need an opinion on harmony vs percieved harmony

maxlooksmax

maxlooksmax

to be seen
Joined
Oct 31, 2024
Posts
4,984
Reputation
5,452
i.e if someone has perfect facial harmony but their forehead is slightly too large or small for their facial thirds - if you have a fringe that covers that should that harmony score of the thing you are covering be made into a good score?
 
  • Hmm...
Reactions: sigmamogger and Klasik616
Ehren would go from forum chad to htn if he didn't have a fringe
 
  • +1
Reactions: Aviddegree40571, Arthur the Egyptian and maxlooksmax
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 139053, Joaquin and KT-34
Anybody has perfect facial harmony and yes covering the forehead Will improve your look what type of question is that
 
Covering forehead slightly or having your hair frame your face improves your looks regardless of harmony.
 
  • +1
Reactions: maxlooksmax
this means my 'visible' harmony is 95% then
It's kind of the point, like obviously you're not gonna go bald and ask for rating, hair is part of it, everything is important
 
  • +1
Reactions: maxlooksmax
yes you can fraud with hair
 
  • +1
Reactions: maxlooksmax
Not even psl gods have that harmony
its like 90 overall - slightly below tom cruise (but my angularity, dimorphism aren't good enough to be a PSL god) essentially i need more bones and masculinity
 
its like 90 overall - slightly below tom cruise (but my angularity, dimorphism aren't good enough to be a PSL god) essentially i need more bones and masculinity
Send me your face and Ill calculate your harmony because there is no way you have 90% lmao
 
  • +1
Reactions: maxlooksmax
im dead serious

ESR 44.7
Facial thirds ideal (forehead too small but i cover it so percieved makes it ideal)
canthal tilt 3
FWHR 1.9
JFA 90
Cheekbone setting 81%
total FWHR 1.35
Bigonial width 0.9
Chin to philtrum 2.2
neck width 0.85 (trainable)
mouth to nose 1.52
midface 1:1
eyebrow setting 0.66
eye spacing 1:1
eye aspect 3
upper lip to lower lip 1.6
deviation of IAA to JFA 2
eyebrow tilt 8
bitemporal width 0.9
lower third proportion 31%
ipsilateral alar angle 88
 
Send me your face and Ill calculate your harmony because there is no way you have 90% lmao
read above

everything ideal except neck width and canthal tilt but they are both only t2
 
im dead serious

ESR 44.7
Facial thirds ideal (forehead too small but i cover it so percieved makes it ideal)
canthal tilt 3
FWHR 1.9
JFA 90
Cheekbone setting 81%
total FWHR 1.35
Bigonial width 0.9
Chin to philtrum 2.2
neck width 0.85 (trainable)
mouth to nose 1.52
midface 1:1
eyebrow setting 0.66
eye spacing 1:1
eye aspect 3
upper lip to lower lip 1.6
deviation of IAA to JFA 2
eyebrow tilt 8
bitemporal width 0.9
lower third proportion 31%
ipsilateral alar angle 88
Do u even know how harmony rating work?
 
  • +1
Reactions: maxlooksmax
my front when showing my forehead scores like 86% and side scores 84%

front when covering forehead is like 90% and side still 84%
 
read above

everything ideal except neck width and canthal tilt but they are both only t2
You do not have same harmony as tom Cruise jfl:lul:.
 
  • +1
Reactions: maxlooksmax
What are you even doing here if you have such insane harmony , you would be a walking god
 
  • +1
Reactions: maxlooksmax
What are you even doing here if you have such insane harmony , you would be a walking god
Caged
 
  • +1
Reactions: maxlooksmax
What are you even doing here if you have such insane harmony , you would be a walking god
i mean i am htn/low cl

but harmony is only 40% of the score

40% harmony
25% angularity
20% dimorphism
15% misc
 
also the harmony formula can't measure some things - despite having an ideal chin to philtrum - my philtrum still looks long (because i have a shorter nose)
im too lazy to elab
 
  • +1
Reactions: Joaquin and maxlooksmax
im too lazy to elab
why? i mean i never claimed to be a good but I still have a good face - just my other regions aren't as strong
 
Your harmony is above average but not even near 95% I can tell you, also as you said despite you having good harmony you lack a lot of the other aspects, still looks good tho
measure yourself then - it is
 
  • +1
Reactions: maxlooksmax
Your harmony is above average but not even near 95% I can tell you, also as you said despite you having good harmony you lack a lot of the other aspects, still looks good tho
its not 95 - it is like 87 overall when my forehead is covered because side is still weighted at 0.39
 
Too lazy for It jfl but you are htn
htn-low cl right?

makes sense if i do have 8.7 harmony

(0.4 x 8.7) harmony
(0.25 x 5.5) angularity
(0.2 x 6.25) dimorphism
(0.15 x 6.5) misc

its about a 7/10 a 1/92 face
 
i mean i am htn/low cl

but harmony is only 40% of the score

40% harmony
25% angularity
20% dimorphism
15% misc
You are more in the htn side than cl
 
  • +1
Reactions: maxlooksmax
You are more in the htn side than cl
ok doesn't matter what rating you put me at because every scale is different

but that puts me on par with matthew mconaughey in his prime - that makes sense

and below hayden christensen in his prime

a 1/92 face
 
  • Hmm...
Reactions: Joaquin
htn-low cl right?

makes sense if i do have 8.7 harmony

(0.4 x 8.7) harmony
(0.25 x 5.5) angularity
(0.2 x 6.25) dimorphism
(0.15 x 6.5) misc

its about a 7/10 a 1/92 face
Im sorry but I dont think you are in the 7 range right now, lets say you have an 8,5, harmony, angularity seems 5.5, dimorphism seems Lower than 6.25 for sure, like 5.5, and mssculinity is less than a 6.5, more like 5. I Will say you are a solid 6.5(1 in 15-20face)
 
  • +1
Reactions: maxlooksmax
Im sorry but I dont think you are in the 7 range right now, lets say you have an 8,5, harmony, angularity seems 5.5, dimorphism seems Lower than 6.25 for sure, like 5.5, and mssculinity is less than a 6.5, more like 5. I Will say you are a solid 6.5(1 in 15-20face)
dimorphism isn't just a masculinity score though - i have scored my dimorphism myself i literally have the formula
 
ok doesn't matter what rating you put me at because every scale is different

but that puts me on par with matthew mconaughey in his prime - that makes sense

and below hayden christensen in his prime

a 1/92 face
Matthew is way more dimorphic and masculine than you, I do believe you are similar to Hayden in harmony score and he is probably like 7.25
 
  • +1
Reactions: maxlooksmax
Im sorry but I dont think you are in the 7 range right now, lets say you have an 8,5, harmony, angularity seems 5.5, dimorphism seems Lower than 6.25 for sure, like 5.5, and mssculinity is less than a 6.5, more like 5. I Will say you are a solid 6.5(1 in 15-20face)
i mean you would never mistake me for a woman - i just have lower percieved dimorphism because i am young and blonde - archie cranch has that same effect or chico - you can have decent dimorphism while still looking youthful
 
  • +1
Reactions: Joaquin
Matthew is way more dimorphic and masculine than you, I do believe you are similar to Hayden in harmony score and he is probably like 7.25
hayden scores 74% harmony
 
hayden scores 74% harmony
Fair, similar to you, a bit Lower maybe, but you are below him in the other terms probably, just by seeing Hayden, I consider Him better looking than you, I think he is on a similar level as Lorenzo zurzolo and Lorenzo is near chad level
 
  • +1
Reactions: maxlooksmax
Fair, similar to you, a bit Lower maybe, but you are below him in the other terms probably, just by seeing Hayden, I consider Him better looking than you, I think he is on a similar level as Lorenzo zurzolo and Lorenzo is near chad level
i am also 16 though :forcedsmile:
 
  • +1
Reactions: Joaquin
i mean it definitely gets affected by hair and stuff but theres not really an established method to take it into account when measuring ratios
 
  • +1
Reactions: maxlooksmax
Fair, similar to you, a bit Lower maybe, but you are below him in the other terms probably, just by seeing Hayden, I consider Him better looking than you, I think he is on a similar level as Lorenzo zurzolo and Lorenzo is near chad level
I would say you are 6.75 or 6.5, Hayden 7.25 and Lorenzo 7.5
 
  • +1
Reactions: maxlooksmax
I would say you are 6.75 or 6.5, Hayden 7.25 and Lorenzo 7.5
alr - if i get a thicker neck and cut down from 16% to 12% body fat then my dimorphism will defo improve and my harmony and angularity willl increase aswell to like 7 probably - then i will be at like 7.4
 
alr - if i get a thicker neck and cut down from 16% to 12% body fat then my dimorphism will defo improve and my harmony and angularity willl increase aswell to like 7 probably - then i will be at like 7.4
I dont think so
 
  • +1
Reactions: maxlooksmax
You wont increase that much from 6.75, to 7.4 by just doing that things
harmony 8.5 -> 8.8
dimorphism 6 -> 6.5 (higher bonemass on show and thicker neck)
angularity 5.5 -> 7
misc 6.5 -> 7 - with thicker lashes and a tan

overall score 7.54
 
but i currently score a 7 and you think 6.75 so ig it will be closer to a 7.3 for you
 

Similar threads

N
Replies
6
Views
404
saint
saint
L
Replies
5
Views
166
Joaquin
Joaquin
L
Replies
25
Views
875
They_are_all_whores
They_are_all_whores

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top