Negative entropy cannot be explained by a mere quest for survival

NoHoesinOhio

NoHoesinOhio

Christ's tallest skulled soldier
Joined
Jan 8, 2025
Posts
1,909
Reputation
2,805
if resource allocation exactly matched demand then no organism would survive during the mildest of stressors , and no amount of evolutionary statistical models can explain this as stressors are ubiquitous even in single celled organisms. Therefore unless life has a "baneful maw of eternal hunger" as a springboard, lifeforms cannot emerge. Evolutionary statistics only holds for large scale populations and examing macrocosms, it cannot explain the abiogenesis and original differentiation of prokaryotes and simple eukaryotes. Im still newb in Spencerian biology, and in general late 19th/ early 20th century thought that didnt make darwin out to be some redditor with a sex doll unlike modern materialist conceptions, but survival and sex are overrated if this is true, and ascribing the "purpose" of an organism is to reproduce is as stupid as saying God is created during binary fission. This is why I dont identify as an incel because reproduction is failure by definition
 
Last edited:
  • +1
Reactions: kyrre
Tales
if resource allocation exactly matched demand then no organism would survive during the mildest of stressors , and no amount of evolutionary statistical models can explain this as stressors are ubiquitous even in single celled organisms. Therefore unless life has a "baneful maw of eternal hunger" as a springboard, lifeforms cannot emerge. Evolutionary statistics only holds for large scale populations and examing macrocosms, it cannot explain the abiogenesis and original differentiation of prokaryotes and simple eukaryotes. Im still newb here but survival and sex are overrated if this is true, and ascribing the "purpose" of an organism is to reproduce is as stupid as saying God is created during binary fission. This is why I dont identify as an incel because reproduction is failure by definition
Arent you a fucking satanist
 
it's known that lifeforms were created by god.

nigga trying to reinvent the wheel or smth
 
it's known that lifeforms were created by god.

nigga trying to reinvent the wheel or smth
It doesnt matter, the point is inceldom is not a failure from multiple vantage points. Amoeba divides in two when it can no longer accomodate the energy it has derived from its pseudopodia , reproduction takes place when an organism cannot take for it itself the energy "it" has produced. Yes, reproduction is loss of virility and a sign of decline. The entire organism is a struggle between parts, appropriating the energy produced as a trophic factor for the nerves rather than a surplus resulting in a progeny is a sign of health.
 
  • Woah
Reactions: MoggerGaston

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top