Sociobiology
Fuchsia
- Joined
- Apr 9, 2022
- Posts
- 10,954
- Reputation
- 12,338
The unattainability of modern dating standards are a tool to extract resources from the masses into the elite. This is an emergent phenomenon of inequality, but the inaction of the state in addressing this problem makes them culpable. Controlling dating standards are a status defining tool, people who meet set standards are high status and people who do not meet the standards are low status. Human nature is very sensitive to social status, we are programmed to think highly and cooperate with high status people and think lowly and act aggressively to low status people.
Having the ability to define the dating standards of a society allows you to determine who the masses will cooperative with and who they will aggress against. In terms of low status individuals, aggression doesn't have to be direct or explicit, it can be in the form dehumanising someone, making excuses for harm or injustice done to then, applying negative double standards to them or etc. The resource extracting element comes from the strategic use of defining beauty standards. Let's say for example, you are competing for a high status job and your competitors all have big noses, if you are able to able to make enough people agree that large noses are unattractive that will hurt your competitiors chances of getting the job and therefore increase your chances of getting the job, even though the standards are unrelated to the job role.
Making people appear ugly is a common tactic in propaganda posters, this tactic has been used for a very long time. If you say a certain feature common among an ethnic group is unattractive, then you can get away with harming that ethnic group. If you say a feature of a certain sex is unattractive, then you get away with harming that sex. Lets say an ethinic minority inhabits an area of land that contains resources you want, if can make people believe a feature they possess is unattractive, the masses you convince are going not going to empathise with them, and nobody feels empathy towards them nobody is going to care if you ethnically cleanse them. The ability of this tactic is it's effectiveness to hide actual reason for you wanting to discriminate against a particular group, also because words are cheap it's very easy to spread this propaganda, internationally perhaps.
Because we live in a neoliberal democractic dystopia, our media is controlled by private and public state tyranny. Social media, news, dating apps, movies, etc. are regulated (controlled) by the state, but the misconception of the public and private sectors are seperate, allows both to get away with corruption. To clarify, the private sector is an extension of the public sector not seperate from it, this is why so many previous public companies are now privatised. The reasoning is so that the government can avoid accountability by blaming the private companies they control. People who work for the social media companies, dating apps, movies, etc. are helping push an anti male agenda to allow certain (not all) women into power by allowing harmful dating narratives to remain platformed, if they are questioned on their negligence they can just blame the state WHEN THEY ARE BOTH WORKING WITH THE STATE TO PUSH THE SAME AGENDA. You simply have to look at the movie adolenscence which is clear state propaganda disguised as an independently and privately created film.
We live in a very scary time. Right now, genetically enginnering embryos are real, and couples all over the world are using genetic enginnering to give their children an unfair advantage. This will create infinite inequality and misery, a genetically modifed super elite will control everything in the future because they are just simply superior to everyone else on the molecular level. The only way most people will be able to keep up with the hypergamous dating standards is through this genetically engineering their children. However, because status is relative, this will create a never ending and accelarting cycle of: standards increasing -> people using genetic engineering -> inequality increase -> standards increase. The elites have not stopped this because they benefit from inequality, inequality allows them to control the people without. They are the fucking problem, they caused the blackpill. and I fucking hate them.
Having the ability to define the dating standards of a society allows you to determine who the masses will cooperative with and who they will aggress against. In terms of low status individuals, aggression doesn't have to be direct or explicit, it can be in the form dehumanising someone, making excuses for harm or injustice done to then, applying negative double standards to them or etc. The resource extracting element comes from the strategic use of defining beauty standards. Let's say for example, you are competing for a high status job and your competitors all have big noses, if you are able to able to make enough people agree that large noses are unattractive that will hurt your competitiors chances of getting the job and therefore increase your chances of getting the job, even though the standards are unrelated to the job role.
Making people appear ugly is a common tactic in propaganda posters, this tactic has been used for a very long time. If you say a certain feature common among an ethnic group is unattractive, then you can get away with harming that ethnic group. If you say a feature of a certain sex is unattractive, then you get away with harming that sex. Lets say an ethinic minority inhabits an area of land that contains resources you want, if can make people believe a feature they possess is unattractive, the masses you convince are going not going to empathise with them, and nobody feels empathy towards them nobody is going to care if you ethnically cleanse them. The ability of this tactic is it's effectiveness to hide actual reason for you wanting to discriminate against a particular group, also because words are cheap it's very easy to spread this propaganda, internationally perhaps.
Because we live in a neoliberal democractic dystopia, our media is controlled by private and public state tyranny. Social media, news, dating apps, movies, etc. are regulated (controlled) by the state, but the misconception of the public and private sectors are seperate, allows both to get away with corruption. To clarify, the private sector is an extension of the public sector not seperate from it, this is why so many previous public companies are now privatised. The reasoning is so that the government can avoid accountability by blaming the private companies they control. People who work for the social media companies, dating apps, movies, etc. are helping push an anti male agenda to allow certain (not all) women into power by allowing harmful dating narratives to remain platformed, if they are questioned on their negligence they can just blame the state WHEN THEY ARE BOTH WORKING WITH THE STATE TO PUSH THE SAME AGENDA. You simply have to look at the movie adolenscence which is clear state propaganda disguised as an independently and privately created film.
We live in a very scary time. Right now, genetically enginnering embryos are real, and couples all over the world are using genetic enginnering to give their children an unfair advantage. This will create infinite inequality and misery, a genetically modifed super elite will control everything in the future because they are just simply superior to everyone else on the molecular level. The only way most people will be able to keep up with the hypergamous dating standards is through this genetically engineering their children. However, because status is relative, this will create a never ending and accelarting cycle of: standards increasing -> people using genetic engineering -> inequality increase -> standards increase. The elites have not stopped this because they benefit from inequality, inequality allows them to control the people without. They are the fucking problem, they caused the blackpill. and I fucking hate them.