Number of members in this forum is fake (master is a fraudmaxxer)

[Dr. Mog]

I’ve kept count on the latest member joins of the forum in the past 24hrs , max it was 4-5 per day. For the benefit of the doubt let’s keep it at 5 and let’s say this same number continued till the birth of .org. If you do the math that only accounts to 12.7k members and the listed members here is 94k

This reminds me of the number 271k after the claimed number was 6 million by (((them))).

 

[miloeatscookies]

2023 had so many joins bro cuz of fuckass sapphire making this forum popular

 

[asdvek]

There is apparently 60-80k users or whatever (CBA to look for the actual number rn) but there's maybe 200 active users

It's just like world's population. They say there's 8 billion people but there's maybe 100 million people at best.

All a psyop.

 

[Deleted member 153834]

I’ve kept count on the latest member joins of the forum in the past 24hrs , max it was 4-5 per day. For the benefit of the doubt let’s keep it at 5 and let’s say this same number continued till the birth of .org. If you do the math that only accounts to 12.7k members and the listed members here is 94k

This reminds me of the number 271k after the claimed number was 6 million by (((them))).

>get 24h worth of data
>extrapolate ALL sign-ups 6 years back
EXTREMELY high iq.
@Jason Voorhees

 

[Dr. Mog]

>get 24h worth of data
>extrapolate ALL sign-ups 6 years back
EXTREMELY high iq.
@Jason Voorhees

> I’ve roughly seen this since a week.
> This forum is getting more popular as we speak so it’s statistically reasonable to assume the new joins keep on increasing daily and metaphorically speaking today’s number is more than yesterday.
>Your username checks out, GrAY retard.

 

[Deleted member 153834]

> I’ve roughly seen this since a week.
> This forum is getting more popular as we speak so it’s statistically reasonable to assume the new joins keep on increasing daily and metaphorically speaking today’s number is more than yesterday.
>Your username checks out, GrAY retard.

oh yea, so you're extrapolating back 6 years from a week of data instead of a single day, accept my apologies. also, nigga you didn't use statistically and metaphorically in the same sentence xdddd.
>so it’s statistically reasonable to assume the new joins keep on increasing daily and metaphorically speaking today’s number is more than yesterday.
so you're saying the sign-ups are monotonically increasing over time? in that case you'd wanna use less than 5 even with your retarded extrapolation method no?

 

[Deleted member 153834]

> I’ve roughly seen this since a week.
> This forum is getting more popular as we speak so it’s statistically reasonable to assume the new joins keep on increasing daily and metaphorically speaking today’s number is more than yesterday.
>Your username checks out, GrAY retard.

D - dick
r - riding
. - .
M-mega
O-omega
G-nigger

 

[Dr. Mog]

D - dick
r - riding
. - .
M-mega
O-omega
G-nigger

 

[Deleted member 153834]

View attachment 4244732

 

[Dr. Mog]

that case you'd wanna use less than 5 even with your retarded extrapolation method no?

If anything using a figure lower than five would only strengthen my argument, since it’d pull the average join rate down even further. That’s precisely why, for the sake of fairness, I said let’s assume five per day in the OP.

 

[Torycel]

I’ve kept count on the latest member joins of the forum in the past 24hrs , max it was 4-5 per day. For the benefit of the doubt let’s keep it at 5 and let’s say this same number continued till the birth of .org. If you do the math that only accounts to 12.7k members and the listed members here is 94k

This reminds me of the number 271k after the claimed number was 6 million by (((them))).

also com no way there are 50 k ppl over there

 

[lifeless]

every 3 accounts unironically accounts for a 1 person just because theres as bagillion alts