My Scientific Research

[Deleted member 10913]

https://looksmax.org/threads/my-guide-1001-succes-rate.272378/
https://looksmax.org/threads/important-for-looksmaxing.246426/
https://looksmax.org/threads/important-for-looksmaxing.246426/

https://looksmax.org/threads/rate-famous-turkish-actor-cuneyt-arkin.246522/

IT CONTAINS HIDDEN KNOWLEDGES THAT YOU CAN'T FIND ANYWHERE ELSE. LOOK INTO HIT

 

[eduardkoopman]

https://looksmax.org/threads/my-guide-1001-succes-rate.272378/
https://looksmax.org/threads/important-for-looksmaxing.246426/
https://looksmax.org/threads/important-for-looksmaxing.246426/

https://looksmax.org/threads/rate-famous-turkish-actor-cuneyt-arkin.246522/

IT CONTAINS HIDDEN KNOWLEDGES THAT YOU CAN'T FIND ANYWHERE ELSE. LOOK INTO HIT

Mirin the high efforts, in them.
I bookmark to go read them.

How did you come up with "money matters 20%"??

 

[Deleted member 10913]

Mirin the high efforts, in them.
I bookmark to go read them.

How did you come up with "money matters 20%"??

Interasting that you ask, the method i used to make the precentages was i first tried to figure out looks is part of SMV. most anecdotes i read gives 80 of smv to looks. In my opinion this is too high. I used various other numbers in mind of the tinder expirements real life relationships in turkey and the west. and 70% of looks seems in my opinion the rational. Every other number downplays looks or money and status.

There can only be a total of 100% so 30% is what remains for money and status. Money in SMV seems more important then status, because it's more essential in survival en reproducten. Money itself gives you status, the reverse doesn't happen. The two are by this not equel so a 15%/15% is not possible. 20% is precentage that represents money importants fairly good without undermining status.

 

[eduardkoopman]

Interasting that you ask, the method i used to make the precentages was i first tried to figure out looks is part of SMV. most anecdotes i read gives 80 of smv to looks. In my opinion this is too high. I used various other numbers in mind of the tinder expirements real life relationships in turkey and the west. and 70% of looks seems in my opinion the rational. Every other number downplays looks or money and status.

There can only be a total of 100% so 30% is what remains for money and status. Money in SMV seems more important then status, because it's more essential in survival en reproducten. Money itself gives you status, the reverse doesn't happen. The two are by this not equel so a 15%/15% is not possible. 20% is precentage that represents money importants fairly good without undermining status.

I like to reference this study.

This study came to the conclusion as such.

For initial overall PHYSICAL attractiveness.
About 52% is face.
About 24% is body.
So body and face together for INITIAL PHYSICAL ATTRACTIVENESS = 76%

I guess the other 24% will be styling, grooming, phenotype?, etc..

BUT, obvioulsy. PHYSICAL ATTRACTIVENSS is not total attractivesness. Although imo physicall attractveness (face + body + grooming + style + phenotype (also looks)) is the biggest factor easily, by alot.
Also the factor of status/power, and resources/money matters.

To add. I think the following matters 100%. As in instant rejection 99% of the time: manlet, micropenis, mentalcel (severe autism, etc..).

But I agree.
I think balckpill misunderstands. That body and face matters borderline 80% for PHYSICAL ATTRACTIVENESS.
But overall attractiveness is not just PHYSICAL ATTRACTIVENESS

Your gustimation of 70% of PHYSICAL ATTRACTIVES as part of total attractiveness; might be right in the West. But than in that 70% should include: styling, grooming and phenotype.
The other 30% is than left for: voice, money, status, power, personality traits that are appealing generally (like exraversion, emtionally stable, etc..).

source:

Contributions of the face and body to overall attractiveness

Contributions of the face and body to overall Read more about attractiveness, overall, males, component, symmetry and interaction.

www.yumpu.com

 

[Deleted member 10913]

I like to reference this study.

This study came to the conclusion as such.

For initial overall PHYSICAL attractiveness.
About 52% is face.
About 24% is body.
So body and face together for INITIAL PHYSICAL ATTRACTIVENESS = 76%

I guess the other 24% will be styling, grooming, phenotype?, etc..

BUT, obvioulsy. PHYSICAL ATTRACTIVENSS is not total attractivesness. Although imo physicall attractveness (face + body + grooming + style + phenotype (also looks)) is the biggest factor easily, by alot.
Also the factor of status/power, and resources/money matters.

To add. I think the following matters 100%. As in instant rejection 99% of the time: manlet, micropenis, mentalcel (severe autism, etc..).

Fhysical attractivness in this study i named; Face height and frame, everything out of it falls material(as in easily changable) and social like status. So for me SMV is defined by Looks, Money Status.
Looks is defined by face height and frame, then each component can be discussed. As i pointed in my thread the man important feature is the skull size. the rest can be added as secondary or third place in importance

I did not fully represent every facial component like hair colour, skin colour, eye colour and the nose. Except the nose. Because colour is something that is easliy changable it becomes the least important features. Just as in the psl theory bones are the most important. to benefit from colouring your bones need to meet the threshold.

Looks importance needs to meet the threshold of atleast 55% of smv. There may be a time in history where looks importance was in this precentile, but it was never below. Finding the minimum amount of

 

[eduardkoopman]

Fhysical attractivness in this study i named; Face height and frame, everything out of it falls material(as in easily changable) and social like status.

which study did you use? source?

 

[Deleted member 10913]

which study did you use? source?

Yes, this is the list:

*the following turkish sources talk about ideal female head shape and how it is small and ''heart like''

https://www.ntv.com.tr/galeri/yasam...SFJFGMOwkE6YLJWP2VpW5A/jVAwcTIMzUSzYchxc8D_eg
https://www.hastane.com.tr/saglik/ideal-yuz-guzelliginin-gercek-kurallari-nelerdir.html

*Turkish female opinion

https://www.kizlarsoruyor.com/moda-stil/q83990-onemli-olan-yuz-guzelligi-mi-fizik-guzelligi-mi
https://www.kizlarsoruyor.com/diger/q41453-yuz-guzelligi-mi-vucut-guzelligi-mi

* the following english sources are transgender forums explaining their head size

https://www.susans.org/forums/index.php?topic=154425.0
https://www.healthline.com/health/transgender/facial-feminization-surgery

*T reaction study
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-017-13812-3

*Brain studies
https://www.newscientist.com/articl...e-brain-orgasms-unlock-altered-consciousness/

*Facial attractiveness studies
https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rsos.182189
https://cyberpsychology.eu/article/view/4337/3406

*body
https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rspb.2017.1819


*skull modification
https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smar...eal-evidence-early-skull-reshaping-180972570/