new psl scale

[the next o'pry]

okay, so everyone from this forum is invited to a chat group to create a new psl scale.
The reason why I am making such a scale is because most people rate according to how they feel.
The ratings are vague, confusing and varied.
i got an idea like this

We set - no cheekbones invisible/non-protruding as 0 points.
- low set, almost invisible, non-protruding cheekbones as 0.05 points
- high set non existent cheekbones as 0.1 points
- low set slightly protruding cheekbones as 0.15 points
- high set slightly protruding cheekbones as 0.2 points
- low set sufficiently protruding cheekbones as 0.25 points
- high set sufficiently protruding cheekbones as 0.3 points
- symmetry and proportionality gets 0.05 points as a bonus
What I just posted a picture of is just a rough draft to this plan.
rating is so much more complex.
thats why i need some help to make this new rating scale complete
Also guys. For the scale we should provide real life examples and pictures. Many times the pics are confusing once we reach the 7 range. Imo

everyone its invited, if you want to be part of this just send me a message

 

[Deleted member 3593]

what if a certain race gets a negative PSL point deduction?

 

[the next o'pry]

what if a certain race gets a negative PSL point deduction?

well, thats something we are going to discuss this is just a draft i still need to develop each thing, wanna join us?

 

[Deleted member 4310]

Is height and frame taken into account? I Believe face is the most important but just curious

 

[the next o'pry]

Is height and frame taken into account? I Believe face is the most important but just curious

i was thinking about make one scale only with face and other one with height, frame, face and dick

 

[Deleted member 685]

Looks good but I'm too busy at the moment bro

 

[Deleted member 3202]

i was thinking about make one scale only with face and other one with height, frame, face and dick

I'm busy as well. I'll help when I can though.

 

[the next o'pry]

i can add both of you to the group and help when you can

 

[LordNorwood]

@Mayorga
@Wincel

 

[the next o'pry]

@Wincel

 

[Deleted member 2621]

okay, so everyone from this forum is invited to a chat group to create a new psl scale.
The reason why I am making such a scale is because most people rate according to how they feel.
The ratings are vague, confusing and varied.
i got an idea like this
View attachment 196887
We set - no cheekbones invisible/non-protruding as 0 points.
- low set, almost invisible, non-protruding cheekbones as 0.05 points
- high set non existent cheekbones as 0.1 points
- low set slightly protruding cheekbones as 0.15 points
- high set slightly protruding cheekbones as 0.2 points
- low set sufficiently protruding cheekbones as 0.25 points
- high set sufficiently protruding cheekbones as 0.3 points
- symmetry and proportionality gets 0.05 points as a bonus
What I just posted a picture of is just a rough draft to this plan.
rating is so much more complex.
thats why i need some help to make this new rating scale complete
Also guys. For the scale we should provide real life examples and pictures. Many times the pics are confusing once we reach the 7 range. Imo

everyone its invited, if you want to be part of this just send me a message

-somewhere in between 0.2 to 1.5 for obvious fails (narrow mouth, giant ears, no forehead, round forehead...)

 

[Deleted member 2933]

Great effort, but no one cares tbh, to the void u go.

 

[Titbot]

add me op

 

[chadpreetinthemaking]

There's no mathematical way to precisely calculate, you just look at a face, and depending on how aesthetic it is and its overall appeal to women.

 

[Deleted member 2846]

There's no mathematical way to precisely calculate, you just look at a face, and depending on how aesthetic it is and its overall appeal to women.

exactly. this is pure basement science jfl. trying to quantify attractiveness

 

[chadpreetinthemaking]

exactly. this is pure basement science jfl. trying to quantify attractiveness

I mean you kinda can, but at the same time you kinda cant, its complex, mathematics only plays a role in beauty as far as certain ratios are concerned. We just need to keep in mind symmetry is universally beautiful, and masculine facial development gets women wet, as well as health indicators

 

[BigBoy]

add me to the gc

 

[Deleted member 2012]

@Deliciadecu

 

[Bennett]

Getting way too into this, only rating scale that matters is p in v count.

 

[Deleted member 3195]

Nice

 

[Patriot]

Any progress here?