People here overestimate number of LTN and underestimate number of HTN+

[asian_ascender]

Subhuman is -2 standard deviations below median. 1 & 2 PSL (bottom 2%)

LTN is -1 std dev. 3 PSL (2-16th percentile)

MTN is median. 4 PSL (16-84th percentile)

HTN is +1 std dev. 5 PSL (84th-98th percentile)

CL is +2 std dev. 6 PSL (top 2%)

Chad is +3 std dev. 7 PSL (top 0.1%) 1 in 1000

So most people are actually MTN. Could be low MTN or high MTN but still 68% of the population is considered MTN. This retarded forum thinks half the world is LTN for some reason when in fact it is only 14% of the population. Most LTNs rated here should be considered low MTN or even mid MTN.

HTN+ are in fact not that rare (16% of population). This means 1 in every 6 people u see in public around you is HTN+. Some MTN rated here are in fact high MTN even HTN.

CL are also not that uncommon (2% of population), meaning that if you take a stroll in an urban city area, it’s likely you would encounter at least 1 or 2 CL. Chads are the real rarity at 1 in 1000 people and there’s perhaps maybe only 1 in your entire school or town. Most people do not know chads irl.

I believe looks is centrally normally distributed. Some people think that looks is right skewed (image below), leading them to conclude that there exist way more sub MTN than MTN+ when in fact it’s the same.

Right skewed distribution

Central normal distribution

I have a reason to argue that looks is centrally normal distributed. This is because genetic traits (looks, height, iq etc) tends to the mean throughout generations (google reversion to the mean). That’s unlike traditional right skewed distributions like income where the rich generally get richer and poor remain poor. Genetically blessed parents do not guarantee good looking children (look at Herman Drago and Alain Delon sons, nowhere near their looks).

 

[Mainlander]

Im LTN

 

[asian_ascender]

Im LTN

If u look around and see that you are indeed the bottom 16% of the male population then yes unfortunately you are LTN. If not probably low MTN

 

[PUNK1986]

Subhuman is -2 standard deviations below median. 1 & 2 PSL (bottom 2%)

LTN is -1 std dev. 3 PSL (2-16th percentile)

MTN is median. 4 PSL (16-84th percentile)

HTN is +1 std dev. 5 PSL (84th-98th percentile)

CL is +2 std dev. 6 PSL (top 2%)

Chad is +3 std dev. 7 PSL (top 0.1%) 1 in 1000

So most people are actually MTN. Could be low MTN or high MTN but still 68% of the population is considered MTN. This retarded forum thinks half the world is LTN for some reason when in fact it is only 14% of the population. Most LTNs rated here should be considered low MTN or even mid MTN.

HTN+ are in fact not that rare (16% of population). This means 1 in every 6 people u see in public around you is HTN+. Some MTN rated here are in fact high MTN even HTN.

CL are also not that uncommon (2% of population), meaning that if you take a stroll in an urban city area, it’s likely you would encounter at least 1 or 2 CL. Chads are the real rarity at 1 in 1000 people and there’s perhaps maybe only 1 in your entire school or town. Most people do not know chads irl.

I believe looks is centrally normally distributed. Some people think that looks is right skewed (image below), leading them to conclude that there exist way more sub MTN than MTN+ when in fact it’s the same.

View attachment 3820432
Right skewed distribution

View attachment 3820438
Central normal distribution

I have a reason to argue that looks is centrally normal distributed. This is because genetic traits (looks, height, iq etc) tends to the mean throughout generations (google reversion to the mean). That’s unlike traditional right skewed distributions like income where the rich generally get richer and poor remain poor. Genetically blessed parents do not guarantee good looking children (look at Herman Drago and Alain Delon sons, nowhere near their looks).

Not everyone lives in a good place where the average is mid mtn. I live in a shithole where most guys are ugly. The average guy here is either low ltn or mid ltn, there are way more subhumans and ltns here than there are htns

 

[ihatefoids87]

Subhuman is -2 standard deviations below median. 1 & 2 PSL (bottom 2%)

LTN is -1 std dev. 3 PSL (2-16th percentile)

MTN is median. 4 PSL (16-84th percentile)

HTN is +1 std dev. 5 PSL (84th-98th percentile)

CL is +2 std dev. 6 PSL (top 2%)

Chad is +3 std dev. 7 PSL (top 0.1%) 1 in 1000

So most people are actually MTN. Could be low MTN or high MTN but still 68% of the population is considered MTN. This retarded forum thinks half the world is LTN for some reason when in fact it is only 14% of the population. Most LTNs rated here should be considered low MTN or even mid MTN.

HTN+ are in fact not that rare (16% of population). This means 1 in every 6 people u see in public around you is HTN+. Some MTN rated here are in fact high MTN even HTN.

CL are also not that uncommon (2% of population), meaning that if you take a stroll in an urban city area, it’s likely you would encounter at least 1 or 2 CL. Chads are the real rarity at 1 in 1000 people and there’s perhaps maybe only 1 in your entire school or town. Most people do not know chads irl.

I believe looks is centrally normally distributed. Some people think that looks is right skewed (image below), leading them to conclude that there exist way more sub MTN than MTN+ when in fact it’s the same.

View attachment 3820432
Right skewed distribution

View attachment 3820438
Central normal distribution

I have a reason to argue that looks is centrally normal distributed. This is because genetic traits (looks, height, iq etc) tends to the mean throughout generations (google reversion to the mean). That’s unlike traditional right skewed distributions like income where the rich generally get richer and poor remain poor. Genetically blessed parents do not guarantee good looking children (look at Herman Drago and Alain Delon sons, nowhere near their looks).

It doesn't matter about the actual rating you get it's about how it compares to other people

 

[Restitutor Orbis]

You wrongly assume that looks are normally distrubuted, which is what causes your data to get fucked. I can get on board with the genetic components of looks being normally distributed, but the average person is fat, drinks alcohol and coffee, doesn't do skincare, doesn't workout, has shit hair, etc. That's why a many MTN potential dudes are LTN, and thus why LTNs are more common than MTNs. In fact many MTNs could hit HTN, and are only MTN because they don't max out shit

 

[14Ueber333mensch88]

Im LTN

Dont be sad my boi

We all will acsend to chadlite this summer