Nature doesn't reward superior traits.....

[disillusioned]

It is not how evolution works at all. Survival boils largely down to lucky conditions/circumstances and random events. If nature rewarded superiority then incel betabucks with 160 IQ would be slaying all over the place yet instead women would rather fuck big brawny chads with 85 IQ.

Jfl at thinking nature rewards superior traits. It's largely just luck and randomness.

 

[lookismfugee]

no shit luck is important.right place and right time is like water being wet.
iq aint shit btw

 

[pisslord]

Darwin just got denied by angry squid buddy boyos

 

[FatJattMofo]

retard if you think Good developed are not the most intelligent

 

[Blackout.xl]

Genes come in packages. The good looking chad or Stacy will find a good job with good pay, only rarely will they crash out and end up penniless.

While the incel will struggle and betabuxx for a few decades just to get a good footing

 

[hebbewem]

Good looking People have genrally higher iq .

 

[KEy21]

Nature rewards superior physical traits

That's why retards can get laid if they look good

 

[AbandonShip]

I am convinced that you are low iq.

 

[onnysk]

IQ aint shit

 

[disillusioned]

Good looking People have genrally higher iq .

Wrong. Good looking people typically don't have LOW IQ. Not the same thing. People keep taking that looks&IQ study out of context. Good looking people don't have high IQ on average, they just merely don't have a bad one on average. For good lookers the average was about 105 while for bad lookers it was about 90. That's still pretty damn shit, but it's not the same thing. Your local chad isn't Einstein.

 

[currymax]

It is not how evolution works at all. Survival boils largely down to lucky conditions/circumstances and random events. If nature rewarded superiority then incel betabucks with 160 IQ would be slaying all over the place yet instead women would rather fuck big brawny chads with 85 IQ.

Jfl at thinking nature rewards superior traits. It's largely just luck and randomness.

Put people back in the wild and see how well that theory holds up

 

[disillusioned]

Put people back in the wild and see how well that theory holds up

We don't live in the wild you fucking tool.

Bill Gates > He-man

 

[sexsexsexsex]

orange man in peach

 

[BigBiceps]

It is not how evolution works at all. Survival boils largely down to lucky conditions/circumstances and random events. If nature rewarded superiority then incel betabucks with 160 IQ would be slaying all over the place yet instead women would rather fuck big brawny chads with 85 IQ.

Jfl at thinking nature rewards superior traits. It's largely just luck and randomness.

Intelligence is not all women want. Broad shoulders and tall body means higher survivability in the wild, such guy can protect his family better against hungry wolf pack than a small manlet with no muscularity. We are afterall the same people than people in stone age, we haven't evolved yet. I'm not saying this because I'm 85 iq idiot, but because it's true.

 

[OFFICER_HENRY]

Society has deliberately changed our traits.

 

[rockndogs]

disillusioned thread?

enter

dont read anything at all

scroll down

post his avi

 

[currymax]

We don't live in the wild you fucking tool.

Bill Gates > He-man

I mean, IQ would mean more in the wild because high IQ chads would live, and people like you would die