"Objective signaling" reveals a man’s value and makes women instinctively pick him out from a room of ten

[johnny4612]

Imagine there are ten men in a room. We all know some will be richer, more confident, better looking, or more socially connected. Some might have women chasing them, others have none. But here’s the thing: nobody in that room explicitly knows who’s who.

And yet… women often do. So the question is: what signals do women actually pick up on to decide which man seems “the best” or "a good pick"?

Beyond money or status, there are subtle cues, presence, for example: how a man walks, talks, and holds his space. Then there’s vitality: the natural energy, youth, and liveliness that shows in his tone, eyes, and expressions.

I used to think it was all about height. But over time, I’ve seen shorter men dominate a room, projecting more authority and power than taller ones.
There are behavioral patterns that objectively attract women, regardless of individual preference.
Not the “subjective” stuff, like body type, face shape, or personal taste, but signals that universally register as attractive or high-value.


For example, when we talk about what women we find attractive, we can separate it clearly:
Objective factors (universal): feminine energy, how she moves, how attentively she listens, low-drama attitude, emotional stability.
Subjective factors (personal taste): body shape, height, certain features, etc.

Even if a woman doesn’t fit a man’s subjective type, if she displays the objective traits, he’ll still feel drawn in.
That is happened to me, and it's happened to you too for sure.
You knowyou're drawn to thin women, but for some reason, that chubby woman there is a magnet for you. She owns the objective traits.

So it stands to reason the same logic applies in reverse. There are objective signals men can project that affect all women on a primal level, regardless of her type or preference.


What do you think those signals are (that women specifically read as objective)?
Let’s try to isolate the objective factors.
We can teach men to focus on developing what’s worth fighting for.

 

[harmonytingfam]

We know there are 10 men in a room. What signals do women pick up on to decide which one seems “the best”?


There are other factors, like:

• Presence: how he walks, talks, and carries himself.
• Vitality: the perceived youth and energy in his expressions.

All of this affects whether a man is seen as powerful or just a “nice guy.” Money is power, sure, but in a room full of 10 men, it doesn’t show right away. You don't know which have, which don't.


I used to think it was all about height, but Its not accurate. Many shorter man still dominate the room and project more power than taller, bigger ones.

There are factors that project that a man has money, power, etc., in short, all the qualities that would make him stand out from others.
And in this room, they are in his appearance, not in his bank account or his social proof.

yeah nice gpt thread faggot

 

[johnny4612]

yeah nice gpt thread faggot

When posts with the serious tag appear, does that mean there are still users who log in and comment in this way?
I haven't used gpt, just so you know.

 

[harmonytingfam]

When posts with the serious tag appear, does that mean there are still users who log in and comment in this way?
I haven't used gpt, just so you know.

did you use faggot ai?

also no short man is dominating a room when there's tall men involved

 

[TheTD7]

We know there are 10 men in a room.

is this what you think about, johnny4612?

 

[SubhumanYuki]

We know there are 10 men in a room. What signals do women pick up on to decide which one seems “the best”?


There are other factors, like:

• Presence: how he walks, talks, and carries himself.
• Vitality: the perceived youth and energy in his expressions.

All of this affects whether a man is seen as powerful or just a “nice guy.” Money is power, sure, but in a room full of 10 men, it doesn’t show right away. You don't know which have, which don't.


I used to think it was all about height, but Its not accurate. Many shorter man still dominate the room and project more power than taller, bigger ones.

There are factors that project that a man has money, power, etc., in short, all the qualities that would make him stand out from others.
And in this room, they are in his appearance, not in his bank account or his social proof.

Height

 

[TopTierIncel42]

gpt slop. Nigga had to use ai to state bullshit

 

[ENAHGY]

Imagine there are ten men in a room. We all know some will be richer, more confident, better looking, or more socially connected. Some might have women chasing them, others have none. But here’s the thing: nobody in that room explicitly knows who’s who.

And yet… women often do. So the question is: what signals do women actually pick up on to decide which man seems “the best” or "a good pick"?

Beyond money or status, there are subtle cues, presence, for example: how a man walks, talks, and holds his space. Then there’s vitality: the natural energy, youth, and liveliness that shows in his tone, eyes, and expressions.

I used to think it was all about height. But over time, I’ve seen shorter men dominate a room, projecting more authority and power than taller ones.
There are behavioral patterns that objectively attract women, regardless of individual preference.
Not the “subjective” stuff, like body type, face shape, or personal taste, but signals that universally register as attractive or high-value.


For example, when we talk about what women we find attractive, we can separate it clearly:
Objective factors (universal): feminine energy, how she moves, how attentively she listens, low-drama attitude, emotional stability.
Subjective factors (personal taste): body shape, height, certain features, etc.

Even if a woman doesn’t fit a man’s subjective type, if she displays the objective traits, he’ll still feel drawn in.
That is happened to me, and it's happened to you too for sure.
You knowyou're drawn to thin women, but for some reason, that chubby woman there is a magnet for you. She owns the objective traits.

So it stands to reason the same logic applies in reverse. There are objective signals men can project that affect all women on a primal level, regardless of her type or preference.


What do you think those signals are (that women specifically read as objective)?
Let’s try to isolate the objective factors.
We can teach men to focus on developing what’s worth fighting for.

I think height is a large one but I agree that there might be some other small factors. One is just overall size and how you position yourself in a room. People with shrivelled posture in corners or edges will always appear less confident that people who stand/sit tall and proud in the middle of the room. I suppose most signals are subjective or depend on your body. So heigh is important but so is frame. Don't take this for sure however as this is what I believe and I haven't done any external research before posting this