New ranking system that adjusts PSL (superior)

D

Deleted member 24002

Mistral
Joined
Nov 18, 2022
Posts
2,163
Reputation
2,445
This scale makes good changes to PSL in my opinion. PSL offers very little variation and invokes exaggerations both ways. I’m not claiming to be a great rater or that this system is the best, but it’s at the very least better than what we currently have. This is face only. Any and all input or criticism is appreciated.

1/10: Low Tier Ugly (LTU)
7BFFAC9E 4B8D 49C0 A1CC BEECFC724AEC

Extremely rare, deformities are present, will never achieve normie status.

2/10: Mid Tier Ugly (MTU)
AD072CFA 82F7 4A63 BDC0 85EFCA4B02C9

Not deformed, but almost all features are very unattractive. Strikingly Ugly.

3/10: High Tier Ugly (HTU)
7AA8D91E A828 4431 A60C 04CC61213486

Multiple major failos, considered unattractive by the whole of society, but not shockingly so. Has potential to ascend to normie status.

4/10: Low Tier Normie (LTN)
93C5D975 AA10 4704 AD14 1A4C408948AB

1-2 major failos, nobody considers them attractive but they’re not ugly either, appearance is a minor hinderance on their quality of life.

5/10: Mid Tier Normie (MTN)
AE0754C6 9A9B 41F3 BF16 4865264750C1

Likely has high facial averageness, most people would have no opinion on their appearance, could be attractive in a niche, their appearance has no effect on their quality of life.

6/10: High Tier Normie (HTN)
B9780FB7 50C4 4D81 93FB 1B94AE23B85E

No major failos, likely very average and harmonious features, opinion on their appearance is generally positive but not enough to provide any major improvement on their quality of life.

7/10: Low Tier Attractive (LTA)
A6721310 DDA9 4447 9277 F1E64D990F2F

Where appearance starts to give you an advantage in life over others. Universally attractive, but not strikingly so. Mogs the average man, but isn’t modelling anytime soon.

8/10: Mid Tier Attractive (MTA)
195EB905 E1DA 49A1 A0D2 E9D40F6C97C8

Enter chad status, good looking enough for any woman, striking features, major advantage in life.

9/10: High Tier Attractive (HTA)
9A4BE807 B15B 4BA0 8895 B68D25C9989B

Mogs everybody in their day to day, the most attractive man in any scenario (school, work, party, club), rarely work regular jobs as they are probably modelling or acting, women and opportunities are thrown their way.

10/10: Genetical Anomalies
D301E49C 8AC9 43D3 8007 0D317DB0A93D

Face handcrafted by god. You will likely never see a 10/10 in person in your lifetime.

I believe that the vast majority of men lie in between 3 and 7. Thoughts?
 

Attachments

  • BEA1D0B7-5F8F-4354-9FF2-CB633E09CE3F.webp
    85.8 KB · Views: 0
  • 01842E78-A2F4-42F2-8126-3A75E07504B7.webp
    433.9 KB · Views: 0
  • 87693A4E-3C57-4B59-AD8E-48E82EE2A6E1.jpeg
    87693A4E-3C57-4B59-AD8E-48E82EE2A6E1.jpeg
    363.8 KB · Views: 0
  • FECE091C-63D9-4A9B-8C74-D9B55FF9C33D.jpeg
    FECE091C-63D9-4A9B-8C74-D9B55FF9C33D.jpeg
    193.6 KB · Views: 0
  • 09AE4255-E410-41B8-A4A5-7AD6ABCC53C0.webp
    74 KB · Views: 0
  • 92855B87-B1FE-4ED9-9D1C-D0096C867052.jpeg
    92855B87-B1FE-4ED9-9D1C-D0096C867052.jpeg
    363.8 KB · Views: 0
Last edited:
  • +1
  • JFL
  • Love it
Reactions: mtn/zygos, Deleted member 19442, Deleted member 15164 and 4 others
@Grel Hellscream @eyelidcel @roddypolarbear04 @merelyademigod @gribsufer1 thoughts?
 
Based decile system advocate. I also like the uniformity of the acronyms, they'd be a more formal way of saying "subhuman" or "chad," but with even more nuance.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 24002
1-10 mogs
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 25938
Based decile system advocate. I also like the uniformity of the acronyms, they'd be a more formal way of saying "subhuman" or "chad," but with even more nuance.
Yes that’s one of the things I dislike the most about PSL raters, subhuman is applied to way too many people and chadlite-chad is too high a threshold
 
  • +1
Reactions: merelyademigod, Deleted member 21661 and Deleted member 25938
I actually rally like it
 
  • Love it
Reactions: Deleted member 24002
disagree. 5,6,7 are a group. once you hit 8 you start to get chad treatment. no sense in grouping 4 numbers together. 7s and 8s live drastically different lives tbh
 
  • Hmm...
  • JFL
Reactions: NoHoesinOhio and Deleted member 24002
disagree. 5,6,7 are a group. once you hit 8 you start to get chad treatment. no sense in grouping 4 numbers together. 7s and 8s live drastically different lives tbh
I feel like there has to be a bridge between HTN and "chadlite" tho. Like what would you rate these 2
1665171904-young-photos-matt-damon-birthday-hollywood-actor.jpg
1049956-pearl-harbor-2001.jpg

Theyre a cut above Tom Holland but still probably not chads
 
This scale makes good changes to PSL in my opinion. PSL offers very little variation and invokes exaggerations both ways. I’m not claiming to be a great rater or that this system is the best, but it’s at the very least better than what we currently have. This is face only. Any and all input or criticism is appreciated.

1/10: Low Tier Ugly (LTU)
View attachment 2147925
Extremely rare, deformities are present, will never achieve normie status.

2/10: Mid Tier Ugly (MTU)
View attachment 2147932
Not deformed, but almost all features are very unattractive. Strikingly Ugly.

3/10: High Tier Ugly (HTU)
View attachment 2147936
Multiple major failos, considered unattractive by the whole of society, but not shockingly so. Has potential to ascend to normie status.

4/10: Low Tier Normie (LTN)
View attachment 2147940
1-2 major failos, nobody considers them attractive but they’re not ugly either, appearance is a minor hinderance on their quality of life.

5/10: Mid Tier Normie (MTN)
View attachment 2147968
Likely has high facial averageness, most people would have no opinion on their appearance, could be attractive in a niche, their appearance has no effect on their quality of life.

6/10: High Tier Normie (HTN)
View attachment 2147969
No major failos, likely very average and harmonious features, opinion on their appearance is generally positive but not enough to provide any major improvement on their quality of life.

7/10: Low Tier Attractive (LTA)
View attachment 2147966
Where appearance starts to give you an advantage in life over others. Universally attractive, but not strikingly so. Mogs the average man, but isn’t modelling anytime soon.

8/10: Mid Tier Attractive (MTA)
View attachment 2147957
Enter chad status, good looking enough for any woman, striking features, major advantage in life.

9/10: High Tier Attractive (HTA)
View attachment 2147958
Mogs everybody in their day to day, the most attractive man in any scenario (school, work, party, club), rarely work regular jobs as they are probably modelling or acting, women and opportunities are thrown their way.

10/10: Genetical Anomalies
View attachment 2147961
Face handcrafted by god. You will likely never see a 10/10 in person in your lifetime.

I believe that the vast majority of men lie in between 3 and 7. Thoughts?
Cringe low tier normie MOGS that mid tier normie lol
 
  • +1
Reactions: MoggsWithBoness and roddypolarbear04
That incel famous guy should be number 3 not 2 they should be switched also
 
not an asian in sight; this is racism
 
I'm a 4/10 or 5/10 based on this scale.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 24002
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 24002
This scale makes good changes to PSL in my opinion. PSL offers very little variation and invokes exaggerations both ways. I’m not claiming to be a great rater or that this system is the best, but it’s at the very least better than what we currently have. This is face only. Any and all input or criticism is appreciated.

1/10: Low Tier Ugly (LTU)
View attachment 2147925
Extremely rare, deformities are present, will never achieve normie status.

2/10: Mid Tier Ugly (MTU)
View attachment 2147932
Not deformed, but almost all features are very unattractive. Strikingly Ugly.

3/10: High Tier Ugly (HTU)
View attachment 2147936
Multiple major failos, considered unattractive by the whole of society, but not shockingly so. Has potential to ascend to normie status.

4/10: Low Tier Normie (LTN)
View attachment 2147940
1-2 major failos, nobody considers them attractive but they’re not ugly either, appearance is a minor hinderance on their quality of life.

5/10: Mid Tier Normie (MTN)
View attachment 2147968
Likely has high facial averageness, most people would have no opinion on their appearance, could be attractive in a niche, their appearance has no effect on their quality of life.

6/10: High Tier Normie (HTN)
View attachment 2147969
No major failos, likely very average and harmonious features, opinion on their appearance is generally positive but not enough to provide any major improvement on their quality of life.

7/10: Low Tier Attractive (LTA)
View attachment 2147966
Where appearance starts to give you an advantage in life over others. Universally attractive, but not strikingly so. Mogs the average man, but isn’t modelling anytime soon.

8/10: Mid Tier Attractive (MTA)
View attachment 2147957
Enter chad status, good looking enough for any woman, striking features, major advantage in life.

9/10: High Tier Attractive (HTA)
View attachment 2147958
Mogs everybody in their day to day, the most attractive man in any scenario (school, work, party, club), rarely work regular jobs as they are probably modelling or acting, women and opportunities are thrown their way.

10/10: Genetical Anomalies
View attachment 2147961
Face handcrafted by god. You will likely never see a 10/10 in person in your lifetime.

I believe that the vast majority of men lie in between 3 and 7. Thoughts?
I vote that we adopt this system
 
This scale makes good changes to PSL in my opinion. PSL offers very little variation and invokes exaggerations both ways. I’m not claiming to be a great rater or that this system is the best, but it’s at the very least better than what we currently have. This is face only. Any and all input or criticism is appreciated.

1/10: Low Tier Ugly (LTU)
View attachment 2147925
Extremely rare, deformities are present, will never achieve normie status.

2/10: Mid Tier Ugly (MTU)
View attachment 2147932
Not deformed, but almost all features are very unattractive. Strikingly Ugly.

3/10: High Tier Ugly (HTU)
View attachment 2147936
Multiple major failos, considered unattractive by the whole of society, but not shockingly so. Has potential to ascend to normie status.

4/10: Low Tier Normie (LTN)
View attachment 2147940
1-2 major failos, nobody considers them attractive but they’re not ugly either, appearance is a minor hinderance on their quality of life.

5/10: Mid Tier Normie (MTN)
View attachment 2147968
Likely has high facial averageness, most people would have no opinion on their appearance, could be attractive in a niche, their appearance has no effect on their quality of life.

6/10: High Tier Normie (HTN)
View attachment 2147969
No major failos, likely very average and harmonious features, opinion on their appearance is generally positive but not enough to provide any major improvement on their quality of life.

7/10: Low Tier Attractive (LTA)
View attachment 2147966
Where appearance starts to give you an advantage in life over others. Universally attractive, but not strikingly so. Mogs the average man, but isn’t modelling anytime soon.

8/10: Mid Tier Attractive (MTA)
View attachment 2147957
Enter chad status, good looking enough for any woman, striking features, major advantage in life.

9/10: High Tier Attractive (HTA)
View attachment 2147958
Mogs everybody in their day to day, the most attractive man in any scenario (school, work, party, club), rarely work regular jobs as they are probably modelling or acting, women and opportunities are thrown their way.

10/10: Genetical Anomalies
View attachment 2147961
Face handcrafted by god. You will likely never see a 10/10 in person in your lifetime.

I believe that the vast majority of men lie in between 3 and 7. Thoughts?
Not bad
 
I genuinely like it tbh.
 
Excellent system
 
This swiftly deals with the urgent question of the (((oofy doofy pillers)))
 
this ranking system actually makes system
 
This scale makes good changes to PSL in my opinion. PSL offers very little variation and invokes exaggerations both ways. I’m not claiming to be a great rater or that this system is the best, but it’s at the very least better than what we currently have. This is face only. Any and all input or criticism is appreciated.

1/10: Low Tier Ugly (LTU)
View attachment 2147925
Extremely rare, deformities are present, will never achieve normie status.

2/10: Mid Tier Ugly (MTU)
View attachment 2147932
Not deformed, but almost all features are very unattractive. Strikingly Ugly.

3/10: High Tier Ugly (HTU)
View attachment 2147936
Multiple major failos, considered unattractive by the whole of society, but not shockingly so. Has potential to ascend to normie status.

4/10: Low Tier Normie (LTN)
View attachment 2147940
1-2 major failos, nobody considers them attractive but they’re not ugly either, appearance is a minor hinderance on their quality of life.

5/10: Mid Tier Normie (MTN)
View attachment 2147968
Likely has high facial averageness, most people would have no opinion on their appearance, could be attractive in a niche, their appearance has no effect on their quality of life.

6/10: High Tier Normie (HTN)
View attachment 2147969
No major failos, likely very average and harmonious features, opinion on their appearance is generally positive but not enough to provide any major improvement on their quality of life.

7/10: Low Tier Attractive (LTA)
View attachment 2147966
Where appearance starts to give you an advantage in life over others. Universally attractive, but not strikingly so. Mogs the average man, but isn’t modelling anytime soon.

8/10: Mid Tier Attractive (MTA)
View attachment 2147957
Enter chad status, good looking enough for any woman, striking features, major advantage in life.

9/10: High Tier Attractive (HTA)
View attachment 2147958
Mogs everybody in their day to day, the most attractive man in any scenario (school, work, party, club), rarely work regular jobs as they are probably modelling or acting, women and opportunities are thrown their way.

10/10: Genetical Anomalies
View attachment 2147961
Face handcrafted by god. You will likely never see a 10/10 in person in your lifetime.

I believe that the vast majority of men lie in between 3 and 7. Thoughts?
Basically a really good version of the normie scale
 

Similar threads

noahwillascend
Replies
10
Views
186
vexnaut
vexnaut
magdel
Replies
10
Views
896
druiglooksmaxer
druiglooksmaxer
DNRDniggerking
Replies
15
Views
197
DNRDniggerking
DNRDniggerking
Ascend_forever
Replies
2
Views
166
Ascend_forever
Ascend_forever

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top