Changmentum
The Next Chang
- Joined
- Dec 17, 2024
- Posts
- 1,364
- Reputation
- 2,437
What the BP gets right:
- The oofy doofy theory describes an observable phenomenon we see throughout society, in which less attractive males are able to get into relationships through the financial security, and emotional support they provide to the women.
- Your looks play a crucial rule in your social development. The better looking you are (tall, broader shoulders, chiseled jaw), the better you’ll be treated by your peers.
- White people are the most attractive race, everything being equal. That’s why White women and White males are the group with the most broad appeal.
- Humans are not inherently monogamous creatures. While we may genuinely love our spouses and wives, we’ll still have some level of attraction towards other human beings. That’s why you sometimes see girls in relationships, reposting videos about tall Chad.
What the BP gets wrong:
- Socioeconomic status can yield genuine physical attraction. By society portraying you as some powerful important figure, you can alter women’s psyche into being more physically attracted to you, albeit it doesn’t always work. The point is that genuine physical attraction can arise from wealth and socioeconomic status, the extent to which this phenomenon exists though is highly debatable.
- People mostly marry those in the same or similar social classes as them. For example, white trash women will usually marry white trash men. This socioeconomic factor that plays into marriage, can transcend looks.
- Most men are not in oofy doofy relationships. The percentage of men in dead bed room relationships is quite low around 5-10% according to surveys (albeit it’s probably a bit higher), but still doesn’t constitute most relationships. Therefore, it’s still possible and plausible that unattractive males can find women that generally like them.
- While the JBWpill is somewhat correct, most women still prefer men of their own racial group. We’re human beings born with in-group preferences, and most of us are socialized in homogenous racial and cultural communities, so it’s only natural for most women to still date and marry those in their own race group. Asian and Latino women are the least likely to be racially loyal statistically, but most still prefer men of their own racial group.
- There are a lot of relationships in which both parties (the male and the female) have similar looks. For example, I’ve seen a lot of Asian couples in which both parties have a nerdy phenotype. This sorta disproves the notion that people are inherently Chad or Stacysexual, given that both men and women do have types. It empathizes that people tend to be attracted to those that are likeminded, whether that be similar personality, interests, or looks, which can transcend natural hypergamy.
- Neurodivergence is a death sentence when it comes to dating. The slight bit of neurodivergence whether that be even in the form of slight social passiveness, can be detected. These weird behaviors of neurodivergent individuals can decrease their social market value. Not even HTNs can get away with it sometime.
Other thoughts:
- Chad is the male with the most broad appeal. They tend to be taller, White, have broad shoulders, symmetrical face, hinged eyes, chiseled chin, etc. However, this doesn’t guarantee that every woman is gonna find Chad attractive, given that women do have types.
- Facial attractiveness is objectively quantifiable, although easier between the extreme high or low ranges of facial attractiveness.
- The oofy doofy theory describes an observable phenomenon we see throughout society, in which less attractive males are able to get into relationships through the financial security, and emotional support they provide to the women.
- Your looks play a crucial rule in your social development. The better looking you are (tall, broader shoulders, chiseled jaw), the better you’ll be treated by your peers.
- White people are the most attractive race, everything being equal. That’s why White women and White males are the group with the most broad appeal.
- Humans are not inherently monogamous creatures. While we may genuinely love our spouses and wives, we’ll still have some level of attraction towards other human beings. That’s why you sometimes see girls in relationships, reposting videos about tall Chad.
What the BP gets wrong:
- Socioeconomic status can yield genuine physical attraction. By society portraying you as some powerful important figure, you can alter women’s psyche into being more physically attracted to you, albeit it doesn’t always work. The point is that genuine physical attraction can arise from wealth and socioeconomic status, the extent to which this phenomenon exists though is highly debatable.
- People mostly marry those in the same or similar social classes as them. For example, white trash women will usually marry white trash men. This socioeconomic factor that plays into marriage, can transcend looks.
- Most men are not in oofy doofy relationships. The percentage of men in dead bed room relationships is quite low around 5-10% according to surveys (albeit it’s probably a bit higher), but still doesn’t constitute most relationships. Therefore, it’s still possible and plausible that unattractive males can find women that generally like them.
- While the JBWpill is somewhat correct, most women still prefer men of their own racial group. We’re human beings born with in-group preferences, and most of us are socialized in homogenous racial and cultural communities, so it’s only natural for most women to still date and marry those in their own race group. Asian and Latino women are the least likely to be racially loyal statistically, but most still prefer men of their own racial group.
- There are a lot of relationships in which both parties (the male and the female) have similar looks. For example, I’ve seen a lot of Asian couples in which both parties have a nerdy phenotype. This sorta disproves the notion that people are inherently Chad or Stacysexual, given that both men and women do have types. It empathizes that people tend to be attracted to those that are likeminded, whether that be similar personality, interests, or looks, which can transcend natural hypergamy.
- Neurodivergence is a death sentence when it comes to dating. The slight bit of neurodivergence whether that be even in the form of slight social passiveness, can be detected. These weird behaviors of neurodivergent individuals can decrease their social market value. Not even HTNs can get away with it sometime.
Other thoughts:
- Chad is the male with the most broad appeal. They tend to be taller, White, have broad shoulders, symmetrical face, hinged eyes, chiseled chin, etc. However, this doesn’t guarantee that every woman is gonna find Chad attractive, given that women do have types.
- Facial attractiveness is objectively quantifiable, although easier between the extreme high or low ranges of facial attractiveness.
