my base gym stats *untrained* - updating in a year (gymcels gtfih and tell me if its good)

S

schizowillascend

to be seen
Joined
Oct 31, 2024
Posts
6,936
Reputation
7,995
age: 16.5

height: 5'7.5
weight: 57kg

bodyfat%: 14/15
FFMI: 17.5

bidelt: 18.25 inches

shoulders: 112.5cm
waist: 68cm

arms (flexed): 12 inches
calves (flexed): 13 inches

wrist: 6.75 inches

lmk if i am missing anything
 
Cracking Up Lol GIF by reactionseditor
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: sub5anomaly, SilverStCloud, HerpDerpson and 2 others
Mogs me
 
  • +1
Reactions: schizowillascend
yeah those are pretty good base stats. you're SWR is like 1.65 if you measured correctly which is above average. bidelt is also above average for your height. so i can tell the frame is good but the overall mass is lacking, particularly in the arms. ideally for an aesthetic physique the measurements between the calves, arms, and neck should all be the same. steeve reeves, silver era bodybuilder, advocated for this, 18 inch neck, 18 inch arms, and 18 inch calves, or simply have it proportioned but smaller.

get your arms and calves both to 14 inches, that'll look a lot better i imagine. and just work on building the shoulders to bring up your SWR even more. 1.8+ SWR is ideal tbh, 1.618 is just vitruvian man bullshit. and i'd say work on a very lean bulk, only 200+ calories above maintenance, i did this for about 3 years and gained 35 lbs of lean tissue while staying relatively low bodyfat.
 
  • +1
Reactions: schizowillascend
yeah those are pretty good base stats. you're SWR is like 1.65 if you measured correctly which is above average. bidelt is also above average for your height. so i can tell the frame is good but the overall mass is lacking, particularly in the arms. ideally for an aesthetic physique the measurements between the calves, arms, and neck should all be the same. steeve reeves, silver era bodybuilder, advocated for this, 18 inch neck, 18 inch arms, and 18 inch calves, or simply have it proportioned but smaller.

get your arms and calves both to 14 inches, that'll look a lot better i imagine. and just work on building the shoulders to bring up your SWR even more. 1.8+ SWR is ideal tbh, 1.618 is just vitruvian man bullshit. and i'd say work on a very lean bulk, only 200+ calories above maintenance, i did this for about 3 years and gained 35 lbs of lean tissue while staying relatively low bodyfat.
what would you guess my physique rating is rn (including my height)

and what might be achievalbe in say, a year
 
  • +1
Reactions: HundredManSlayer
what would you guess my physique rating is rn (including my height)

and what might be achievalbe in say, a year
i'll use steve reeves as a reference point for this, lets say he's the peak 10/10 physique. it's hard to realistically say but between 4.5 - 5.

12-20 lbs of muscle growth is a realistic amount in one year for naturals starting out. i gained about 18 lbs of muscle my first year of training.
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: midfacedeficient and schizowillascend
i'll use steve reeves as a reference point for this, lets say he's the peak 10/10 physique. it's hard to realistically say but between 4.5 - 5.

12-20 lbs of muscle growth is a realistic amount in one year for naturals starting out. i gained about 18 lbs of muscle my first year of training.
aight and would that take me to like 6 overall?
 
  • +1
Reactions: HundredManSlayer
age: 16.5

height: 5'7.5
weight: 57kg

bodyfat%: 14/15
FFMI: 17.5

bidelt: 18.25 inches

shoulders: 112.5cm
waist: 68cm

arms (flexed): 12 inches
calves (flexed): 13 inches

wrist: 6.75 inches

lmk if i am missing anything
Eat steak and eggs and lift weights. Good base but zero muscle
 
  • +1
Reactions: schizowillascend
aight and would that take me to like 6 overall?
i'd say thats a good estimate. you're mostly just lacking in the overall mass department.
 
  • +1
Reactions: schizowillascend
i'd say thats a good estimate. you're mostly just lacking in the overall mass department.
idk why that happened, i wonder if i'd be taller if i was avg in mass
 
  • +1
Reactions: HundredManSlayer
idk why that happened, i wonder if i'd be taller if i was avg in mass
probably not but wouldn't worry too much, you can fraud to like 5'10 with lifts. you height mog me so
 
  • +1
Reactions: schizowillascend
probably not but wouldn't worry too much, you can fraud to like 5'10 with lifts. you height mog me so
If I had avg proportions I assume my physique would be suv4
 
  • +1
Reactions: HundredManSlayer
If I had avg proportions I assume my physique would be suv4
proportions pill is brutal, look at jeff nippard vs jeff seid it's comical the difference. i've seen other posts of yours and your proportions are longer and lankier which is ideal for looking aesthetic, short extremetries look like dog shit
 
  • +1
Reactions: schizowillascend
proportions pill is brutal, look at jeff nippard vs jeff seid it's comical the difference. i've seen other posts of yours and your proportions are longer and lankier which is ideal for looking aesthetic, short extremetries look like dog shit
idek how my musclemass is below avg,i am physically active at school, eat a normal amount and have high test
 
  • +1
Reactions: HundredManSlayer
master dips. makes your chest big and women love to caress your chest after sex
 
  • JFL
Reactions: schizowillascend
idek how my musclemass is below avg,i am physically active at school, eat a normal amount and have high test
its probably not below average, it just is below average in the fitness and bodybuilding world. pretty much everyone has skewed ideas of what the perfect physique is.
 
  • +1
Reactions: schizowillascend
its probably not below average, it just is below average in the fitness and bodybuilding world. pretty much everyone has skewed ideas of what the perfect physique is.
true, i am just in it to be appealing to women ngl LMAO
 
  • +1
Reactions: HundredManSlayer

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top