My facial rating on looksiq

TrueRamirez

TrueRamirez

6'8 in shoes
Joined
Oct 10, 2024
Posts
2,305
Reputation
3,216
Screenshot 20260404 115930
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Jensonsahighlander
Worst name on here?
 
  • +1
Reactions: TrueRamirez
Over
 
  • +1
Reactions: TrueRamirez and Chance
i can't lie that shit is so flawed all of those ratios change depending on how far the picture was taken from and lighting
 
  • +1
Reactions: TrueRamirez
i can't lie that shit is so flawed all of those ratios change depending on how far the picture was taken from and lighting
I took it unfrauded asf
 
Nigga paid for this😂😂😂😂
Its all fake bullshit you know?
 
Explain what you mean by this
Hmmmm soo
Its a made up rating my lil retard vegetable

Let me explain:
‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍
kys pajeeto
 
  • +1
Reactions: TrueRamirez
Hmmmm soo
Its a made up rating my lil retard vegetable

Let me explain:
‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍
kys pajeeto
Others rating you is considered made up?
You have the brain power of a foid
 
I went there and started choosing but holy crap so many subhuman ugly there
 
  • +1
Reactions: TrueRamirez
my bitch slave is back
 
  • +1
Reactions: TrueRamirez
i can't lie that shit is so flawed all of those ratios change depending on how far the picture was taken from and lighting
i can't lie that shit is so flawed all of those ratios change depending on how far the picture was taken from and lighting
True the competition is cooked, which is why I don't feel that bad about mine
Im the creator of looksiq and we have implemented measures to ensure that the norms are accurate. We have integrated pictures from representative Datasets to calculate the actual mean and standard deviation for our sample. I hope that helps ❤️
 
  • +1
Reactions: TrueRamirez
Nigger its fake as fuck anyways JFL
Its not fake but based on the wisdom of the crowd. The idea is rooted in the central limit theorem which states that the sum of independent votes tends towards a normal distribution regardless of the distribution of individual guesses. This means that individual bias (noise) gets cancelled out and you are only stuck with true variance. We use Item response theory to come up with your score. It models the relationship between a latent factor ( in this care attractiveness ) and the probability that a person wins against another person. Another person mentioned that scores fluctuate but that is to be expected when looking at the formula for the confidence interval. You divide the standard deviation by the root of N to calculate the standard error. That means as N (number of votes) increases the score becomes more static and is less likely to change but this takes some time. Our approach has nothing to do with ratios or any of that viciously circular stuff that you are used to seeing. Its a community project supposed to help people find out where they stand.
 
  • +1
Reactions: TrueRamirez
Im the creator of looksiq and we have implemented measures to ensure that the norms are accurate. We have integrated pictures from representative Datasets to calculate the actual mean and standard deviation for our sample. I hope that helps ❤️
Bruh are you larping or what
 
Its not fake but based on the wisdom of the crowd. The idea is rooted in the central limit theorem which states that the sum of independent votes tends towards a normal distribution regardless of the distribution of individual guesses. This means that individual bias (noise) gets cancelled out and you are only stuck with true variance. We use Item response theory to come up with your score. It models the relationship between a latent factor ( in this care attractiveness ) and the probability that a person wins against another person. Another person mentioned that scores fluctuate but that is to be expected when looking at the formula for the confidence interval. You divide the standard deviation by the root of N to calculate the standard error. That means as N (number of votes) increases the score becomes more static and is less likely to change but this takes some time. Our approach has nothing to do with ratios or any of that viciously circular stuff that you are used to seeing. Its a community project supposed to help people find out where they stand.
Screenshot 20260407 012758

This is way too cooked fro me bro I'm average looking
 
  • +1
Reactions: LookzMaxxerSyn and TrueRamirez

Similar threads

SilvioMoltisantiDan
Replies
7
Views
46
SilvioMoltisantiDan
SilvioMoltisantiDan
PharmaPhaggot
Replies
1
Views
66
boxing-cel
boxing-cel
Anabol
Replies
6
Views
66
kisslessvirgin
kisslessvirgin
insignia_
Replies
7
Views
65
Rylie
Rylie

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top