Muscles dont mean shit in a fight..

[batman1997]

There is always that stereotype that a muscular dude could beat anyone jfl a skinny is likely stronger and could beat up a muscular dude muscles doesnt always mean your actually stronger you just appear to be.

 

[batman1997]

Bump

 

[Magnus Ironblood]

Just 'cause I'm the skinny sort, they think they can fuck with me
It's the principle, my heart's cold like wintersports
Skinny nigga, so I swing with tools

 

[recai iskender]

Water

 

[batman1997]

Water

Not water your just brainwashed that roided faggots are strong cause they have muscles.

 

[recai iskender]

Not water your just brainwashed that roided faggots are strong cause hey have muscles.

Are you fucking retarded i agree that muscles dont mean shit in a fight

 

[TrueSlavic]

yeah like the sky is blue ahh statement, what do you expect? no ones gonna deny this

 

[Hernan]

strength of muscle is directly correlated to muscle mass so your cope of

a skinny is likely stronger and could beat up a muscular dude

is low iq garbage.

 

[batman1997]

strength of muscle is directly correlated to muscle mass so your cope of

is low iq garbage.

Even chadGPT says It..
Not necessarily. While more muscle mass often correlates with greater strength, it's not the only factor that determines how strong someone is. Here’s a breakdown:


---

What can more muscle mass mean?

Potential for strength: More muscle usually means more muscle fibers available to contract, which gives a higher potential for generating force.

Training adaptation: If someone has more muscle from strength training, they’ve probably also trained their nervous system, making their muscles more efficient.



---

Why muscle mass ≠ guaranteed strength:

Neuromuscular efficiency: Someone with less muscle mass might still be stronger if their nervous system is better at recruiting muscle fibers. Think of Olympic lifters—they might look lean but lift insane weights.

Muscle quality vs. size: Bigger muscles don’t always mean better-performing muscles. Bodybuilders often train for size (hypertrophy), not for strength or explosiveness.

Technique and experience: Strength depends heavily on how well someone can perform a lift. Good form and technique can beat brute muscle mass.

Leverage and body mechanics: Limb length, joint angles, and tendon insertions all affect how strong someone is in practical terms.



---

Example:

A lean powerlifter may deadlift more than a huge bodybuilder, despite having less visible muscle, simply because their training is focused on pure strength and technique.



---

So, more muscle gives you potential for more strength—but st
rength is about more than just size.

 

[Hernan]

Even chadGPT says It..

"EvEn cHaDGpT sAyS iT." who cares it still didnt agree.

Not necessarily. While more muscle mass often correlates with greater strength, it's not the only factor that determines how strong someone is. Here’s a breakdown:


---

What can more muscle mass mean?

Potential for strength: More muscle usually means more muscle fibers available to contract, which gives a higher potential for generating force.

Training adaptation: If someone has more muscle from strength training, they’ve probably also trained their nervous system, making their muscles more efficient.

dnr its the main factor.

---

Why muscle mass ≠ guaranteed strength:

Neuromuscular efficiency: Someone with less muscle mass might still be stronger if their nervous system is better at recruiting muscle fibers. Think of Olympic lifters—they might look lean but lift insane weights.

they still got obvious mass.

Muscle quality vs. size: Bigger muscles don’t always mean better-performing muscles. Bodybuilders often train for size (hypertrophy), not for strength or explosiveness.

but they do most of the time.

Technique and experience: Strength depends heavily on how well someone can perform a lift. Good form and technique can beat brute muscle mass.

Leverage and body mechanics: Limb length, joint angles, and tendon insertions all affect how strong someone is in practical terms.

"form and technique can beat brute muscle mass." technique cant do shit without muscle.

---

Example:

A lean powerlifter may deadlift more than a huge bodybuilder, despite having less visible muscle, simply because their training is focused on pure strength and technique.

there's an obvious line ofcourse.

---

So, more muscle gives you potential for more strength—but st
rength is about more than just size.

though 90% is, even a fat guy can be strong af without too much muscle because of the weight he can put behind his movement.
@org3cel.RR opinion? i think this is retarded asfuck but maybe you prove me wrong.

 

[looksmaxxed]

muscles=force generation, protective padding. a muscular guy who can fight will beat the skinny guy who can fight. also in process of becoing good at fghting, you gain muscle.

the idea that you can be a twink and win in most engagements is delusion of grandeur thinking

an out of shape fat guy with power can just grab and sit on you and break your spine.

most skinny guys get beaten to death in 99% of engagements.

 

[Panzram]

There is always that stereotype that a muscular dude could beat anyone jfl a skinny is likely stronger and could beat up a muscular dude muscles doesnt always mean your actually stronger you just appear to be.

The bigger the muscle the stronger it is. Strength is directly correlated with muscle cross section area.

Also the heavier the man the harder he is to move or knockout, the more weight he puts into his punches. Even just having some extra fat makes you a harder puncher due to the extra mass you can throw into a punch, let alone extra muscle.

How can anyone cope this hard? This is one of the most unversaly known things in nature: that big is strong and dangerous. All animals try and make themselves look bigger when they wanna intimidate, and guess what - it often works. Kids also know this instinctively, so do copers, they just cope as hard as they can but when the push comes to shove they respect the size.

P.S I am a small guy myself and would like to believe it means nothing in a fight, but it does.

 

[batman1997]

The bigger the muscle the stronger it is. Strength is dorectly correlated with muscle cross section area.

Also the heavier the man the harder he is to move or knockout, the more weight he puts into his punches. Even just having some extra fat makes you a harder puncher due to the extra mass you can throw into a punch, let alone extra muscle.

How can anyone cope this hard? This is one of the most unversaly known things in nature: that big is strong and dangerous. All animals try and make themselves look bigger when they wanna intimidate, and guess what - it often works. Kids also know this instinctively, so do copers, they just cope as hard as they can but when the push comes to shove they respect the size.

P.S I am a small guy myself and would like to believe it means nothing in a fight, but it does.

Explain why theres many boxers in my country Who are atleast 5'9 average height average sized men go Up against 6'1 tall men with way more muscle mass and beat the shit out of them.

 

[looksmaxxed]

Explain why theres many boxers in my country Who are atleast 5'9 average height average sized men go Up against 6'1 tall men with way more muscle mass and beat the shit out of them.

what are the actual statistics? in most combat sports, the pattern favors the larger stronger guy.

exhibition matches between professionals vs untrained gymcels don't matter. it's just ego stroking for the manlet boxers

 

[Panzram]

Explain why theres many boxers in my country Who are atleast 5'9 average height average sized men go Up against 6'1 tall men with way more muscle mass and beat the shit out of them

After you explain why do all fightes nearly kill themselves to cut massive amounts of weight? Because at that level where everyone is at max skill, even 10 lbs weight advantage makes a massive difference. The difference between lightweight UFC division and fethaerweight is 10 lbs. Boxing has even smaller jumps. Size and strength are still the most important things to have in a fight, always were, always will be. Bigger guys will always hit harder on average and be able to absorb more damage on average. Outliers mean shit. Also there has not been a single skinny lightweight man in the entire history of combat sports that could defeat pro heavyweights. Why dont we see a 180 lbs 5'9 guy in the heavyweight divison ever?

inb4 a trained mma fighter can beat an untrained counch potato that outweighs him by 60 lbs. Sure he can, but that is comparing apples and oranges.

 

[org3cel.RR]

"EvEn cHaDGpT sAyS iT." who cares it still didnt agree.

dnr its the main factor.

they still got obvious mass.

but they do most of the time.

"form and technique can beat brute muscle mass." technique cant do shit without muscle.

there's an obvious line ofcourse.

though 90% is, even a fat guy can be strong af without too much muscle because of the weight he can put behind his movement.
@org3cel.RR opinion? i think this is retarded asfuck but maybe you prove me wrong.

People misunderstand the concept in muscles, if a skinny ufc guy threw a punch, and a bodybuilder did the same
Both knew how to throw a basic punch, guess what the guy with the more muscle mass will apply more force, besides in those fights with bodybuilders they cant even breaty properly or move their bodys, and they always end up in a choke hold never beaten to the ground.
Muscle and technice matters.