my views on dating and relationships. huge ahh thread DNRDcels GTFOH

DNRDniggerking

DNRDniggerking

BONES. give me more bones
Joined
Aug 13, 2024
Posts
1,672
Reputation
1,765
1. Women and the Evolution of Deception



First thing to keep in mind is that women lie almost 90% of the time, a behavior rooted in evolutionary survival strategies. As the physically weaker gender, women developed high levels of emotional manipulation to navigate interactions with men and ensure their survival. This explains why they often deny their preference for looks—it would risk provoking rage in hopeless men who mistakenly believe they can improve their chances through other means, while overlooking the one critical factor that cannot be changed: genetics.



This deception has become so ingrained that women now lie without being consciously aware of it. It is a survival mechanism, not an intentional act of malice. As a result, nothing they say about their intentions can be fully trusted. The only form of love a man can somewhat rely on is maternal love, driven by the biological imperative to protect offspring.



2. Love and Hypergamy



Love cannot exist without hypergamy. In any relationship where love is present, it is always one-sided. The individual who loves is inevitably less attractive than the one they adore. Women are far more hypergamous than men, placing significantly greater emphasis on their partner being more attractive and higher in status for love and desire to form.



Men, in contrast, are more capable of loving a less attractive partner, but this love is often distorted by desire. Men’s evolutionary mating strategy, which prioritizes spreading their seed widely, means they generally have lower standards for partners.



Looks-matched “normie” couples or less attractive individuals engage in relationships not out of genuine love but to avoid loneliness, satisfy social expectations, and procreate. True, mutual love only exists between the most attractive individuals—what can be described as a “Chad and Stacy.”



3. Relationships and the Dual Mating Strategy



The man she's in a relationship with is fundamentally a “cuck” in her eyes, regardless of how attractive he might be. This perception arises from the woman’s evolutionary dual mating strategy, which drives her to seek safety and resources from an “oofy doofy” provider while desiring the alpha Chad for his superior genetics.



Women’s subconscious programming, honed over millions of years, tells them that Chad does not commit to relationships—he pumps and dumps. When a man enters a relationship to fully commit to a female, it signals to her subconscious that he is not Chad, lowering his sexual appeal in her eyes.



Men who employ red pill tactics or “game” both consciously and subconsciously (the traditional "bad boy" stereotype male does it subconsciously) try to mimic Chad’s aloofness by being uninterested and uncaring, creating the illusion of being alpha. This explains why women are more likely to mistreat, disrespect and cheat on a kind, caring man rather than one who exhibits distant or dismissive behavior—provided both examples are equally attractive.



4. Genetics and Exceptions to the Rules



Genetics are inherently random, with mutations occurring constantly, resulting in variations and exceptions to established patterns. Just because one individual, or a specific friend, experiences something that appears to contradict these principles does not mean the fundamental rules are invalid.



While we are all unique and exhibit diverse traits, these variations do not override the core truths governing human behavior and relationships. Exceptions are merely statistical outliers within a system that operates according to unchangeable evolutionary laws.



5. Intelligence and the Perception of Complexity



If animals were conscious enough to reflect on their existence, they would likely perceive it as intricate and complex. However, humans, with greater intelligence, recognize animal behavior as simple and governed by predictable patterns. This contrast illustrates a profound truth: the more intelligent you become, the more you understand that everything around you follows a strict set of rules, leaving no room for randomness or deviation.



Intelligence reveals that what might seem chaotic or complex to less advanced minds is, in reality, structured and immutable. These rules—whether in nature, society, or human behavior—form the unchangeable foundation of existence. They are not to be broken or ignored, as they define the essence of life itself.



6. The Randomness of Existence



The universe is inherently random, with space, time, and existence emerging without purpose. Life began as simple bacteria, evolving into apes and eventually humans. Although humans consider themselves intelligent, this intelligence is a product of chance, not evidence of a grand design or moral order.



No force exists to enforce fairness or justice in the world. The idea that life operates on moral or fair principles, as blue-pilled individuals suggest, is naive and absurd. Believing that people love each other based on personality or humor is a fantasy with a probability of zero.



To sum up, “Chads and Stacys” currently rule the world, shaping modern culture through art, media, and narratives that glorify their perspective. Hollywood actors, singers, your tiktok feed "influencer" and other cultural icons are overwhelmingly Chads and Stacys, feeding society a blue-pilled illusion stemmed from their happy, privileged experience of life. In reality, the harsh truth is simple: Chads and Stacys dominate, and for everyone else, happy passing by.
 
Last edited:
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: laaltin, Neucher, PRIEST Sv3rige and 1 other person

Dnrd faggot
 
  • JFL
Reactions: DNRDniggerking
What's the point you're trying to make? This is just water.
 
What's the point you're trying to make? This is just water.
I aint trying to make no point, its just a summary of my views, hoping people who disagree or share different opinions come here and discuss
 
  • +1
Reactions: PRIEST Sv3rige
I aint trying to make no point, its just a summary of my views, hoping people who disagree or share different opinions come here and discuss
Only part I disagree with is the part where humans developed from bacteria to where we are now by luck. But I have nothing to back it up with, just my intuition which might be false. I believe in a higher power whether you'd like to call that God or whatnot.
 
  • +1
Reactions: DNRDniggerking
dnr
 
  • +1
Reactions: Neucher
Only part I disagree with is the part where humans developed from bacteria to where we are now by luck. But I have nothing to back it up with, just my intuition which might be false. I believe in a higher power whether you'd like to call that God or whatnot.
I am in a similar situation. islam rules and laws make so much sense to me and I believe someone who knows whats up has made them yet no tangible evidence and I have so many philosophical questions so I'd have to stick with what we have
 
Last edited:
  • +1
Reactions: PRIEST Sv3rige
good post bhai
 
  • +1
  • Love it
Reactions: PRIEST Sv3rige and DNRDniggerking
1. Women and the Evolution of Deception



First thing to keep in mind is that women lie almost 90% of the time, a behavior rooted in evolutionary survival strategies. As the physically weaker gender, women developed high levels of emotional manipulation to navigate interactions with men and ensure their survival. This explains why they often deny their preference for looks—it would risk provoking rage in hopeless men who mistakenly believe they can improve their chances through other means, while overlooking the one critical factor that cannot be changed: genetics.



This deception has become so ingrained that women now lie without being consciously aware of it. It is a survival mechanism, not an intentional act of malice. As a result, nothing they say about their intentions can be fully trusted. The only form of love a man can somewhat rely on is maternal love, driven by the biological imperative to protect offspring.
Can't believe my dumbass never considered the evolutionary implications for this shit

:feelswhat:
 
  • +1
Reactions: DNRDniggerking
read every single pixel bhai
 
  • +1
  • Love it
Reactions: PRIEST Sv3rige and DNRDniggerking
Can't believe my dumbass never considered the evolutionary implications for this shit

:feelswhat:
are you gay all the time or only when gymmaxxing
 
  • JFL
Reactions: PRIEST Sv3rige and Gaygymmaxx
bump again
 
  • +1
Reactions: PRIEST Sv3rige

Similar threads

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top