MUSCLE INSERTIONS AND AESTHETICS. A SHORT VISUAL GUIDE FOR THE GYMCEL

loyolaxavvierretard

loyolaxavvierretard

𝕯𝖝𝕯 π–ˆπ–—π–Šπ–œ . Alonso
Joined
Mar 1, 2025
Posts
5,226
Reputation
8,926
INTRODUCTION
1. WHAT ARE MUSCLE INSERTIONS :-
iu


a. In anatomy, every skeletal muscle has two main attachment points -- The origin which is fixed or less movable and closer to the center of the body. The secon main attachment point is the insertion the movable attachment point which is usually farther from the center.

b. When a muscle contracts, the insertion moves towards the origin and produces a movement at the joint. The length of the muscle belly depends on where it inserts and hugely influences body aesthetics, and muscle shape.




BICEPS AESTHETICS
2. PEAK VS LENGTH :-
iu


a. A higher muscle belly means more more dramatic peak but less overall mass potential

b. A lower muscle belly means more overall mass potential but less peak.

c. Ideal muscle insertion is low insertion with a long muscle belly extending closer to the elbow. This is ideal because it results in a fuller bicep appearance. But people with higher insertions can get that mountain look even if the bicep isn't that huge.

d. Can you guess Arnold's muscle insertions ? His are truly insane biceps



CALVES
3. CALF GENETICS :-
iu


a. High insertion calves are long and thin and harder to grow. Long thin muscles are harder to fill and this would be the most genetically determined thing in bodybuilding. There are few ways to outcompete a true calves monster like Mike Matarazzo shown in the above picture.

b. Ideal insertions are low insertions which provide a fuller calf appearance and is more responsive to trainig. These result in thick and full calves which are ideal for aesthetics.


LATS
4. WIDTH AND THE V-TAPER :-
proxy-image


a. Low lat insertions create the V-taper Super Man look that looks ideal from both the front and back poses. It is ideal to have and is the source of the "anime back" memes that showcase gargantuan backs.

b.Higher insertions result in lats that flare out later and dont result in the cape look that is dramatic from both the front and back poses.

c. The man posted here is Serge Nubret. He has an ideal V-taper due to his size and ideal positioning of the lats. This muscle is extremely important to have to give the illusion of size even if you are not a mass monster. This is the make or break for aesthetics since it influences both the front and the back.



ABS
5. SYMMETRY AND DEPTH
proxy-image


a. Here insertion points and shape are more important than the size potential. Muscle segmentation is also crucial to achieve symmetry.

b. Shape and Symmetry are king and define the look. But like calves they are genetic. You will have to work around them if you dont have it.

c. Ideal insertions are even and symmetric insertions that contribute to an aesthetically pleasing look and are well defined. The given example is not a bodybuilder this time but his abs are still aesthetic. His name is Lazar Angelov




CHEST
6. PECTORAL MUSCLES :-
iu


a. This is another one of your make or break in terms of aesthetics in my humble opinion. If you have ideal chest insertions then with training you can build a stunner upper body, combined with lats. The ideal lats and chest combo can give size and the look if trained well. It is the ticket to looking like a Golden Era Classical contender.

b. Ideal insertions are symmetric without a gap between the pecs. This gap is mostly due to high insertions (I have it) that create the pec gap. Mike Tyson also has that gap so check him out if you would like to see some examples

c. Lower insertions produce a fuller chest and looks better with poses and in clothes. With the right size you can also fill out your shirts and T-shirts to look like that villian in the Spider Man comics (forgot his name). Arnold had perhaps the best chest genetics in his time unrivalled by all his contemporaries.

TRICEPS
7. THE HORSESHOE :-
iu


a. The triceps like all other muscles are ideal when inserted low.

b. A low insertion allows for an overall fuller tricep. This enhances the arm's mass and comlements the bicep to make your arms look ginormous

c. The man in this photo Mark Ruhl is a mass monster but still he has the perfect example of what I mean when I say a "horseshoe" tricep. His tricep is so huge it actually gives shape and size to his arm contributing to a comic book look.




DELTS
8. ROUND DELTS :-
iu


a. Yeah, I know I tagged a roider once again, but take a look at his delts. What stands out from the other delts that you see around your average gym mass monster ? The shape and the definition

b. Delts have 3 heads - anterior, posterior and the lateral. The ideal insertion here yet again is a low muscle belly with a high point near the clavicle and scalpula and long muscle bellies down the arm bone.

c. This results in a round 3-D shoulders. A wide upper body from both the front and back. Also there should be a clear separation between the delts, arm and and chest especially when you are lean. This is automatics with leanness and good size




CAN YOU TRAIN AROUND BAD GENETICS ?

a. You cannot change your genetics with training so if you have poor genetics in any one of these you will have to get over it. Honestly, it's not even that of a big deal since a lot of well regarded bodybuilders didnt have top tier genetics in all areas yet still created aesthetic pysiques (Classical only not Open).

b. There are plenty of great guides in Best of The Best section for building size and mass. A good thumb of rule is that a bad muscle looks better when big than when small (common sense) so you can still train and have them thick, full and conditioned. Focus on dense-under-tension training and you will build mass with time.

c. You should put an emphasis on complementary muscles. For e.g. Small calves should be complemented with built hamstrings and quads to make your leg look fuller. Short lats should be complemented with built rear delts, teres major and upper back thickness to give an illusion of a wider back


d. Muscles with high insertions need more volume and frequency to catch up aesthetically. So your priority should be to train lagging body parts atleast 2x times a week using different rep ranges than normal
NOTE - YOU DON'T NEED TO BE A MASS MONSTER TO ACHIEVE AN IDEAL PHYSIQUE. WHILE THE EXAMPLES POSTED HERE ARE VERY LIKELY ON STEROIDS, YOU CAN STILL CREATE AN AESTHETIC PHYSIQUE NATURALLY IF YOU HAVE THE RIGHT TRAINING REGIMEN AND THE GENETICS.


@whitebitchslayer @Aviddegree40571 @Gonthar @superpsycho

 
Last edited:
  • +1
  • Love it
Reactions: The Homelander, Volksstaffel, Arthur the Egyptian and 24 others
@menas @wishIwasSalludon @Whatever @Aven @Sorrowandsuffering
 
  • +1
Reactions: Underdog9494, R1PPer, Aviddegree40571 and 6 others
@chudlite @Loruki
 
  • +1
Reactions: Underdog9494, R1PPer, Aviddegree40571 and 6 others
@666PSL
 
  • +1
Reactions: Underdog9494, R1PPer, Aviddegree40571 and 4 others
bmp
 
  • +1
Reactions: Underdog9494, R1PPer, Aviddegree40571 and 4 others
Outdated guide
This is from the 1930s
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Underdog9494, R1PPer, DarkAscender and 3 others
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Underdog9494, R1PPer, Aviddegree40571 and 4 others
@War_In_Chiraq
 
  • +1
Reactions: Underdog9494, R1PPer, Aviddegree40571 and 3 others
dnrd water
 
  • +1
  • WTF
Reactions: Underdog9494, R1PPer, davidlaidisme67 and 4 others
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Underdog9494, R1PPer, Aviddegree40571 and 4 others
INTRODUCTION
1. WHAT ARE MUSCLE INSERTIONS :-
iu


a. In anatomy, every skeletal muscle has two main attachment points -- The origin which is fixed or less movable and closer to the center of the body. The secon main attachment point is the insertion the movable attachment point which is usually farther from the center.

b. When a muscle contracts, the insertion moves towards the origin and produces a movement at the joint. The length of the muscle belly depends on where it inserts and hugely influences body aesthetics, and muscle shape.




BICEPS AESTHETICS
2. PEAK VS LENGTH :-
iu


a. A higher muscle belly means more more dramatic peak but less overall mass potential

b. A lower muscle belly means more overall mass potential but less peak.

c. Ideal muscle insertion is low insertion with a long muscle belly extending closer to the elbow. This is ideal because it results in a fuller bicep appearance. But people with higher insertions can get that mountain look even if the bicep isn't that huge.

d. Can you guess Arnold's muscle insertions ? His are truly insane biceps



CALVES
3. CALF GENETICS :-
iu


a. High insertion calves are long and thin and harder to grow. Long thin muscles are harder to fill and this would be the most genetically determined thing in bodybuilding. There are few ways to outcompete a true calves monster like Mike Matarazzo shown in the above picture.

b. Ideal insertions are low insertions which provide a fuller calf appearance and is more responsive to trainig. These result in thick and full calves which are ideal for aesthetics.


LATS
4. WIDTH AND THE V-TAPER :-
proxy-image


a. Low lat insertions create the V-taper Super Man look that looks ideal from both the front and back poses. It is ideal to have and is the source of the "anime back" memes that showcase gargantuan backs.

b.Higher insertions result in lats that flare out later and dont result in the cape look that is dramatic from both the front and back poses.

c. The man posted here is Serge Nubret. He has an ideal V-taper due to his size and ideal positioning of the lats. This muscle is extremely important to have to give the illusion of size even if you are not a mass monster. This is the make or break for aesthetics since it influences both the front and the back.



ABS
5. SYMMETRY AND DEPTH
proxy-image


a. Here insertion points and shape are more important than the size potential. Muscle segmentation is also crucial to achieve symmetry.

b. Shape and Symmetry are king and define the look. But like calves they are genetic. You will have to work around them if you dont have it.

c. Ideal insertions are even and symmetric insertions that contribute to an aesthetically pleasing look and are well defined. The given example is not a bodybuilder this time but his abs are still aesthetic. His name is Lazar Angelov




CHEST
6. PECTORAL MUSCLES :-
iu


a. This is another one of your make or break in terms of aesthetics in my humble opinion. If you have ideal chest insertions then with training you can build a stunner upper body, combined with lats. The ideal lats and chest combo can give size and the look if trained well. It is the ticket to looking like a Golden Era Classical contender.

b. Ideal insertions are symmetric without a gap between the pecs. This gap is mostly due to high insertions (I have it) that create the pec gap. Mike Tyson also has that gap so check him out if you would like to see some examples

c. Lower insertions produce a fuller chest and looks better with poses and in clothes. With the right size you can also fill out your shirts and T-shirts to look like that villian in the Spider Man comics (forgot his name). Arnold had perhaps the best chest genetics in his time unrivalled by all his contemporaries.

TRICEPS
7. THE HORSESHOE :-
iu


a. The triceps like all other muscles are ideal when inserted low.

b. A low insertion allows for an overall fuller tricep. This enhances the arm's mass and comlements the bicep to make your arms look ginormous

c. The man in this photo Mark Ruhl is a mass monster but still he has the perfect example of what I mean when I say a "horseshoe" tricep. His tricep is so huge it actually gives shape and size to his arm contributing to a comic book look.




DELTS
8. ROUND DELTS :-
iu


a. Yeah, I know I tagged a roider once again, but take a look at his delts. What stands out from the other delts that you see around your average gym mass monster ? The shape and the definition

b. Delts have 3 heads - anterior, posterior and the lateral. The ideal insertion here yet again is a low muscle belly with a high point near the clavicle and scalpula and long muscle bellies down the arm bone.

c. This results in a round 3-D shoulders. A wide upper body from both the front and back. Also there should be a clear separation between the delts, arm and and chest especially when you are lean. This is automatics with leanness and good size




CAN YOU TRAIN AROUND BAD GENETICS ?

a. You cannot change your genetics with training so if you have poor genetics in any one of these you will have to get over it. Honestly, it's not even that of a big deal since a lot of well regarded bodybuilders didnt have top tier genetics in all areas yet still created aesthetic pysiques (Classical only not Open).

b. There are plenty of great guides in Best of The Best section for building size and mass. A good thumb of rule is that a bad muscle looks better when big than when small (common sense) so you can still train and have them thick, full and conditioned. Focus on dense-under-tension training and you will build mass with time.

c. You should put an emphasis on complementary muscles. For e.g. Small calves should be complemented with built hamstrings and quads to make your leg look fuller. Short lats should be complemented with built rear delts, teres major and upper back thickness to give an illusion of a wider back


d. Muscles with high insertions need more volume and frequency to catch up aesthetically. So your priority should be to train lagging body parts atleast 2x times a week using different rep ranges than normal
NOTE - YOU DON'T NEED TO BE A MASS MONSTER TO ACHIEVE AN IDEAL PHYSIQUE. WHILE THE EXAMPLES POSTED HERE ARE VERY LIKELY ON STEROIDS, YOU CAN STILL CREATE AN AESTHETIC PHYSIQUE NATURALLY IF YOU HAVE THE RIGHT TRAINING REGIMEN AND THE GENETICS.


@whitebitchslayer @Aviddegree40571 @Gonthar @superpsycho

Bumb
 
  • +1
  • Love it
Reactions: Underdog9494, R1PPer, sigmamogger and 2 others
  • +1
  • Love it
Reactions: Underdog9494, R1PPer, Aviddegree40571 and 4 others
Why thank you sir for repping me
 
  • +1
Reactions: Underdog9494, R1PPer, Aviddegree40571 and 3 others
INTRODUCTION
1. WHAT ARE MUSCLE INSERTIONS :-
iu


a. In anatomy, every skeletal muscle has two main attachment points -- The origin which is fixed or less movable and closer to the center of the body. The secon main attachment point is the insertion the movable attachment point which is usually farther from the center.

b. When a muscle contracts, the insertion moves towards the origin and produces a movement at the joint. The length of the muscle belly depends on where it inserts and hugely influences body aesthetics, and muscle shape.




BICEPS AESTHETICS
2. PEAK VS LENGTH :-
iu


a. A higher muscle belly means more more dramatic peak but less overall mass potential

b. A lower muscle belly means more overall mass potential but less peak.

c. Ideal muscle insertion is low insertion with a long muscle belly extending closer to the elbow. This is ideal because it results in a fuller bicep appearance. But people with higher insertions can get that mountain look even if the bicep isn't that huge.

d. Can you guess Arnold's muscle insertions ? His are truly insane biceps



CALVES
3. CALF GENETICS :-
iu


a. High insertion calves are long and thin and harder to grow. Long thin muscles are harder to fill and this would be the most genetically determined thing in bodybuilding. There are few ways to outcompete a true calves monster like Mike Matarazzo shown in the above picture.

b. Ideal insertions are low insertions which provide a fuller calf appearance and is more responsive to trainig. These result in thick and full calves which are ideal for aesthetics.


LATS
4. WIDTH AND THE V-TAPER :-
proxy-image


a. Low lat insertions create the V-taper Super Man look that looks ideal from both the front and back poses. It is ideal to have and is the source of the "anime back" memes that showcase gargantuan backs.

b.Higher insertions result in lats that flare out later and dont result in the cape look that is dramatic from both the front and back poses.

c. The man posted here is Serge Nubret. He has an ideal V-taper due to his size and ideal positioning of the lats. This muscle is extremely important to have to give the illusion of size even if you are not a mass monster. This is the make or break for aesthetics since it influences both the front and the back.



ABS
5. SYMMETRY AND DEPTH
proxy-image


a. Here insertion points and shape are more important than the size potential. Muscle segmentation is also crucial to achieve symmetry.

b. Shape and Symmetry are king and define the look. But like calves they are genetic. You will have to work around them if you dont have it.

c. Ideal insertions are even and symmetric insertions that contribute to an aesthetically pleasing look and are well defined. The given example is not a bodybuilder this time but his abs are still aesthetic. His name is Lazar Angelov




CHEST
6. PECTORAL MUSCLES :-
iu


a. This is another one of your make or break in terms of aesthetics in my humble opinion. If you have ideal chest insertions then with training you can build a stunner upper body, combined with lats. The ideal lats and chest combo can give size and the look if trained well. It is the ticket to looking like a Golden Era Classical contender.

b. Ideal insertions are symmetric without a gap between the pecs. This gap is mostly due to high insertions (I have it) that create the pec gap. Mike Tyson also has that gap so check him out if you would like to see some examples

c. Lower insertions produce a fuller chest and looks better with poses and in clothes. With the right size you can also fill out your shirts and T-shirts to look like that villian in the Spider Man comics (forgot his name). Arnold had perhaps the best chest genetics in his time unrivalled by all his contemporaries.

TRICEPS
7. THE HORSESHOE :-
iu


a. The triceps like all other muscles are ideal when inserted low.

b. A low insertion allows for an overall fuller tricep. This enhances the arm's mass and comlements the bicep to make your arms look ginormous

c. The man in this photo Mark Ruhl is a mass monster but still he has the perfect example of what I mean when I say a "horseshoe" tricep. His tricep is so huge it actually gives shape and size to his arm contributing to a comic book look.




DELTS
8. ROUND DELTS :-
iu


a. Yeah, I know I tagged a roider once again, but take a look at his delts. What stands out from the other delts that you see around your average gym mass monster ? The shape and the definition

b. Delts have 3 heads - anterior, posterior and the lateral. The ideal insertion here yet again is a low muscle belly with a high point near the clavicle and scalpula and long muscle bellies down the arm bone.

c. This results in a round 3-D shoulders. A wide upper body from both the front and back. Also there should be a clear separation between the delts, arm and and chest especially when you are lean. This is automatics with leanness and good size




CAN YOU TRAIN AROUND BAD GENETICS ?

a. You cannot change your genetics with training so if you have poor genetics in any one of these you will have to get over it. Honestly, it's not even that of a big deal since a lot of well regarded bodybuilders didnt have top tier genetics in all areas yet still created aesthetic pysiques (Classical only not Open).

b. There are plenty of great guides in Best of The Best section for building size and mass. A good thumb of rule is that a bad muscle looks better when big than when small (common sense) so you can still train and have them thick, full and conditioned. Focus on dense-under-tension training and you will build mass with time.

c. You should put an emphasis on complementary muscles. For e.g. Small calves should be complemented with built hamstrings and quads to make your leg look fuller. Short lats should be complemented with built rear delts, teres major and upper back thickness to give an illusion of a wider back


d. Muscles with high insertions need more volume and frequency to catch up aesthetically. So your priority should be to train lagging body parts atleast 2x times a week using different rep ranges than normal
NOTE - YOU DON'T NEED TO BE A MASS MONSTER TO ACHIEVE AN IDEAL PHYSIQUE. WHILE THE EXAMPLES POSTED HERE ARE VERY LIKELY ON STEROIDS, YOU CAN STILL CREATE AN AESTHETIC PHYSIQUE NATURALLY IF YOU HAVE THE RIGHT TRAINING REGIMEN AND THE GENETICS.


@whitebitchslayer @Aviddegree40571 @Gonthar @superpsycho

I have good insertions but not a good face. Gotta love god for this one man
 
  • +1
  • Love it
Reactions: Underdog9494, R1PPer, superpsycho and 4 others
I have good insertions but not a good face. Gotta love god for this one man
If you like it I will surely tag you in future serious post. Have a good day !
 
  • +1
Reactions: Underdog9494, R1PPer, Aviddegree40571 and 2 others
Nice thread, real shame that insertions are genetic.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Underdog9494, R1PPer, talcel and 1 other person
INTRODUCTION
1. WHAT ARE MUSCLE INSERTIONS :-
iu


a. In anatomy, every skeletal muscle has two main attachment points -- The origin which is fixed or less movable and closer to the center of the body. The secon main attachment point is the insertion the movable attachment point which is usually farther from the center.

b. When a muscle contracts, the insertion moves towards the origin and produces a movement at the joint. The length of the muscle belly depends on where it inserts and hugely influences body aesthetics, and muscle shape.




BICEPS AESTHETICS
2. PEAK VS LENGTH :-
iu


a. A higher muscle belly means more more dramatic peak but less overall mass potential

b. A lower muscle belly means more overall mass potential but less peak.

c. Ideal muscle insertion is low insertion with a long muscle belly extending closer to the elbow. This is ideal because it results in a fuller bicep appearance. But people with higher insertions can get that mountain look even if the bicep isn't that huge.

d. Can you guess Arnold's muscle insertions ? His are truly insane biceps



CALVES
3. CALF GENETICS :-
iu


a. High insertion calves are long and thin and harder to grow. Long thin muscles are harder to fill and this would be the most genetically determined thing in bodybuilding. There are few ways to outcompete a true calves monster like Mike Matarazzo shown in the above picture.

b. Ideal insertions are low insertions which provide a fuller calf appearance and is more responsive to trainig. These result in thick and full calves which are ideal for aesthetics.


LATS
4. WIDTH AND THE V-TAPER :-
proxy-image


a. Low lat insertions create the V-taper Super Man look that looks ideal from both the front and back poses. It is ideal to have and is the source of the "anime back" memes that showcase gargantuan backs.

b.Higher insertions result in lats that flare out later and dont result in the cape look that is dramatic from both the front and back poses.

c. The man posted here is Serge Nubret. He has an ideal V-taper due to his size and ideal positioning of the lats. This muscle is extremely important to have to give the illusion of size even if you are not a mass monster. This is the make or break for aesthetics since it influences both the front and the back.



ABS
5. SYMMETRY AND DEPTH
proxy-image


a. Here insertion points and shape are more important than the size potential. Muscle segmentation is also crucial to achieve symmetry.

b. Shape and Symmetry are king and define the look. But like calves they are genetic. You will have to work around them if you dont have it.

c. Ideal insertions are even and symmetric insertions that contribute to an aesthetically pleasing look and are well defined. The given example is not a bodybuilder this time but his abs are still aesthetic. His name is Lazar Angelov




CHEST
6. PECTORAL MUSCLES :-
iu


a. This is another one of your make or break in terms of aesthetics in my humble opinion. If you have ideal chest insertions then with training you can build a stunner upper body, combined with lats. The ideal lats and chest combo can give size and the look if trained well. It is the ticket to looking like a Golden Era Classical contender.

b. Ideal insertions are symmetric without a gap between the pecs. This gap is mostly due to high insertions (I have it) that create the pec gap. Mike Tyson also has that gap so check him out if you would like to see some examples

c. Lower insertions produce a fuller chest and looks better with poses and in clothes. With the right size you can also fill out your shirts and T-shirts to look like that villian in the Spider Man comics (forgot his name). Arnold had perhaps the best chest genetics in his time unrivalled by all his contemporaries.

TRICEPS
7. THE HORSESHOE :-
iu


a. The triceps like all other muscles are ideal when inserted low.

b. A low insertion allows for an overall fuller tricep. This enhances the arm's mass and comlements the bicep to make your arms look ginormous

c. The man in this photo Mark Ruhl is a mass monster but still he has the perfect example of what I mean when I say a "horseshoe" tricep. His tricep is so huge it actually gives shape and size to his arm contributing to a comic book look.




DELTS
8. ROUND DELTS :-
iu


a. Yeah, I know I tagged a roider once again, but take a look at his delts. What stands out from the other delts that you see around your average gym mass monster ? The shape and the definition

b. Delts have 3 heads - anterior, posterior and the lateral. The ideal insertion here yet again is a low muscle belly with a high point near the clavicle and scalpula and long muscle bellies down the arm bone.

c. This results in a round 3-D shoulders. A wide upper body from both the front and back. Also there should be a clear separation between the delts, arm and and chest especially when you are lean. This is automatics with leanness and good size




CAN YOU TRAIN AROUND BAD GENETICS ?

a. You cannot change your genetics with training so if you have poor genetics in any one of these you will have to get over it. Honestly, it's not even that of a big deal since a lot of well regarded bodybuilders didnt have top tier genetics in all areas yet still created aesthetic pysiques (Classical only not Open).

b. There are plenty of great guides in Best of The Best section for building size and mass. A good thumb of rule is that a bad muscle looks better when big than when small (common sense) so you can still train and have them thick, full and conditioned. Focus on dense-under-tension training and you will build mass with time.

c. You should put an emphasis on complementary muscles. For e.g. Small calves should be complemented with built hamstrings and quads to make your leg look fuller. Short lats should be complemented with built rear delts, teres major and upper back thickness to give an illusion of a wider back


d. Muscles with high insertions need more volume and frequency to catch up aesthetically. So your priority should be to train lagging body parts atleast 2x times a week using different rep ranges than normal
NOTE - YOU DON'T NEED TO BE A MASS MONSTER TO ACHIEVE AN IDEAL PHYSIQUE. WHILE THE EXAMPLES POSTED HERE ARE VERY LIKELY ON STEROIDS, YOU CAN STILL CREATE AN AESTHETIC PHYSIQUE NATURALLY IF YOU HAVE THE RIGHT TRAINING REGIMEN AND THE GENETICS.


@whitebitchslayer @Aviddegree40571 @Gonthar @superpsycho

Here B4 BOTB :p

Today is Sunday, 6th of April, 2025.

The weather is: Mostly cloudy πŸŒ₯️
The temperature is: 9️⃣ degrees🌑️
Slight chance of rainfall later on🌧️

Spread love🌈 Not hateπŸ‘Ή
 
  • JFL
  • +1
  • Love it
Reactions: Underdog9494, R1PPer, itzyaboyJJ and 1 other person
Nice thread, real shame that insertions are genetic.
I actually wanted to include bone structure too. But then the guide would be more convoluted. I wanted to keep it simple based on what I know
 
  • +1
Reactions: Underdog9494, R1PPer, Aviddegree40571 and 1 other person
Here B4 BOTB :p

Today is Sunday, 6th of April, 2025.

The weather is: Mostly cloudy πŸŒ₯️
The temperature is: 9️⃣ degrees🌑️
Slight chance of rainfall later on🌧️


Spread love🌈 Not hateπŸ‘Ή
Spread bait sir BAIT !!
 
  • +1
Reactions: Underdog9494, R1PPer, Aviddegree40571 and 2 others
@R1PPer @Underdog9494
 
  • +1
Reactions: Underdog9494, R1PPer and itzyaboyJJ
  • +1
Reactions: Underdog9494, R1PPer and loyolaxavvierretard
Also genetic but can be altered with the use of drugs, testosterone growth hormone all that shi.
I wouldnt suggest those things to be honest. Who knows some bluepiller kid reads it and then is permanently relyng on TRT
 
  • +1
Reactions: Underdog9494, R1PPer, Aviddegree40571 and 1 other person
Also genetic but can be altered with the use of drugs, testosterone growth hormone all that shi.
Pretty sure there some people who inject HA to fraud better insertions, or it’s synthenol or sum I don’t remember.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Underdog9494 and R1PPer
I wouldnt suggest those things to be honest. Who knows some bluepiller kid reads it and then is permanently relyng on TRT
If I had money for those drugs I’d get them, but I’m broke so I can’t constantly buy trt all the time .
 
  • +1
Reactions: Underdog9494, R1PPer and loyolaxavvierretard
Thanks man I appreciate it. You’re a swell chap :feelsgood:
I like it when even one person reads it and likes it. Only tagging interested people. I dont want to force anyone to read what I write
 
  • +1
Reactions: Underdog9494, R1PPer, davidlaidisme67 and 1 other person
If I had money for those drugs I’d get them, but I’m broke so I can’t constantly buy trt all the time .
Yeah, there are actually so many posts on drugs that if I were to sit down and make it, it would surely not be worth the time. You can just read them after searching. Also a cycle is very costly so the people who do it are most likely upper middle class. For us brokies we have to make do with being natty
 
  • +1
Reactions: Underdog9494, R1PPer and itzyaboyJJ
@thereallegend
 
  • +1
Reactions: Underdog9494, R1PPer and itzyaboyJJ
bmp
 
  • +1
Reactions: Underdog9494, R1PPer and itzyaboyJJ
Yeah, there are actually so many posts on drugs that if I were to sit down and make it, it would surely not be worth the time. You can just read them after searching. Also a cycle is very costly so the people who do it are most likely upper middle class. For us brokies we have to make do with being natty
Just spam buy shoulder pads from china to maintain chad tier frame all the time, cause drugs are for rich fags nglngl.
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Underdog9494, R1PPer and loyolaxavvierretard
Just spam buy shoulder pads from china to maintain chad tier frame all the time, cause drugs are for rich fags nglngl.
Homelander maxxing
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: The Homelander, Underdog9494, R1PPer and 1 other person
  • +1
  • Love it
  • JFL
Reactions: The Homelander, Underdog9494, R1PPer and 1 other person
Bmp
 
  • +1
Reactions: The Homelander, Underdog9494, R1PPer and 1 other person
@tuberculosisinmybal @Bitchwhipper2
 
  • +1
Reactions: The Homelander, Underdog9494, R1PPer and 2 others
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: The Homelander, Underdog9494, R1PPer and 1 other person
bmp
 
  • +1
Reactions: The Homelander, Underdog9494, ss07 and 1 other person
Fuark a mod repped this post. Thank you very much sir. I will surely make another guide like this
 
  • +1
Reactions: The Homelander, Underdog9494, ss07 and 1 other person
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: The Homelander, Underdog9494, R1PPer and 1 other person
  • +1
Reactions: The Homelander, Underdog9494 and R1PPer
Here B4 BOTB :p

Today is Sunday, 6th of April, 2025.

The weather is: Mostly cloudy πŸŒ₯️
The temperature is: 9️⃣ degrees🌑️
Slight chance of rainfall later on🌧️


Spread love🌈 Not hateπŸ‘Ή
You gay bro?:feelswhat:
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Underdog9494 and loyolaxavvierretard
  • +1
Reactions: Underdog9494 and R1PPer
Abs and chest are the most important incerts imo… asymmetrical abs with low count (like only having 4) looks horrible compared to symmetry plus having 6 or 8 also flat chest is brutal. Biceps can look good either way and no one gives a fuck about calves
 
  • +1
Reactions: loyolaxavvierretard
Abs and chest are the most important incerts imo… asymmetrical abs with low count (like only having 4) looks horrible compared to symmetry plus having 6 or 8 also flat chest is brutal. Biceps can look good either way and no one gives a fuck about calves
ABs are good but from the viewpoint of size lat makes a huge difference. After a point, you will not grow that much in size so having good genetics is crucial. Abs are also important but unlike Lats and Chest you can get away with quite a bit in terms of aesthetics. I routinely see a lot of Silver Era bodybuilders who had noticeable asymmetry but still set the standards for a modern day jacked physique (natty). For lats too you can have a bit of flaws but the size illusion it gives you is absolutely mid boggling especially from both front and back. Abs are not really going to do it in the back. From the front though they are very important and can elevate your physique. If you want a great example of tge Superman cape type look that lats give you you can look at peak Arnold in competitions. He looked regal. I apologise, this comment has already become too long
 
  • +1
Reactions: whitebitchslayer
Bumping this to the moon
 
  • JFL
Reactions: loyolaxavvierretard

Similar threads

Romxnus753AC
Replies
12
Views
178
Bewusst
Bewusst
rrm_ss2
Replies
5
Views
232
rrm_ss2
rrm_ss2
got.daim
Replies
16
Views
123
Neucher
Neucher
jfllllllllmao
Replies
9
Views
474
TrooKvlt
TrooKvlt
got.daim
Replies
14
Views
385
Aladin
Aladin

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top