illusion
Iron
- Joined
- Jun 1, 2024
- Posts
- 200
- Reputation
- 266
In almost every partner, there is a triad of features that are universally desired, those being: Dick Size, Height, Face
Believe it or not, the most expendable out of those three features is the face, every person will have a different preference for a face (however there are people that are considered to be universally attractive. Ex: Henry Cavill)
So why specifically dick, face, and height? Why not things like muscles, tattoos, aesthetics, skin tone, even money? Well simply because there is no one size fits all for being attractive, everyone will fit into a different category.
For example, tattoos and muscles are seen as a high appeal trait in men, but out of the two people below, who would fit into that aesthetic better?
Obviously the logical answer would be that Jeremy Meeks (right) would fit better into the tattooed and muscular aesthetic than Bjorn Andresen (left.) The comparison is stupid and that's exactly the point, these are two very different looking people who fit into different categories, neither would have any success in trying to mimic the other's archetype. (e.g. Jeremy Meeks would not be able to fit into the pretty boy archetype and Bjorn Andresen wouldn't fit into the Dom archetype)
When a person meets a new potential partner, there is a subconscious three step verification process that determines how successful the relationship is going to be just based on physical attributes, the process goes as followed: Person is noticed for their height -> then their face is taken into account (height and face are interchangeable in this process depending on the person and situation) -> then to finalize the process, the dick size is also taken into account. (This usually happens later on as the relationship progresses although it's usually discussed beforehand, and in some situations it's found out immediately. Ex: Having sex on the first date or a one night stand.) This subconscious process decides whether or not something is going to be left desired in the relationship - Say for example a person has both height and face but their penis doesn't fit the standards of their potential partner, that is going to leave something desired in the relationship, which may possibly affect the lastingness of the relationship, or in some cases whether or not it begins at all.
In the most ideal scenario, all three of your important features (height, dick, and face) leave nothing to be desired for, which would ensure the highest amount of appeal for your potential partner and the highest chance the relationship itself succeeds just based on the physical attributes. Obviously you will also have to be a decent and likable person, do not expect the most high quality results if you act like a rabid dog with people, which is also why it is important to be NT. However, unlike the triad of physical features, there is no one desired personality, every person will want a different personality for their ideal partner, and unlike face, there is almost no universally attractive personality that would be ideal for everyone.
There is also one more attribute that is usually regarded as sometimes being even more important than any physical feature, that is money. Money, while being one of the most important things in life and what can make or break the quality of your life, is also unfortunately cope if you want a genuine high quality relationship. Since money is a feature that exists outside of the human body, being nothing more than a very convenient non-permanent accessory, people you attract with money won't be attracted to you but your accessory, that being money. Many people on this forum would disagree and say that they are only after sex but this opinion will change the second any of them feel the genuine love that a high quality relationship brings, it's like a drug that you can never stop chasing.
For example, which one of the two people below do you think would have a higher chance of getting into a high quality relationship with a high quality partner?
1.
Jeffrey, billionaire, has none of the features in the triad I mentioned (face, dick, height,) relies solely on money to get into relationships.
2.
Liam, an average 9-5 worker, has all of the features in the triad I mentioned (face, dick, height,) is pretty average financially.
Obviously, the logical answer would be Liam, who would get into relationships with people that are attracted to him, not an accessory. Money, unlike any physical attribute, is not specific to any person, anyone could have money, which makes it unvaluable in genuine relationships where you would want the person to be attracted to you. Since there is only one of every person, the uniqueness the physical attributes bring to someone would make them more worthwhile in the long run. However it is still an important feature in life, it's not unimportant in any way.
Everything else is cope however, there is no one way to get higher appeal and no way to improve attractiveness, it all depends on the person and what category they fit into and even then sometimes the said methods of supposedly increasing appeal and attractiveness might not work. All 3 of the things in the triad (height, face, and dick) are determined when you are born, and while they aren't fully alterable, it is up to you to improve them to the best of your capabilities no matter what, to ensure the most out of all future relationships, partners, and even life and happiness in general.
This thread should be water, however there are too many people that believe there is superiority in one over the other. (For example, some people believe that face > height or the other way around, and there are some people that believe dick > face and height.) However this is completely wrong, in fact all three of these things can make or break your appeal and attractiveness. Someone who is tall and has a big penis may have their appeal dragged through the mud due to them not having a good face card, and it can happen in any order or in any way depending on the person and their preferences. Humans can never achieve perfection but to ensure the highest quality of life, taking yourself as close as possible is ideal.
Believe it or not, the most expendable out of those three features is the face, every person will have a different preference for a face (however there are people that are considered to be universally attractive. Ex: Henry Cavill)
So why specifically dick, face, and height? Why not things like muscles, tattoos, aesthetics, skin tone, even money? Well simply because there is no one size fits all for being attractive, everyone will fit into a different category.
For example, tattoos and muscles are seen as a high appeal trait in men, but out of the two people below, who would fit into that aesthetic better?
Obviously the logical answer would be that Jeremy Meeks (right) would fit better into the tattooed and muscular aesthetic than Bjorn Andresen (left.) The comparison is stupid and that's exactly the point, these are two very different looking people who fit into different categories, neither would have any success in trying to mimic the other's archetype. (e.g. Jeremy Meeks would not be able to fit into the pretty boy archetype and Bjorn Andresen wouldn't fit into the Dom archetype)
When a person meets a new potential partner, there is a subconscious three step verification process that determines how successful the relationship is going to be just based on physical attributes, the process goes as followed: Person is noticed for their height -> then their face is taken into account (height and face are interchangeable in this process depending on the person and situation) -> then to finalize the process, the dick size is also taken into account. (This usually happens later on as the relationship progresses although it's usually discussed beforehand, and in some situations it's found out immediately. Ex: Having sex on the first date or a one night stand.) This subconscious process decides whether or not something is going to be left desired in the relationship - Say for example a person has both height and face but their penis doesn't fit the standards of their potential partner, that is going to leave something desired in the relationship, which may possibly affect the lastingness of the relationship, or in some cases whether or not it begins at all.
In the most ideal scenario, all three of your important features (height, dick, and face) leave nothing to be desired for, which would ensure the highest amount of appeal for your potential partner and the highest chance the relationship itself succeeds just based on the physical attributes. Obviously you will also have to be a decent and likable person, do not expect the most high quality results if you act like a rabid dog with people, which is also why it is important to be NT. However, unlike the triad of physical features, there is no one desired personality, every person will want a different personality for their ideal partner, and unlike face, there is almost no universally attractive personality that would be ideal for everyone.
There is also one more attribute that is usually regarded as sometimes being even more important than any physical feature, that is money. Money, while being one of the most important things in life and what can make or break the quality of your life, is also unfortunately cope if you want a genuine high quality relationship. Since money is a feature that exists outside of the human body, being nothing more than a very convenient non-permanent accessory, people you attract with money won't be attracted to you but your accessory, that being money. Many people on this forum would disagree and say that they are only after sex but this opinion will change the second any of them feel the genuine love that a high quality relationship brings, it's like a drug that you can never stop chasing.
For example, which one of the two people below do you think would have a higher chance of getting into a high quality relationship with a high quality partner?
1.
Jeffrey, billionaire, has none of the features in the triad I mentioned (face, dick, height,) relies solely on money to get into relationships.
2.
Liam, an average 9-5 worker, has all of the features in the triad I mentioned (face, dick, height,) is pretty average financially.
Obviously, the logical answer would be Liam, who would get into relationships with people that are attracted to him, not an accessory. Money, unlike any physical attribute, is not specific to any person, anyone could have money, which makes it unvaluable in genuine relationships where you would want the person to be attracted to you. Since there is only one of every person, the uniqueness the physical attributes bring to someone would make them more worthwhile in the long run. However it is still an important feature in life, it's not unimportant in any way.
Everything else is cope however, there is no one way to get higher appeal and no way to improve attractiveness, it all depends on the person and what category they fit into and even then sometimes the said methods of supposedly increasing appeal and attractiveness might not work. All 3 of the things in the triad (height, face, and dick) are determined when you are born, and while they aren't fully alterable, it is up to you to improve them to the best of your capabilities no matter what, to ensure the most out of all future relationships, partners, and even life and happiness in general.
This thread should be water, however there are too many people that believe there is superiority in one over the other. (For example, some people believe that face > height or the other way around, and there are some people that believe dick > face and height.) However this is completely wrong, in fact all three of these things can make or break your appeal and attractiveness. Someone who is tall and has a big penis may have their appeal dragged through the mud due to them not having a good face card, and it can happen in any order or in any way depending on the person and their preferences. Humans can never achieve perfection but to ensure the highest quality of life, taking yourself as close as possible is ideal.
