Dxniell
Iron
- Joined
- Dec 23, 2025
- Posts
- 22
- Reputation
- 11
Today I would like to talk about GLP-1 medications and the chance of pancreatitis when taking the medication.
Nobody in the looksmaxxing scene talks about it and nobody has mentioned it in this forum, so I wanted to share it with you. Here are some study results regarding the use of GLP-1 medications:
1.Study:
2.Study:
3.Study:
4.Study:
When you look at all four major meta-analyses together that is, data from dozens of randomized studies with tens of thousands of people a very clear picture emerges:
So why does pancreatitis even appear in the package insert?
Because:
in the real world, some people who take GLP-1 drugs get pancreatitis.
But here is the key point:
People with obesity, diabetes, high triglycerides, and gallstones already have a much higher baseline risk of pancreatitis, even if they never touch GLP-1 drugs.
So when millions of people take these medications, some pancreatitis cases will happen by coincidence.
That is called correlation, not causation.
Regulators therefore require that it be mentioned but that does NOT mean the drug is actually causing it at a higher rate.
The scientific question is:
And the answer from controlled trials is:
If GLP-1 drugs were truly damaging the pancreas, these massive trials would clearly show it. They do not, and there exist more studys about GLP-1 Agonists.
I'm too lazy to report on this study as well, so here's a link to a study with 1,532,513 participants: https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamainternalmedicine/fullarticle/2540537
and Bloodworks alone do not protect against pancreatitis:
I am not a doctor, I am only speaking from a scientific perspective.
If you have any questions about this illness, please consult a doctor.
If you're reading this, have a nice day and stay safe.
Nobody in the looksmaxxing scene talks about it and nobody has mentioned it in this forum, so I wanted to share it with you. Here are some study results regarding the use of GLP-1 medications:
1.Study:
Meta-analysis of 21 randomized, placebo-controlled semaglutide trials (34,721 patients).
Finding: Semaglutide did not increase the risk of acute pancreatitis compared to control.
Finding: Semaglutide did not increase the risk of acute pancreatitis compared to control.
- Odds Ratio (OR): 0.7 (95% CI 0.5–1.2) — not statistically significant.
- Subgroup analyses by route/dose showed similar results. PubMed
- Participants: 18,700 total.
2.Study:
Systematic review of high-quality, long-term randomized placebo-controlled trials of GLP-1 receptor agonists (including semaglutide).
Finding:
Finding:
- Treatment with GLP-1RAs was not associated with increased risk of acute pancreatitis vs. placebo.
- Odds Ratio (OR): 0.745 (95% CI: 0.47–1.17), no statistically significant increase. PubMed
- Participants: 34,721 total.
3.Study:
Meta-analysis of 43 randomized trials of GLP-1RAs (semaglutide + other agents).
Finding:
Finding:
- No statistically significant association between GLP-1RA use and pancreatitis.
- Mantel-Haenszel OR: 1.24 (95% CI: 0.94–1.64, P=0.13) — not significant.
- Also no clear pancreatic cancer increase (data too scarce). PubMed
- Participants: over 50,000.
4.Study:
Meta-analysis of older RCTs with multiple GLP-1RA drugs including semaglutide.
Finding: No difference in pancreatitis rates between GLP-1RAs and comparators.
Finding: No difference in pancreatitis rates between GLP-1RAs and comparators.
- Mantel-Haenszel OR: 0.93 (95% CI: 0.65–1.34) — not significant. PubMed
- 113 RCTs fulfilled inclusion criteria.
- 13 reported no data on pancreatitis.
- 72 reported no events of pancreatitis in any treatment group.
When you look at all four major meta-analyses together that is, data from dozens of randomized studies with tens of thousands of people a very clear picture emerges:
GLP-1 drugs do not increase the risk of developing true, medically relevant pancreatitis.
So why does pancreatitis even appear in the package insert?
Because:
in the real world, some people who take GLP-1 drugs get pancreatitis.
But here is the key point:
People with obesity, diabetes, high triglycerides, and gallstones already have a much higher baseline risk of pancreatitis, even if they never touch GLP-1 drugs.
So when millions of people take these medications, some pancreatitis cases will happen by coincidence.
That is called correlation, not causation.
Regulators therefore require that it be mentioned but that does NOT mean the drug is actually causing it at a higher rate.
The scientific question is:
Does pancreatitis happen more often on GLP-1 drugs than without them?
And the answer from controlled trials is:
If GLP-1 drugs were truly damaging the pancreas, these massive trials would clearly show it. They do not, and there exist more studys about GLP-1 Agonists.
I'm too lazy to report on this study as well, so here's a link to a study with 1,532,513 participants: https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamainternalmedicine/fullarticle/2540537
and Bloodworks alone do not protect against pancreatitis:
- The standard tests for the pancreas are amylase and lipase.
- These enzymes only increase once pancreatitis has already begun.
- Regular measurement only reveals that something is already happening it does not prevent it from happening.
I am not a doctor, I am only speaking from a scientific perspective.
If you have any questions about this illness, please consult a doctor.
If you're reading this, have a nice day and stay safe.