Seth Walsh
The man in the mirror is my only threat
Contributor
- Joined
- Jan 12, 2020
- Posts
- 8,672
- Reputation
- 16,611
Norm‑breaking = violating the unwritten codes (speech, dress, manners, political stances) that signal membership in a status group. Sanctions: gossip, exclusion, blocked opportunities.
Why upper classes police norms
Political expression
Result: Norm adherence functions as a self‑reinforcing security system for status, wealth, and power.
Why upper classes police norms
- Asset defense Reputation underwrites access to elite schools, jobs, boards, and credit. A single breach can freeze capital flows.
- Network insurance High‑value networks are trust webs. Deviants look unpredictable, so peers close ranks and cut ties.
- Gatekeeping advantage Dense, opaque etiquette keeps outsiders guessing; sticking to it preserves the entry barrier.
- Intergenerational continuity Wealth built over centuries relies on heirs copying ancestral scripts; idiosyncrasy risks dilution or legal disputes.
- Regulatory shelter Conforming elites appear “responsible,” attracting lighter scrutiny and protecting favorable laws.
- Risk arithmetic Upside of rebellion is low (they already sit atop), downside is high (public scandal, market loss). Expected‑value logic favors caution.
Political expression
- Surface centrism Radical positions threaten market stability; elites adopt moderate rhetoric even when privately funding influence campaigns.
- Coded progressivism Support symbolic causes (arts, climate galas) that enhance moral capital without endangering core assets.
- Quiet conservatism Defend property rights, inheritance, and low taxation through lobby groups rather than public agitation.
Result: Norm adherence functions as a self‑reinforcing security system for status, wealth, and power.
