newgens fucked up the rating scale

WELOVELOOKS

WELOVELOOKS

show me the evidence
Joined
Feb 9, 2024
Posts
3,139
Reputation
3,704
retard newgens here rate 1 point lower for literally no reason, a guy who would rarely get any ratings below HTN now gets 6/10 people callinbg him MTN

site and people are an utter joke, shit at rating nowadays
 
  • +1
  • Ugh..
Reactions: Kazey, voluptuousness, ThugggButt and 5 others
breh... kek, everyone above 2021 is a newgen, and no one relied on ratings here anyway
 
breh... kek, everyone above 2021 is a newgen, and no one relied on ratings here anyway
0 pursuit of genuine objective looks knowledge in this shit hole

why did i get unbanned, im actualy pised offf i just saw a clear HTN+ get rated MTN 20 times
 
  • +1
Reactions: hypernormie
breh... kek, everyone above 2021 is a newgen, and no one relied on ratings here anyway
i'd say above summer 2023, looksmax went mainstream aug 2023
 
  • +1
Reactions: Kater Maxxing and WELOVELOOKS
0 pursuit of genuine objective looks knowledge in this shit hole

why did i get unbanned, im actualy pised offf i just saw a clear HTN+ get rated MTN 20 times
i mean, there is no objective looks knowledge, there is no objective measurement for bones, the only measurement for stuff is dominance vs recessive but besides extremes, it has no ties to attraction

the closest thing to objective measurement is overall how girls perceive you; if the pheno is perceived well then there is simply no pheno flaws (all flaws would reside in real life, the person who has the pheno)
 
i'd say above summer 2023, thats when looksmax went newgen
fersure there was some weird switch with all the tiktok fuckery, it has changed so drastically as someone whos known about this site for minmum 5 years
 
  • +1
Reactions: 134applesauce456
oh... of course it went mainstream right after you joined
yes nigga

i promise I didn't find this site through k shami or some mainstream tiktoker

I was alt right and found it through that community
 
  • +1
Reactions: Kater Maxxing and WELOVELOOKS
Well it's because hypergamy increased.

Ryan Gosling was CL in the 2000s but is high LTN in the 2020s.
 
  • JFL
Reactions: qazw
Well it's because hypergamy increased.

Ryan Gosling was CL in the 2000s but is high LTN in the 2020s.
and this is fucking stupid

looks standard really didnt go up that much incel standard just went up bedcause they started morphing peoples faces and got more and more looksobsessed bdd autism peoples standards didnt actually go up that much as a whole
 
and this is fucking stupid

looks standard really didnt go up that much incel standard just went up bedcause they started morphing peoples faces and got more and more looksobsessed bdd autism peoples standards didnt actually go up that much as a whole
If you ran a Ryan Gosling lookalike in 2016 when Tinder started he would slay HTBs.

If you ran a Ryan Gosling lookalike in 2025 on Tinder he would get LTBs and femcels.

@6ft4
 
and this is fucking stupid

looks standard really didnt go up that much incel standard just went up bedcause they started morphing peoples faces and got more and more looksobsessed bdd autism peoples standards didnt actually go up that much as a whole
Overall you're looking for an easy way out of looksmaxxing even harder.
 
Yes but also the sub rating shit they came up with is really cool and useful
 
If you ran a Ryan Gosling lookalike in 2016 when Tinder started he would slay HTBs.

If you ran a Ryan Gosling lookalike in 2025 on Tinder he would get LTBs and femcels.

@6ft4
dont think this is true, either way tinder is not irl. any stats on this or what cause women have found like only 30% of men attractive on tinder for forever now
 
  • +1
Reactions: 134applesauce456
If you ran a Ryan Gosling lookalike in 2016 when Tinder started he would slay HTBs.

If you ran a Ryan Gosling lookalike in 2025 on Tinder he would get LTBs and femcels.

@6ft4

@chrishell

thought id tag you since he's talking about ryan gosling
 
dont think this is true, either way tinder is not irl. any stats on this or what cause women have found like only 30% of men attractive on tinder for forever now
Yeah most attractive women only swipe on the top 0.5% of profiles on dating apps in general and the ugly ones only swipe on MAX the top 15% of profiles on dating apps.

Online is real life. Young attractive women are glued to their phone and would rather not date if you don't meet their standard.

They have more than enough simps. They don't need your money. They want a combination of top 20% looks and status.
 
Everyone who arrived after covid is a newfag
fair enough you can defiantly claim ur an og with that join date

but it is a basic fact that this community blew up and went mainstream around end of july - august 2023
 
retard newgens here rate 1 point lower for literally no reason, a guy who would rarely get any ratings below HTN now gets 6/10 people callinbg him MTN

site and people are an utter joke, shit at rating nowadays
IKR only rating i ever see is mtn, these tards could see someone better looking than anyone in their classes and just be like meh mtn you are recessed and should rope
 
Yeah most attractive women only swipe on the top 0.5% of profiles on dating apps in general and the ugly ones only swipe on MAX the top 15% of profiles on dating apps.

Online is real life. Young attractive women are glued to their phone and would rather not date if you don't meet their standard.

They have more than enough simps. They don't need your money. They want a combination of top 20% looks and status.
this is just cope

50% of hot girls i see on social media arent even dating chads
 
this is just cope

50% of hot girls i see on social media arent even dating chads
Most women aren't dating at all so what's your point?
 
Joined Oct 20, 2023
1736716814742
 
Yeah most attractive women only swipe on the top 0.5% of profiles on dating apps in general and the ugly ones only swipe on MAX the top 15% of profiles on dating apps.

Online is real life. Young attractive women are glued to their phone and would rather not date if you don't meet their standard.

They have more than enough simps. They don't need your money. They want a combination of top 20% looks and status.
of course if hot girls are using an app to hook up with dudes they r gonna hook up with the hottest guys

its a hook up site

people rarely fiind love, they r not hqnp girls for the most part anyways

they dont represent women as a whole lmao, thats like saying girls on onlyfan's opinions or decisions hold some weight
 
Yeah most attractive women only swipe on the top 0.5% of profiles on dating apps in general and the ugly ones only swipe on MAX the top 15% of profiles on dating apps.

Online is real life. Young attractive women are glued to their phone and would rather not date if you don't meet their standard.

They have more than enough simps. They don't need your money. They want a combination of top 20% looks and status.
legit like 7% of females us tinder lmao idk why you idiots think its like some good representative of their general opinion those girls are mainly low class whores and of course chad chasers or money chasers or attention chasers
 
fucking idiots using confirmation bias at any stop to confirm their defeatist pussy mentality is insane
 
legit like 7% of females us tinder lmao idk why you idiots think its like some good representative of their general opinion those girls are mainly low class whores and of course chad chasers or money chasers or attention chasers
I use Bumble and it's the same thing except the girls are less attractive (more normal/normie looking) and are more stuck up. I'm banned on Tinder and Hinge. Can't comment on them post 2021.
 
of course if hot girls are using an app to hook up with dudes they r gonna hook up with the hottest guys

its a hook up site

people rarely fiind love, they r not hqnp girls for the most part anyways

they dont represent women as a whole lmao, thats like saying girls on onlyfan's opinions or decisions hold some weight
Bumble and Hinge legit have HQNP on there
 
indeed. they underrate both because of ridiculous exaggerated morphs fucked their perception, and some weird desire to be seen as more knowledgeable(like using terms that don't fix in the post's context or using arbitrary ratings like low HTN or high MTN)
 
  • +1
Reactions: WELOVELOOKS
indeed. they underrate both because of ridiculous exaggerated morphs fucked their perception, and some weird desire to be seen as more knowledgeable(like using terms that don't fix in the post's context or using arbitrary ratings like low HTN or high MTN)
the whole morping retardation is legit hilarious and that comes from someone who morphed a ton of people i didnt become autistic because of it thought i just accepted it wasnt realistic because you can morph someone who is realistically a 10/10 if were talking about simply the highest calbier of human possible, which i personaly dont get the concept of why someone cant be a 10/10. if there is no 10/10 besides something that doesnt exist, whats the point in rating humans to 10/10 and having a scale where its unobtainable
 

Similar threads

otal_duu
Replies
20
Views
193
otal_duu
otal_duu
E
Replies
6
Views
160
Swarthy Knight
Swarthy Knight
keanisSub3
Replies
29
Views
819
keanisSub3
keanisSub3

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top