ranierean
法轮大法好
- Joined
- Jul 1, 2023
- Posts
- 3,407
- Reputation
- 6,324
I can understand being aversive of women if you already get enough external validation as is or do not require it to begin with, but most of you guys seem to fall into the trap of reverse engineering female desire without any female input. The best (or worst) example of it is the incessant "muh BBC" and "muh Kpopmaxx" spam which is fun, I suppose, but only if you don't take it seriously.
Of course, there's a big gap between what women say and want, but even that can be useful since you still need to know about what is socially acceptable to profess.
Also, I would genuinely like to hear people who would balk at this but then also defend keeping trucels here, just as an example. If women are inherently bad and unproductive for PSL thought then how do you even tolerate people who never had a life?
This also applies to the simp question. If women registering is guaranteed to be disruptive because every single incel will revert to the natural state of a horny online Indian then doesn't that invalidate the userbase itself in retrospect? Why do you listen to guys whose entire e-presence can be debased by a female-presenting poster in their vicinity?
Of course, there's a big gap between what women say and want, but even that can be useful since you still need to know about what is socially acceptable to profess.
Also, I would genuinely like to hear people who would balk at this but then also defend keeping trucels here, just as an example. If women are inherently bad and unproductive for PSL thought then how do you even tolerate people who never had a life?
This also applies to the simp question. If women registering is guaranteed to be disruptive because every single incel will revert to the natural state of a horny online Indian then doesn't that invalidate the userbase itself in retrospect? Why do you listen to guys whose entire e-presence can be debased by a female-presenting poster in their vicinity?