Name one White invention

DarkTriadBeliever

DarkTriadBeliever

For me to ascend, others must fall
Joined
Aug 22, 2024
Posts
6,193
Reputation
9,411
That benefits only whites

Jfl at bragging about inventing things like computers, Just for some Indian to use it and steal your job :forcedsmile:

Us ethnics have "conquered" all your inventions :ROFLMAO:

I'll start with 2

1. Low birth rates

2. Incest

@Ascending2Tyrone @LiL 369 @Rainman988 @hopecel @MANLETprettyBOY
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: Ascending2Tyrone, MANLETprettyBOY, Magnus Ironblood and 2 others
cucking inferior shitskins, being taller than blacks, better looking than them, and having wider frames and higher t
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Thief, GynoGladiator, barambo and 2 others
That benefits only whites

Jfl at bragging about inventing things like computers, Just for some Indian to use it and steal your job :forcedsmile:

Us ethnics have "conquered" all your inventions :ROFLMAO:

I'll start with 2

1. Low birth rates

2. Incest

@Ascending2Tyrone @LiL 369 @Rainman988 @hopecel @MANLETprettyBOY
>incest

?
 
cucking inferior shitskins, being taller than blacks, better looking than them, and having wider frames and higher t
All this just to have low birth rates is crazy :ROFLMAO:
 
  • +1
Reactions: Ascending2Tyrone
1. Low birth rates
1758749182508
 
  • +1
Reactions: Thief, pfl and barambo
>incest

?
Yes, alot of western Whites are inbred, they blame "Jews" and diet for them looking shit

but the truth is they kept the blood "pure" and fucked their cousins
 
  • Hmm...
Reactions: hopecel
That benefits only whites

Jfl at bragging about inventing things like computers, Just for some Indian to use it and steal your job :forcedsmile:

Us ethnics have "conquered" all your inventions :ROFLMAO:

I'll start with 2

1. Low birth rates

2. Incest

@Ascending2Tyrone @LiL 369 @Rainman988 @hopecel @MANLETprettyBOY
Bleached
 
That benefits only whites

Jfl at bragging about inventing things like computers, Just for some Indian to use it and steal your job :forcedsmile:

Us ethnics have "conquered" all your inventions :ROFLMAO:

I'll start with 2

1. Low birth rates

2. Incest

@Ascending2Tyrone @LiL 369 @Rainman988 @hopecel @MANLETprettyBOY
Pillaging inferior species with our bwc
 
  • +1
Reactions: Thief and pfl
Yes, alot of western Whites are inbred, they blame "Jews" and diet for them looking shit

but the truth is they kept the blood "pure" and fucked their cousins
meanwhile u cant tell the difference between an ape and a black facially
 
  • +1
Reactions: Thief and GoErOnFoids
Yes, alot of western Whites are inbred, they blame "Jews" and diet for them looking shit

but the truth is they kept the blood "pure" and fucked their cousins
Quick important note before the list: the word “race” is not a precise biological unit for humans — genetic variation is best described as variation among populations / isolates / ethnic groups. Measures of inbreeding (coefficient F) are population- and method-specific (pedigree-based vs genomic ROH-based estimates), and they vary a lot within any broad group. Below I give 10 human populations / groups that are commonly reported in the literature as having relatively high mean inbreeding (or very high rates of consanguineous marriage), sorted in descending order by the typical reported approximate inbreeding coefficient (F). I include a citation for each entry and a one-line caveat where needed.




10 human populations / groups by reported inbreeding (approx., descending)​


  1. Samaritans (religious/ethnic isolate)F ≈ 0.06–0.07.
    Extremely high endogamy; classical pedigree studies report mean F ≈ 0.0618 (one of the highest recorded). (rosenberglab.stanford.edu)
  2. Some Hutterite communities (founder religious isolate)F ≈ 0.03–0.04 (mean ≈ 0.034 reported in genomic/pedigree work).
    Large multi-generation pedigrees show substantial autozygosity comparable to close-cousin levels for some individuals. (home.uchicago.edu)
  3. Small highly isolated Jewish groups / certain founder Jewish communitiesF variable; some estimates in the ~0.01–0.03 range or higher for particular subgroups.
    Genomic ROH and pedigree work show elevated homozygosity in some Ashkenazi, Sephardi and small historical Jewish isolates (values vary by study). (PMC)
  4. Old Order Amish (certain settlements)F ≈ 0.01–0.03 (typical reported mean ≈ 0.014–0.026 depending on sample and pedigree depth).
    Average kinship/inbreeding depends on the community and pedigree depth — some studies report mean F ≈ 0.015 (others higher in subsets). (Deep Blue Repositories)
  5. Some small island or regional isolates (e.g., parts of Sardinia, Ibiza, other Mediterranean isolates)F often in the low percent range (≈ 0.005–0.02).
    Isolation/bottlenecks increase ROH and genomic inbreeding measures; exact F depends on the specific island/community and history. (Nature)
  6. Certain Middle Eastern and South/Central Asian populations (regions with high consanguinity: parts of Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, Iran, Lebanon, etc.)population-level F usually averages in the ~0.005–0.03 range, but local subgroups (frequent first-cousin unions) can have offspring F ≈ 0.0156 (first cousins) or higher.
    High rates of cousin marriage inflate average population F; genomic studies show elevated Fhbd in these regions. Country/subpopulation variation is large. (World Population Review)
  7. Druze (endogamous Levantine religious community)F elevated relative to neighboring outbred populations (typical genomic/pedigree estimates variable, often in low-percent range).
    High endogamy and founder effects produce elevated ROH and increased homozygosity in genetic studies of Druze samples. Exact F depends on sample . (ResearchGate)
  8. Certain Native American isolates / small Native communities (historical studies e.g., some Navajo subgroups)F typically small to moderate (examples: Ramah Navajo historic mean ≈ 0.006–0.008 in older pedigree work).
    Many Native groups are not highly inbred overall, but some small or historically bottlenecked communities show measurable inbreeding in pedigree studies. (JSTOR)
  9. Some rural or endogamous South Asian subpopulations / caste groupsF variable; many groups show low-to-moderate F but certain endogamous castes or villages can have elevated values (ranges overlap ~0.005–0.02).
    Long-term endogamy within small castes or villages increases ROH and F; country-level averages mask large within-country variation. (rosenberglab.stanford.edu)
  10. Broad continental populations (e.g., some European, East Asian, African populations)mean F usually very low at the population level (F ≪ 0.01), but individual variation and local isolates exist.
    Most large, outbred continental populations have small mean inbreeding coefficients; localized founder effects or consanguinity can raise F in subgroups. (PLOS)



Short methodology & caveats​


  • Which F? Studies use pedigree-based F (from genealogies) and genomic estimators (runs of homozygosity, F_ROH or F_hbd). Numbers are not directly interchangeable, though they correlate. (PMC)
  • “Race” vs population: I used the term populations / isolates rather than “race” because genetics works at the population/subpopulation level.
  • Huge within-group variation: even a reported “mean F” can hide individuals who are far more or far less inbred.
  • Public-health vs genetics: high consanguinity is a social/cultural practice in many places; describing it is not a value judgement.



If you want, I can now do one of the following (pick one — I’ll run it immediately and show sources):


• produce a ranked table with numeric F values and direct citations for each row (I’ll use the best available pedigree/genomic numbers and mark whether they’re pedigree or genomic),
• produce a map or chart showing regional patterns of consanguinity / mean F (I’ll pull country-level studies), or
• compile original-source quotes / PDF excerpts for any particular population on the list (e.g., Samaritans, Hutterites, Amish).


Which would you like? (If you prefer, say “ranked table” and I’ll create it straight away.)
 
Pillaging inferior species with our bwc
JFL at @pfl liking this post

Neither of you are white, so what is this "our" I'm hearing:ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO:
 
  • Hmm...
Reactions: .Cx
Quick important note before the list: the word “race” is not a precise biological unit for humans — genetic variation is best described as variation among populations / isolates / ethnic groups. Measures of inbreeding (coefficient F) are population- and method-specific (pedigree-based vs genomic ROH-based estimates), and they vary a lot within any broad group. Below I give 10 human populations / groups that are commonly reported in the literature as having relatively high mean inbreeding (or very high rates of consanguineous marriage), sorted in descending order by the typical reported approximate inbreeding coefficient (F). I include a citation for each entry and a one-line caveat where needed.




10 human populations / groups by reported inbreeding (approx., descending)​


  1. Samaritans (religious/ethnic isolate)F ≈ 0.06–0.07.
    Extremely high endogamy; classical pedigree studies report mean F ≈ 0.0618 (one of the highest recorded). (rosenberglab.stanford.edu)
  2. Some Hutterite communities (founder religious isolate)F ≈ 0.03–0.04 (mean ≈ 0.034 reported in genomic/pedigree work).
    Large multi-generation pedigrees show substantial autozygosity comparable to close-cousin levels for some individuals. (home.uchicago.edu)
  3. Small highly isolated Jewish groups / certain founder Jewish communitiesF variable; some estimates in the ~0.01–0.03 range or higher for particular subgroups.
    Genomic ROH and pedigree work show elevated homozygosity in some Ashkenazi, Sephardi and small historical Jewish isolates (values vary by study). (PMC)
  4. Old Order Amish (certain settlements)F ≈ 0.01–0.03 (typical reported mean ≈ 0.014–0.026 depending on sample and pedigree depth).
    Average kinship/inbreeding depends on the community and pedigree depth — some studies report mean F ≈ 0.015 (others higher in subsets). (Deep Blue Repositories)
  5. Some small island or regional isolates (e.g., parts of Sardinia, Ibiza, other Mediterranean isolates)F often in the low percent range (≈ 0.005–0.02).
    Isolation/bottlenecks increase ROH and genomic inbreeding measures; exact F depends on the specific island/community and history. (Nature)
  6. Certain Middle Eastern and South/Central Asian populations (regions with high consanguinity: parts of Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, Iran, Lebanon, etc.)population-level F usually averages in the ~0.005–0.03 range, but local subgroups (frequent first-cousin unions) can have offspring F ≈ 0.0156 (first cousins) or higher.
    High rates of cousin marriage inflate average population F; genomic studies show elevated Fhbd in these regions. Country/subpopulation variation is large. (World Population Review)
  7. Druze (endogamous Levantine religious community)F elevated relative to neighboring outbred populations (typical genomic/pedigree estimates variable, often in low-percent range).
    High endogamy and founder effects produce elevated ROH and increased homozygosity in genetic studies of Druze samples. Exact F depends on sample . (ResearchGate)
  8. Certain Native American isolates / small Native communities (historical studies e.g., some Navajo subgroups)F typically small to moderate (examples: Ramah Navajo historic mean ≈ 0.006–0.008 in older pedigree work).
    Many Native groups are not highly inbred overall, but some small or historically bottlenecked communities show measurable inbreeding in pedigree studies. (JSTOR)
  9. Some rural or endogamous South Asian subpopulations / caste groupsF variable; many groups show low-to-moderate F but certain endogamous castes or villages can have elevated values (ranges overlap ~0.005–0.02).
    Long-term endogamy within small castes or villages increases ROH and F; country-level averages mask large within-country variation. (rosenberglab.stanford.edu)
  10. Broad continental populations (e.g., some European, East Asian, African populations)mean F usually very low at the population level (F ≪ 0.01), but individual variation and local isolates exist.
    Most large, outbred continental populations have small mean inbreeding coefficients; localized founder effects or consanguinity can raise F in subgroups. (PLOS)



Short methodology & caveats​


  • Which F? Studies use pedigree-based F (from genealogies) and genomic estimators (runs of homozygosity, F_ROH or F_hbd). Numbers are not directly interchangeable, though they correlate. (PMC)
  • “Race” vs population: I used the term populations / isolates rather than “race” because genetics works at the population/subpopulation level.
  • Huge within-group variation: even a reported “mean F” can hide individuals who are far more or far less inbred.
  • Public-health vs genetics: high consanguinity is a social/cultural practice in many places; describing it is not a value judgement.



If you want, I can now do one of the following (pick one — I’ll run it immediately and show sources):


• produce a ranked table with numeric F values and direct citations for each row (I’ll use the best available pedigree/genomic numbers and mark whether they’re pedigree or genomic),
• produce a map or chart showing regional patterns of consanguinity / mean F (I’ll pull country-level studies), or
• compile original-source quotes / PDF excerpts for any particular population on the list (e.g., Samaritans, Hutterites, Amish).


Which would you like? (If you prefer, say “ranked table” and I’ll create it straight away.)
Chat gpt ahh response

but I spy Jew and Amish in the top 4, White enough
 
  • Hmm...
Reactions: hopecel
JFL at @pfl liking this post

Neither of you are white, so what is this "our" I'm hearing:ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO:
just ignore what i say theory
us blacks are obviously the most subhuman race dont know why ur coping so hard about it
 
  • +1
Reactions: Thief
Where did you get that idea? No ethnic or negroid would score 93 on the ASVAB
Yeah yeah, one day you guys are black, the next, white

But we all know you're either Hispanic or Indian
 
Chat gpt ahh response

but I spy Jew and Amish in the top 4, White enough
it's only Amish and Jews aren't white

you can call whites out for everything but not for incest, it's a MENA/Asian thing
 
View attachment 4143716

Jfl @ thinking more fertility = more people, every time 1 negroid in shitlandia gets born 5 others die off
Jfl at thinking Starvation is going to kill a population than idiots going to war and not having kids
 
White foids..oh wait :feelshehe:
 
  • JFL
Reactions: DarkTriadBeliever
Yeah yeah, one day you guys are black, the next, white

But we all know you're either Hispanic or Indian
I've never claimed to be a shit skin kys for assuming that retarded shit
 
it's only Amish and Jews aren't white

you can call whites out for everything but not for incest, it's a MENA/Asian thing
Both Jews and Amish share European Dna

Not calling them white is like not calling a Somali black


you must not live in the west, avg anglo saxon white non immigrant, straight from britain is inbred


Brits look like shit for a reason

You can tell which Americans were here before ellis island
 
I've never claimed to be a shit skin kys for assuming that retarded shit
Birds of the same feather flock together, One larper two larper, it's all the same
 
Kys nigga I'll nazi rape your whole nigher family fuck you no more responses to u JFL
You wouldn't do shit Irl :ROFLMAO:
 
  • JFL
Reactions: .Cx
Jfl at thinking Starvation is going to kill a population than idiots going to war and not having kids
Starvation is just one of the million things these subhumans face on the daily, if they aren't cutting each other open with machetes for no reason then they're dying of malaria from a single mosquito

1758750287141


I love when brownoids think their race taking over the world is some kind of W, it would literally ensure the extinction of all mankind regardless of your color, if whites go extinct so do you, you rely on us to keep the world from collapsing
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: pfl, Thief and .Cx
Starvation is just one of the million things these subhumans face on the daily, if they aren't cutting each other open with machetes for no reason then they're dying of malaria from a single mosquito

View attachment 4143750

I love when brownoids think their race taking over the world is some kind of W, it would literally ensure the extinction of all mankind regardless of your color, if whites go extinct so do you, you rely on us to keep the world from collapsing
Jfl, Whites are a plague alongside their best friend Jews

Your grandparents sold you out for a few bucks, now the economy is shit

Whites are gonna kill each other in war, just like Russia and Ukraine are doing


but I love how the whities get so mad at 1 black guy stabbing a random ukraine girl over hundreds of thousands of them dying over some land :ROFLMAO:

the biggest simps in existence
 
Both Jews and Amish share European Dna

Not calling them white is like not calling a Somali black
they do but they're a tiny minority of Europeans anyway

and even then, founders of Ashkenazim were pretty inbred but they mixed a lot later so they're still far better than
you must not live in the west, avg anglo saxon white non immigrant, straight from britain is inbred

Brits look like shit for a reason

You can tell which Americans were here before ellis island
look, even if Brits were the most inbred population of Europe they're still dozens of times less incestous than MENA/SA people... even Japanese are far more inbred

and what's also kinda ironic, most Chads and Stacies are of WASP origin so I don't think they're the ugliest white people, it's actually the opposite
 
Jfl, Whites are a plague alongside their best friend Jews

Your grandparents sold you out for a few bucks, now the economy is shit

Whites are gonna kill each other in war, just like Russia and Ukraine are doing


but I love how the whities get so mad at 1 black guy stabbing a random ukraine girl over hundreds of thousands of them dying over some land :ROFLMAO:

the biggest simps in existence
> Proves a solid point about race demographics and how whites are the only thing keeping the world in order

> AHHHH WHITIEZ ARE JEW PLAGGUEUEEEEEEE AAAHHHHH

1758751304110


Work on your counterarguments
 
  • +1
Reactions: Thief
> Proves a solid point about race demographics and how whites are the only thing keeping the world in order

> AHHHH WHITIEZ ARE JEW PLAGGUEUEEEEEEE AAAHHHHH

View attachment 4143822

Work on your counterarguments
You have no response to what I said, so you post a Wojak :ROFLMAO:


but it doesn't matter, you dumb fucks are gonna end up nuking each other in war
 
You have no response to what I said
What you said was filler for having no response, that's the irony of it, instead of addressing the points I made with literal proof alongside them, you decided to ramble on about Jews and the Charlotte train stabbing
but it doesn't matter, you dumb fucks are gonna end up nuking each other in war
Awesome, hope you get better at this whole racebait thing in the future
 
  • +1
Reactions: Thief
What you said was filler for having no response, that's the irony of it, instead of addressing the points I made with literal proof alongside them, you decided to ramble on about Jews and the Charlotte train stabbing

Awesome, hope you get better at this whole racebait thing in the future
Race bait? Everyone knows 90% of wars are started by Whites and Jews Jfl

These are non negotiable facts

And jfl at you being surprised at me bring up race when you brought it up first
 
That benefits only whites

Jfl at bragging about inventing things like computers, Just for some Indian to use it and steal your job :forcedsmile:

Us ethnics have "conquered" all your inventions :ROFLMAO:

I'll start with 2

1. Low birth rates

2. Incest

@Ascending2Tyrone @LiL 369 @Rainman988 @hopecel @MANLETprettyBOY
the computer your sitting on, the goy soda next to u on ur table, bottled water there too lil nigga, the phone you have next to you, the fruits they adapted for you to eat and taste good, i can literally name like anything and the whites have made it. Cope harder
 
And jfl at you being surprised at me bring up race when you brought it up first
What? This whole thread was about race, which was started by you, I was simply matching the flow of it, did you want me to start talking about dietary advice in your racebait thread or something?
Race bait?
1758752609165

Everyone knows 90% of wars are started by Whites and Jews Jfl

These are non negotiable facts
1758752669221


Interesting, every time I hear of a new war on the news it always seems to be happening in a brownie infested shithole, ethnics love to talk about the 1% of current events that were kicked off by whites but never about what their fellow shitskins are doing every other week
 
  • +1
Reactions: Thief

Similar threads

DarkTriadBeliever
Replies
13
Views
89
KD6Imp33
KD6Imp33
DarkTriadBeliever
Replies
17
Views
191
DarkTriadBeliever
DarkTriadBeliever
DarkTriadBeliever
Replies
21
Views
219
hopecel
hopecel
DarkTriadBeliever
Replies
13
Views
149
DarkTriadBeliever
DarkTriadBeliever
DarkTriadBeliever
Replies
6
Views
94
DarkTriadBeliever
DarkTriadBeliever

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top