People on .co say this is a Chad and Stacy, do you agree?

[Over]

This is a chad :



https://incels.is/attachments/b5d9e31e-4185-4821-a196-578ad1364b4c-jpeg.203321/


this is a normie:



https://incels.is/attachments/7682a23d-1562-48e4-ba98-36effa5bc49a-png.203322/


this is a becky:



https://incels.is/attachments/c43d3eb0-800c-43ea-b28c-6d4de3b0def4-jpeg.203323/


this is a stacy:



https://incels.is/attachments/7b2bf49a-0441-4d09-a297-11db2efc5434-jpeg.203324/

Original thread: https://incels.is/threads/some-people-here-dont-know-what-a-real-chad-looks-like.179429/

People on .co are so bluepilled on looks JFL.
Here is the real blackpill for those retards on .co who dont know how to rate facial development:

• First guy is a high tier normie max. Bad cheekbones, not enough lateral and forward projection. Weak angularity , very soft face. Bad palpebral fissure length, indicates narrow skull. 5PSL - 5.25PSL max.
• Second guy again flat cheekbones, no angularity and cuck eyes. Around a normie level indeed. Around 3.75PSL - 4PSL max.
• First bitch about a Becky indeed. However...
• Second whore is around Becky level too JFL at calling that stacy. She has weak bones and lacks youth. Britney Spears is a recessed subhuman halod by status.

Here is my take on proper rating:

Spoiler

This is a proper Chad made of real bones. Real Chads are extremely rare irl.

This is a proper Stacy also made of strong bones. Look at zygomatic projection and look at how much more youthful and fertile she looks in comparison to that old ugly hag Britney.

 

[rawdogprince]

all of those people can get love and sex. i cant

 

[Aesthetic]

Jfl the ¨Chad¨ is a normie

The ¨normie¨ is a incel

The ¨Becky¨ is a high tier becky

The ¨stacy¨ is normie objectively ( but below average in my personal opinion)

 

[basedcircassian]

thats not a stacy.

 

[Deleted member 4645]

Chadlite at best.

 

[Gazzamogga]

Depends if you go by IRL or PSL standards of 'Chad'. First guy has the Chad pheno and guys that look like him can be seen slaying on college campuses

 

[AbandonShip]

That chad barely crosses the 4 psl mark

 

[Deleted member 2403]

The becky has exactly my eye area wtf. The "chad" is a high tier normie and the rest are correct tbh.

 

[rockndogs]

This chad is that actor from the scooby doo movie that played fred? He looked good there.

 

[Pietrosiek]

Chad mogs me and Hes mogged by my classmate

 

[Over]

the rest are correct tbh.

Ok

 

[Cardiologyscribe]

Over for them

Ok
View attachment 272770

I read yesterday how Britney Spears has a low iq JFL

 

[JMax]

JFL at thinking Britney was below average.

 

[rockndogs]

Depends if you go by IRL or PSL standards of 'Chad'. First guy has the Chad pheno and guys that look like him can be seen slaying on college campuses

i agree.

 

[Deleted member 3593]

To an extent the PSL scale shouldn’t be taken too literally. Some people have bad PSL features but still are considered good looking.

 

[Deleted member 2403]

Ok
View attachment 272770

Still would dick her over and over again without getting bored when she was younger

 

[Deleted member 3381]

yes they all mog me hard fuck them

 

[Gazzamogga]

i agree.

yes bro

 

[rockndogs]

Imagine thinking that their avg basement psler would slay anything compared to a tall jock pheno jfl. People here are delusional sometimes tbh.

 

[AutisticBeaner]

Jfl the ¨Chad¨ is a normie

The ¨normie¨ is a incel

The ¨Becky¨ is a high tier becky

The ¨stacy¨ is normie objectively ( but below average in my personal opinion)

you cant subjectively say she's below average, either she's above or below average. it's factual.

 

[Over]

JFL at thinking Britney was below average.
View attachment 272773View attachment 272774
View attachment 272776

Sexy recessed britney for mr greycel

She always was a subhuman ugly looking bitch

Absolutely shit skull JFL at that

 

[Gazzamogga]

you cant subjectively say she's below average, either she's above or below average. it's factual.

Female aestethics are too subjective to argue about

 

[Over]

you cant subjectively say she's below average, either she's above or below average. it's factual.

She was fucking below average to my standards lmao just look at her for fucks sake. I rather stay a virgin than fuck that.

Female aestethics are too subjective to argue about

Stacy is made of bones doesnt matter. Britney has NCT and dog shit bones.

 

[Alecxiraptor]

Britney at her best. High tier normie, maybe a bit below that

 

[RAITEIII]

Britney spears was madly pretty lol

 

[AutisticBeaner]

Female aestethics are too subjective to argue about

im not talking about female aesthetics im talking about the pure concept of average and whats below and above it

She was fucking below average to my standards lmao just look at her for fucks sake. I rather stay a virgin than fuck that.

Stacy is made of bones doesnt matter. Britney has NCT and dog shit bones.

yea i didnt say she is pretty anyway

 

[Leforrt3000]

Both of your ratings are bad. The two guys are both low 5's on the psl scale. Second guy might even be mid 5's, he has an angular lower third, and he has a semi decent eye area due to the surrounding orbitals (including laterals), even though he lacks browridge forward projection and eye width. He's also got a wide mouth and decent ratios, including a decent hairline. Also relatively low fat facially. Fwhr only matters if it fucks up your ratios, this isnt 2016 anymore.

The people on incels.is are low IQ when it comes to looks and looksmaxxing. They'll call anyone who suits their personal preference and is somewhat above average a Chad.

Also the "becky" looks better than Britney Spears imo. Poor ratings all around

 

[Over]

Both of your ratings are bad. The two guys are both low 5's on the psl scale. Second guy might even be mid 5's, he has an angular lower third, and he has a semi decent eye area due to the surrounding orbitals (including laterals), even though he lacks browridge forward projection and eye width. He's also got a wide mouth and decent ratios, including a decent hairline. Also relatively low fat facially. Fwhr only matters if it fucks up your ratios, this isnt 2016 anymore.

Second guy is barely a 4.5/10. You have little knowledge on how skull grows properly.

His mandible is not angular. His chin is somewhat wide but body of the mandible and gonion is shit. Reason is below.

His eyes are narrow, look at how flat his long midface is. That means everything in his cranium has grown downwards instead of forwards and laterally.

That's the key point in his face. That's why FWHR is so important.

 

[Deleted member 4332]

Don't take Edmund_Kemper seriously. He is notorious for being a dogshit rater on incels.is and is not a representation on how incels.is members rate people. Many of us .co posters have called him out on his dogshit tier rating system.

He is literally a high effort troll trying to make us (.co posters) look bad.

 

[Brandon10]

Their normie example would get shat on by @medialcanthuscel for the abysmal midface length.

 

[Ritalincell]

Jfl the ¨Chad¨ is a normie

The ¨normie¨ is a incel

The ¨Becky¨ is a high tier becky

The ¨stacy¨ is normie objectively ( but below average in my personal opinion)

High tier becky? are you high she looks like a long haired man

 

[Leforrt3000]

Second guy is barely a 4.5/10. You have little knowledge on how skull grows properly.

His mandible is not angular. His chin is somewhat wide but body of the mandible and gonion is shit. Reason is below.

His eyes are narrow, look at how flat his long midface is. That means everything in his cranium has grown downwards instead of forwards and laterally.

That's the key point in his face. That's why FWHR is so important.

Yea the mandible isnt that angular (you're right the gonion is bad) but it has some angularity, tall ramus. He lacks chin width but he has good forward project in the chin which is what fooled me, and its angular as well.

He does lack forward growth but it doesnt affect his face that much because his maxilla and mandible still have some forward projection and the length of his midface doesnt fuck up his ratio because he has a decent height on his lower third. He's doesnt have a kylo ren midface, in fact if his midface was shorter it may lower his attractiveness imo because he'd have less a stretch on his facial fat and it would make him look more neotonous.

The problem with standard downward growth is that it causes a convex face and overly long midface that ruins the proportions, along with recessed lower half of the face. Not the case here.

His narrow face might cause a small ipd which is an issue.

 

[Kingkellz]

JFL at thinking Britney was below average.
View attachment 272773View attachment 272774
View attachment 272776

She is below average
I saw a pic of her without makeup and she looks like a melted potato

 

[Over]

Yea the mandible isnt that angular (you're right the gonion is bad) but it has some angularity, tall ramus. He lacks chin width but he has good forward project in the chin which is what fooled me, and its angular as well.

He does lack forward growth but it doesnt affect his face that much because his maxilla and mandible still have some forward projection and the length of his midface doesnt fuck up his ratio because he has a decent height on his lower third. He's doesnt have a kylo ren midface, in fact if his midface was shorter it may lower his attractiveness imo because he'd have less a stretch on his facial fat and it would make him look more neotonous.

The problem with standard downward growth is that it causes a convex face and overly long midface that ruins the proportions, along with recessed lower half of the face. Not the case here.

Well you either grow your face forward and to the sides or downwards. This guy has second option and at this point it's over, you can never fix that.

 

[Leforrt3000]

Well you either grow your face forward and to the sides or downwards. This guy has second option and at this point it's over, you can never fix that.

No offense but you're basically mewing coping. Forward growth and facial width are somewhat important but you can have both and still look bad. You can be good looking with a tall face and average forward growth, especially if you make up for it with a forward projected chin.

 

[BigBiceps]

He's just coping. He wishes that's what a chad looked like so he wouldn't feel so ugly himself.

 

[Blackout.xl]

The “normie” would be posting here or on .co

the chad would be a normie at best

the becky is decent

the Stacy is normie

 

[BigBiceps]

The “normie” would be posting here or on .co

the chad would be a normie at best

the becky is decent

the Stacy is normie

That Edmund_Kemper guy is so fucking clueless. Must be below 60 iq.

 

[Over]

No offense but you're basically mewing coping. Forward growth and facial width are somewhat important but you can have both and still look bad. You can be good looking with a tall face and average forward growth, especially if you make up for it with a forward projected chin.

Yes you can look bad. But forward growth and width is only indicator of facial development, you can still get fucked by shitty pheno or genes etc

You can be decent looking to an extend without those two extremely important things. But you can never break a certain barrier. Going deep into looks maybe made me too autistic about analyzing every bone growth in people's faces.

That Edmund_Kemper guy is so fucking clueless. Must be below 60 iq.

Just .co things. That's why I refuse to go there even though I am truecel and belong there.