No. Fillers are NOT shit

CookieGuy

CookieGuy

what’s a king to a guy?
Joined
Sep 5, 2024
Posts
11,186
Reputation
11,955
I see this forum won’t stop falling for the Propoganda of implants being better and filler migration. Be so fucking for real.

Fillers are more able to properly give you definition relative to your face, while implants are unpredictable.

Oh you happen to have slight migration after 6 or 7 years, someone does it wrong, luckily they don’t have to cut up your face again, you just get a filler dissolver
 
  • +1
Reactions: blite, valentine, Joystick_Jiggy and 10 others
I agree that filler migration is overstated, but isn't it cheaper long term to just get implants?
 
  • +1
  • Woah
Reactions: Joystick_Jiggy and CookieGuy
I see this forum won’t stop falling for the Propoganda of implants being better and filler migration. Be so fucking for real.

Fillers are more able to properly give you definition relative to your face, while implants are unpredictable.

Oh you happen to have slight migration after 6 or 7 years, someone does it wrong, luckily they don’t have to cut up your face again, you just get a filler dissolver
6 or 7 years? Fuck yeahhh 67 67 67 67 67 67 67 67:p:p:p:p LOL
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: gunterrr, Joystick_Jiggy, o_Owtf and 2 others
I agree that filler migration is overstated, but isn't it cheaper long term to just get implants?
So. I mean yeah but it’s like paying for something like a house or a car, most people ain’t paying 30k up front. But over 30 years it’ll cost you more.

Also fillers will give better results anyways
 
  • +1
Reactions: Assymetry, exvh, yussimania and 2 others
So. I mean yeah but it’s like paying for something like a house or a car, most people ain’t paying 30k up front. But over 30 years it’ll cost you more.

Also fillers will give better results anyways
You right gang
 
  • +1
Reactions: CookieGuy
So. I mean yeah but it’s like paying for something like a house or a car, most people ain’t paying 30k up front. But over 30 years it’ll cost you more.

Also fillers will give better results anyways
have you tried fillers?
 
  • Hmm...
Reactions: CookieGuy
  • +1
Reactions: browncurrycel
I see this forum won’t stop falling for the Propoganda of implants being better and filler migration. Be so fucking for real.

Fillers are more able to properly give you definition relative to your face, while implants are unpredictable.

Oh you happen to have slight migration after 6 or 7 years, someone does it wrong, luckily they don’t have to cut up your face again, you just get a filler dissolver
True, been using them for 5 years and only positives yet
 
  • +1
Reactions: exvh and CookieGuy
I see this forum won’t stop falling for the Propoganda of implants being better and filler migration. Be so fucking for real.

Fillers are more able to properly give you definition relative to your face, while implants are unpredictable.

Oh you happen to have slight migration after 6 or 7 years, someone does it wrong, luckily they don’t have to cut up your face again, you just get a filler dissolver
Glad to see people on here trusting fillers again. Implants take maintenance too so the idea of fillers being expensive in the long term is stupid. If you do it DIY, its a few hundred dollars a year which is pretty cheap imo. Good post
 
  • +1
Reactions: CookieGuy
Glad to see people on here trusting fillers again. Implants take maintenance too so the idea of fillers being expensive in the long term is stupid. If you do it DIY, its a few hundred dollars a year which is pretty cheap imo. Good post
Fr who tellin the greys that implants mog 💀 they just puff up your face
 
  • +1
Reactions: exvh
Fr who tellin the greys that implants mog 💀 they just puff up your face
Cant really say grey cuz im a grey too but most people on here seem to ignore the infection rates from implants and mentally masturbate thinking they can save up thousands of dollars to do surgeries in some shithole
 
  • +1
Reactions: pslfinalboss
again caha is not ha, doesn't migrate and either way ha or caha in the jaw adds strong bone structure, doesn't migrate and lasts for ages

this is just normies being fukking cucks - watch all the celeb videos from lorry hill etc. and you can see they've all had loads of work done including fillers and they look better - kpop does it too.

they used to say omg they look terrible - it's all the botox. botox has nothing to do with this, it's temporary muscle paralysis which is amazing for wrinkle prevention. fucking cucks.

i know these aren't dudes, but just run of the mill whores, but


this bitch is like 40-42.

and this bitch is mid 30s:


and they both look great, loads of filler, some plastic, fake tits. they'd look fucking mid without it. although the first bitch had fat grafting under eyes in late 30s but used to and still does ha filler.

yes, some implants do look good, but when you're botched you're botched - look at zac efron.
filler face is the result of not getting it dissolved, where you've done ha repeatedly over the years because it looked good the first time and you kept chasing the same result, when it never fully got absorbed, migrated and when you were doing it in the cheeks and lips because you're a woman and that's where they fucking like it.
 
I see this forum won’t stop falling for the Propoganda of implants being better and filler migration. Be so fucking for real.

Fillers are more able to properly give you definition relative to your face, while implants are unpredictable.

Oh you happen to have slight migration after 6 or 7 years, someone does it wrong, luckily they don’t have to cut up your face again, you just get a filler dissolver
fillers and implants are both great

implants are better for certain areas and filler are better for other areas

its kinda personal preference but i would rather a one time payment and be done then dissolving every 2 years and getting filler

im going to get filler short term and implants after
 
I don't get the people saying that fillers being temporary is a negative, I'd say it's neither negative nor positive. It's bad if you your clinician did good, it's good if they did bad.
 
Filler are not cope
 
  • +1
Reactions: CookieGuy
I don't get the people saying that fillers being temporary is a negative, I'd say it's neither negative nor positive. It's bad if you your clinician did good, it's good if they did bad.
If they did bad use dissolvers. If they did good go to that clinic again the next year
 
  • +1
Reactions: o_Owtf
I am getting implants, but probably will need some filler to actually get nice contours.
 
  • Woah
Reactions: CookieGuy
I am getting implants, but probably will need some filler to actually get nice contours.
Implants are only worth it if you look like a recessed pizza slice
 
Implants are only worth it if you look like a recessed pizza slice
I am probably just getting some hydroxyapetite on my zygos. I have zero forward growth on my zygos. could get peek implants, but 3-4 times the price with not a massive difference in results. need masseter botox too.
 
Depends what types of fillers
 
especially for jaw and chin, they don't migrate much, its the cheeks and undereyes, which migrate the most.
 
fillers and implants are both great

implants are better for certain areas and filler are better for other areas

its kinda personal preference but i would rather a one time payment and be done then dissolving every 2 years and getting filler

im going to get filler short term and implants after
Implants will lead to dehiscence. Avoid implants unless you have a very narrow subhuman jaw. Filler is enough in most cases and will look more natural than implants will
 
Implants will lead to dehiscence. Avoid implants unless you have a very narrow subhuman jaw. Filler is enough in most cases and will look more natural than implants will
dehiscence is not that common

well, depending on the implant

filler is enough yes, but id rather make a one time payment and be over with it

rather than dissolving yearly yk?

but imma use filler instead of implants cuz i dont really need implants anyway (Well i do, but i dont wanna do too much)
 
dehiscence is not that common

well, depending on the implant

filler is enough yes, but id rather make a one time payment and be over with it

rather than dissolving yearly yk?

but imma use filler instead of implants cuz i dont really need implants anyway (Well i do, but i dont wanna do too much)
Don’t jaw fillers only need touching up every 2 years? Every 2 years isn’t that bad.

I see the appeal in getting it done with in one surgery but with jaw implants you risk uncanny results. There aren’t many good jaw implant results out there and all jaw filler results mog the good results anyway.
 
  • +1
Reactions: idont
Don’t jaw fillers only need touching up every 2 years? Every 2 years isn’t that bad.

I see the appeal in getting it done with in one surgery but with jaw implants you risk uncanny results. There aren’t many good jaw implant results out there and all jaw filler results mog the good results anyway.
inframalar implants mog anything around that region that can be done with filler

and yes mandible condyle filler is very long lasting so yes 2 years probs
and supra filler is pretty mog, i saw a clinic with an average of 2 years lasting, i would still dissolve early for both to minimise risk

and i mean tbh u can say cope but bgm looks a lil uncanny imo
 
Filler saved my life
 
inframalar implants mog anything around that region that can be done with filler

and yes mandible condyle filler is very long lasting so yes 2 years probs
and supra filler is pretty mog, i saw a clinic with an average of 2 years lasting, i would still dissolve early for both to minimise risk

and i mean tbh u can say cope but bgm looks a lil uncanny imo
Yeah infra implants mog and I’m gonna be getting them myself.

Not sure about supra filler tbh, the most I will get is supra fat grafts which I plan on doing in 2-3 years time along with cantho + lower eyelid retraction.

BGM gets too much filler around the jaw which is why he looks slightly uncanny. But tbh in real life it probably looks mogger
 
  • +1
Reactions: idont
Yeah infra implants mog and I’m gonna be getting them myself.

Not sure about supra filler tbh, the most I will get is supra fat grafts which I plan on doing in 2-3 years time along with cantho + lower eyelid retraction.

BGM gets too much filler around the jaw which is why he looks slightly uncanny. But tbh in real life it probably looks mogger
supra filler is decent for short term

im getting fat graft tho
only bother is getting up to 22 percent bf for the damn surgery
 
  • +1
Reactions: BronzeSpartan2
I see this forum won’t stop falling for the Propoganda of implants being better and filler migration. Be so fucking for real.

Fillers are more able to properly give you definition relative to your face, while implants are unpredictable.

Oh you happen to have slight migration after 6 or 7 years, someone does it wrong, luckily they don’t have to cut up your face again, you just get a filler dissolver
Jaw alignment surgery, proper ortho, basically in order to get a good jaw one doesn’t really actually need implants in majority of cases. And for actual facial features, fillers are usually superior, except an exception might be areas close around the eye. I think safety profile with those is better with implants then filler
 

Similar threads

elim.doc
Replies
60
Views
1K
AuraLead
AuraLead
Tigermoggerlol
Replies
43
Views
326
elim.doc
elim.doc
D
Replies
13
Views
223
CkldPsycho
CkldPsycho
A
Looksmax Bonesmashing
Replies
7
Views
247
Deleted member 134854
D

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top