of species categorisation is phenotypic right ? This is why we had species categorisation before genetic research and so why would genetic mutations that drastically change phenotype and inner processing not be ground's for species categorisation?"

 

[buddyboyos]

@buddyboyos i see u lurking
View attachment 4167137

dnr

 

[unstable]

We have sperate species of other animal groups who are closer genetically then bantus and english. Multi regional is pretty much proven but isn't outright called that.

You do know the main difference of species categorisation is phenotypic right ? This is why we had species categorisation before genetic research and so why would genetic mutations that drastically change phenotype and inner processing not be ground's for species categorisation?

Btw im not talking about muh black race white race categorisation beacuse that's stupid

this nigga is smart, but you forgot that along with phenotype it is whether the population is interbreedable too.
also multiregional is just out of africa but pushed further back in time.

Humans undoubtedly came from Africa. Africa itself is where the majority of human diversity is and this lessens the further away one is from Africa.

The reason most non-Africans aren't black is due to selective pressures amongst other things. But these don't create seperate subspecies.

When we use terms like "Western Eurasian" or "Eastern Eurasian" these are continental or subcontinental terms but they do not indicate "race". The lowest figure for human genetic similarity was 99.3%. In reality, it's ~99.5% with the average being ~99.8%.

 

[EvilSatanArseRapist]

It is probably a mix between the two.
Which is also the consensus among anthropologists and archeogeneticists who take themselves seriously.
But still, out of africa is supported by evidence.

 

[psychomandible]

this nigga is smart, but you forgot that along with phenotype it is whether the population is interbreedable too.
also multiregional is just out of africa but pushed further back in time.

Interbreeding isn't really otherwise Neanderthal wouldn't be a separate species from homo sapian, I think also foxes and coyotes can interbreed aswell ?

 

[unstable]

Interbreeding isn't really otherwise Neanderthal wouldn't be a separate species from homo sapian, I think also foxes and coyotes can interbreed aswell ?

yeah but most species can't interbreed with fertile offspring. Species is just a manmade term doesn't matter if blacks are same species as white it is just a convention, dogs like humans look wildly different but are same species.

 

[psychomandible]

yeah but most species can't interbreed with fertile offspring. Species is just a manmade term doesn't matter if blacks are same species as white it is just a convention, dogs like humans look wildly different but are same species.

Dogs unlike humans are breed to be different while humans have natural genetic drift and phenotypic change from environment and such, that's why a north slav and anglo look different even tho their genes are virtually identical

 

[unstable]

Dogs unlike humans are breed to be different while humans have natural genetic drift and phenotypic change from environment and such, that's why a north slav and anglo look different even tho their genes are virtually identical

what about cows they look vastly different too and weren't bred to do so, this change is cause but sudden increase in population and small founding group.

 

[Debetro]

Haplogroups + archaeology + general archaeogenetics. There is zero evidence of homo sapiens in Eurasia and Australia before 70K BCE. Literally all the evidence strongly favours OoA and MRE doesn't have a single hard evidence on its side, the only evidence it has is stupid ahh incelologist claims like this:-

"You do know the main difference of species categorisation is phenotypic right ? This is why we had species categorisation before genetic research and so why would genetic mutations that drastically change phenotype and inner processing not be ground's for species categorisation?"

Proceeds to write "stupid ahh incelologist"
@psychomandible

 

[BaldAutistV2]

What are your thoughts on the multiregional hypothesis, contrary to the common Out Of Africa evolution theory, where the first homo genusus started in Africa. It is argued that the Out Of Africa theory was the most plausible scenario at the time, so anthropologists and archaeologists looked for evidence to prove it, rather than to disprove it and actually work to find the real theory.

The multiregional hypothesis is actually controversial, because some anthropologists disregarded it, considering it "debunked" as it is "racist" jfl.

I might make a longer thread on it in the future, you can just read articles/watch videos about each topic if you don't know much about it

Multiregional origin of modern humans - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Recent African origin of modern humans - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Niggas are pea brains they not like us

 

[FutureSlayer]

Finally some good threads

 

[psychomandible]

Proceeds to write "stupid ahh incelologist"
@psychomandible

Fag couldn't tag me lmao what a cuck

 

[psychomandible]

what about cows they look vastly different too and weren't bred to do so, this change is cause but sudden increase in population and small founding group.

That is a good question that I don't have an answer for but alot of cows are breed to be different but it's not as substantial as dog breeding.