New Mycenaean reconstruction proves that they were in fact a ‘northern’ type of people. But how does it conflict with Mycenaean genetic studies?

[Olivecel]

Here’s reconstruction of the Mycenaean girl,

Digital Reconstruction Unveils Face of Mycenaean Era Royal Woman - GreekReporter.com

Experts published a lifelike face reconstruction of a Mycenaean-era royal woman who lived 3,500 years ago in the same area as Homer's heroes.

greekreporter.com

But genetic studies on Mycenaean samples suggest that they were closest to modern Greeks and southern Italians, and to a lesser-extent, even some Levantine groups would score quite close,

https://www.science.org/content/article/greeks-really-do-have-near-mythical-origins-ancient-dna-reveals#:~:text=Now%2C%20ancient%20DNA%20suggests%20that%20living%20Greeks,of%20DNA%20from%20later%20migrations%20to%20Greece.&text=Modern%20Greeks%20share%20similar%20proportions%20of%20DNA,more%20DNA%20from%20later%20migrations%20to%20Greece.

But the reconstruction does not represent the results of these genetic studies at all. The girl does not look like a typical Greek or southern Italian, and CERTAINLY not a Levantine..
I am aware that there are some Greeks and other Mediterraneans who may look alike her phenotype. But she looks more generally ‘northern/western’ (Irish, English, Scottish, and perhaps French). Not much like the average medcel. And what are the odds that they just so ‘happened’ to ‘coincidentally’ find the 2/15 Greek with these northern features.. doesn’t seem likely.
Very conflicting studies from both ends, and I don’t know which to believe.

 

[Olivecel]

So one of the studies have to be fake.
Is it the genetic studies, or the reconstruction of the girl?