people who can debate help me out

Jiaxi

Jiaxi

Master
Joined
Nov 13, 2024
Posts
1,712
Reputation
1,915
bit of a story but stick with me:

My English class is doing another debate, and the teacher picked “cancel culture” or “obesity.” To reflect another failure of the American school system, there was no prompt given initially, so the debate planning or thesis is entirely chosen by the loudest most popular person. I am pretty high inhib so it’s difficult to get the words out in class but I took it upon myself and asked the teacher if the class could come up with a topic for debate if we could debate it.

They vetoed a lot of my ideas,

  • Should incest between consenting adults be legalized?
  • Is there ever a justifiable reason for modern-day eugenics?
  • Should certain religions be banned if they promote extremism?
  • Is modern feminism going too far and becoming misandristic?
  • Should parents be allowed to euthanize severely disabled infants?
  • Do women falsely accusing men of assault deserve the same prison sentence as actual offenders?
  • Should racial segregation be allowed if communities voluntarily choose it?
  • Are some cultures inherently superior to others based on progress and development?
  • Should beauty standards for women exist, or is "body positivity" unhealthy?
The only one they fucked with is the second prompt, since two of the foids at my table are aryan and another dude in the group is Christian nationalist.

After I bring up eugenics as a topic of debate the teacher starts tweaking (liberal school you get the idea.) Nonetheless I went to bed listening to Nic Fuentes and woke up fired up for the voting day today. It’s between Eugenics or gene editing being unethical vs Is cancel culture a viable means to deterrence.


TLDR: My final prompt is, “Should eugenics be embraced for human enhancement or condemned as unethical?”
help me out boys I want to shit on the foids in my class who say “muh antisemitism.”
 
  • +1
Reactions: DravidianFootjob, snowbunnypolice, BigJimsWornOutTires and 3 others
@2025cel @WhiteMan @PsychoH
 
  • +1
Reactions: WhiteMan
IMG 8700
 
  • JFL
  • +1
  • So Sad
Reactions: BigJimsWornOutTires, kyphoscoliosis, moggerofhumanity and 2 others
bit of a story but stick with me:

My English class is doing another debate, and the teacher picked “cancel culture” or “obesity.” To reflect another failure of the American school system, there was no prompt given initially, so the debate planning or thesis is entirely chosen by the loudest most popular person. I am pretty high inhib so it’s difficult to get the words out in class but I took it upon myself and asked the teacher if the class could come up with a topic for debate if we could debate it.

They vetoed a lot of my ideas,

  • Should incest between consenting adults be legalized?
  • Is there ever a justifiable reason for modern-day eugenics?
  • Should certain religions be banned if they promote extremism?
  • Is modern feminism going too far and becoming misandristic?
  • Should parents be allowed to euthanize severely disabled infants?
  • Do women falsely accusing men of assault deserve the same prison sentence as actual offenders?
  • Should racial segregation be allowed if communities voluntarily choose it?
  • Are some cultures inherently superior to others based on progress and development?
  • Should beauty standards for women exist, or is "body positivity" unhealthy?
The only one they fucked with is the second prompt, since two of the foids at my table are aryan and another dude in the group is Christian nationalist.

After I bring up eugenics as a topic of debate the teacher starts tweaking (liberal school you get the idea.) Nonetheless I went to bed listening to Nic Fuentes and woke up fired up for the voting day today. It’s between Eugenics or gene editing being unethical vs Is cancel culture a viable means to deterrence.


TLDR: My final prompt is, “Should eugenics be embraced for human enhancement or condemned as unethical?”
help me out boys I want to shit on the foids in my class who say “muh antisemitism.”
Wdym antisemitism?
 
  • +1
Reactions: Jiaxi
Wdym antisemitism?
these retards hear eugenics and immediately think its antisemitic, they just don't want to admit gene editing is based
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: DravidianFootjob, snowbunnypolice, RecessedCels and 2 others
Socratic method. Questions precede an answer. This method can be used to reveal truths to others and to yourself
 
  • +1
Reactions: Jiaxi
Socratic method. Questions precede an answer. This method can be used to reveal truths to others and to yourself
I usually use this but because of how the debate is structured they force us to make a claim first and rebuttal after and all this mundane bs
 
these retards hear eugenics and immediately think its antisemitic, they just don't want to admit gene editing is based
So what does that mean?
Tf, doesn’t connect in any way.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Jiaxi
@WhiteMan @WhiteMan @WhiteMan
@BigJimsWornOutTires
Bloody Mary
 
So what does that mean?
Tf, doesn’t connect in any way.
:lul: I know the debate is on fucking gene editing.:feelskek:
They think im a nazi as soon as this shit starts their going to say,
:soy::soy::soy: Hitler used eugenics so its bad
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: DravidianFootjob and PsychoH
Eugenics is stupid, since all life is worthless.
 
Eugenics is stupid, since all life is worthless.
how is all life worthless? Life is and will always be the most worthy thing
 
  • +1
Reactions: DravidianFootjob and kyphoscoliosis
how is all life worthless? Life is and will always be the most worthy thing
Life is suffering. If a person is never born, they never have to suffer. You aren't doing anyone a favor by giving them life.
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Evgeniy291
Life is suffering. If a person is never born, they never have to suffer. You aren't doing anyone a favor by giving them life.
life is also joy and happiness are you fucking retarded, gene editing is designed to mitigate and eliminate suffering
 
  • Love it
  • +1
Reactions: kyphoscoliosis and Evgeniy291
I usually use this but because of how the debate is structured they force us to make a claim first and rebuttal after and all this mundane bs
I see, so you have to take turns?
 
  • +1
Reactions: Jiaxi
life is also joy and happiness are you fucking retarded, gene editing is designed to mitigate and eliminate suffering
You don't need joy or happiness, if you aren't alive. These are things which allow you to cope with life. Gene editing won't get rid of suffering, since the problems tend to be more so societal. Even then, why are some people more worthy to live than others?
 
You don't need joy or happiness, if you aren't alive. These are things which allow you to cope with life. Gene editing won't get rid of suffering, since the problems tend to be more so societal. Even then, why are some people more worthy to live than others?
It would be from a medical standpoint benefiting the life of those afflicted with health issues, dwarfism, diseases etc. Nobody knows what it’s like to not be alive. It just isn't anything you aren’t anything, I would rather be a shitty something not anything. Life itself is a gift sadly some gifts are better than others and some peoples lives are less of a gift at all. Sickle cell anemia is not societal, and I think life is beautiful there is no need to cope in a naturalistic society.
 
They vetoed a lot of my ideas,

  • Should incest between consenting adults be legalized
CAGED HAHAHA

NO WAY YOU SAID THIS IN CLASS :forcedsmile::forcedsmile::forcedsmile:
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: DravidianFootjob, superpsycho and Jiaxi
It would be from a medical standpoint benefiting the life of those afflicted with health issues, dwarfism, diseases etc. Nobody knows what it’s like to not be alive. It just isn't anything you aren’t anything, I would rather be a shitty something not anything. Life itself is a gift sadly some gifts are better than others and some peoples lives are less of a gift at all. Sickle cell anemia is not societal, and I think life is beautiful there is no need to cope in a naturalistic society.
How can you not comprehend, what it's not like to be alive? It's just the state before you were born.
Life isn't a gift, it's an imposition. There are many societal problems, which cause people to feel unwell. These can't be solved with eugenics.
 
:lul: I know the debate is on fucking gene editing.:feelskek:
They think im a nazi as soon as this shit starts their going to say,
:soy::soy::soy: Hitler used eugenics so its bad
Start off by talking about gene editing and then later on tell them it's considered eugenics
 
  • +1
Reactions: Jiaxi
How can you not comprehend, what it's not like to be alive? It's just the state before you were born.
Life isn't a gift, it's an imposition. There are many societal problems, which cause people to feel unwell. These can't be solved with eugenics.
True eugenics is not a fucking priority at all

The degradation of society in the last few decades is 100% environmental (goy food, media, sexual revolution, ect)

We don't need eugenics lol we need non Jewish leaders :forcedsmile:

Our genes didn't just get worse one day

Autism is not up 1000s of % due to genetics
 
  • +1
Reactions: DravidianFootjob and Jiaxi
life is also joy and happiness are you fucking retarded, gene editing is designed to mitigate and eliminate suffering
JFL. maybe life is joy and happiness for normies.

eugenics is still ultra based regardless tho
 
You don't need joy or happiness, if you aren't alive. These are things which allow you to cope with life. Gene editing won't get rid of suffering, since the problems tend to be more so societal. Even then, why are some people more worthy to live than others?
Couldn't you edit someone's DNA to make them feel happier and respond to stress, suffering and sadness less
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: Jiaxi and Gaygymmaxx
How can you not comprehend, what it's not like to be alive? It's just the state before you were born.
Life isn't a gift, it's an imposition. There are many societal problems, which cause people to feel unwell. These can't be solved with eugenics.
You say “eugenics can’t solve societal problems,” which is true in many ways, but my nigger! the discussion was never about eugenics fixing all of society. The real question is whether scientific advancements (including genetics) could help improve quality of life… not whether life itself is a mistake.
 
Start off by talking about gene editing and then later on tell them it's considered eugenics
Thanks im in the class rn, we’re watching a video on poetry and about to transition into the debate time
 
  • +1
Reactions: RecessedCels
Couldn't you edit someone's DNA to make them feel happier and respond to stress, suffering and sadness less
The recent wave of depression and mental illness is not about genes. Not even a little bit.

Your mother and fathers mental profile and proficiency to create dopamine and serotonin

Is not why you're depressed.

You're depressed because you were born in the 2000s/ ugly / (would normal in 1950)

And the soy snd goy literally making men feminine physically/ culture as well

A man who grows up with women has a extremely high chance of being gay or extemely feminine

It's everywhere, fag culture is mainstream

Totally makes sense that the rate of gays is super high

Gays didn't explode in frequency due to more freedom,

They aren't coming out just because it's acceptable

There are instead more gays occurring. At a extreme rate

1 in 36 babies are autistic, up from 1/1000s in the 1900s

Eugenics is not even what's needed. Not at all.
 
Last edited:
  • +1
Reactions: Jiaxi
The recent wave of depression and mental illness is not about genes. Not even a little bit.
First sentence waffling about some random shit. DNR:lul:
 
  • +1
Reactions: superpsycho
why are normies so against eugenics honestly.

would stop subhumans like me from existing.
 
  • +1
Reactions: DravidianFootjob and Jiaxi
Don't
Too risky
They would be quick to label you
Be careful
 
  • +1
Reactions: Jiaxi and superpsycho
We don't need eugenics lol we need non Jewish leaders :forcedsmile:
"non Jewish leaders" :feelsuhh:
The problem is the rich that exploits the working class for their personal gains. Not only are the jews doing this, but there are plenty of rich Irish, German, etc. people who have no problem in exploiting their own people. This "goyslop" you're speaking of, is what jews feed their own people aswell.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Jiaxi and superpsycho
"non Jewish leaders" :feelsuhh:
I don't mean literally, although yes a larger portion of jews will fill this role

when i say "muh jews" i am talking about this:
The problem is the rich that exploits the
working class for their personal gains.
Yes.
 
  • +1
Reactions: superpsycho
:lul: I know the debate is on fucking gene editing.:feelskek:
They think im a nazi as soon as this shit starts their going to say,
:soy::soy::soy: Hitler used eugenics so its bad
jews dont want your kids to ascend to gandhi heaven.
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: Jiaxi and Gaygymmaxx
"non Jewish leaders" :feelsuhh:
The problem is the rich that exploits the working class for their personal gains. Not only are the jews doing this, but there are plenty of rich Irish, German, etc. people who have no problem in exploiting their own people. This "goyslop" you're speaking of, is what jews feed their own people aswell.
fuck the rich honestly

i want welfare neetbux by 20 fuck wageslaving
 
  • +1
Reactions: Jiaxi, Smirky and Gaygymmaxx
First sentence waffling about some random shit. DNR:lul:
Low iq I made total sense with examples and evidence

And yes it's absolutely true,

Your perspective is totally based on YOUR PERSPECTIVE

You get it?

The blackpill is societal, not genetic

It wasn't like this 50 years ago, and irs not because everybody was chad

it's due to DIFFERENT CULTURE

As genetics are not the problem here, I wouldn't solve the problem by altering genes
 
  • +1
Reactions: Jiaxi
Life is suffering. If a person is never born, they never have to suffer. You aren't doing anyone a favor by giving them life.
You're suffering from psychotic depression. You know that right?
 
  • +1
Reactions: Jiaxi
Low iq I made total sense with examples and evidence

And yes it's absolutely true,

Your perspective is totally based on YOUR PERSPECTIVE

You get it?

The blackpill is societal, not genetic

It wasn't like this 50 years ago, and irs not because everybody was chad

it's due to DIFFERENT CULTURE

As genetics are not the problem here, I wouldn't solve the problem by altering genes
You're once again talking about something I never even mentioned :lul:

DNR
 
  • +1
Reactions: Jiaxi
You're suffering from psychotic depression. You know that right?
Lol how is he? That's a truth you cannot deny. No mind = no suffering. Just because someone has different views doesn't mean they're in a psychosis :lul:
 
  • +1
Reactions: Jiaxi
Don't
Too risky
They would be quick to label you
Be careful
especially if hes not a minority. he will get called racist INSTANTLY.
 
  • +1
Reactions: WhiteMan and Jiaxi
Lol how is he? That's a truth you cannot deny. No mind = no suffering. Just because someone has different views doesn't mean they're in a psychosis :lul:
Because he's implying that it would be better if life didn't exist. It's a delusion born out of nihilism and a sense of helplessness, not reality.
 
  • Hmm...
  • +1
Reactions: Jiaxi and RecessedCels
Because he's implying that it would be better if life didn't exist. It's a delusion born out of nihilism and a sense of helplessness, not reality.
I believe that too. There is no way to prove it disprove it. It's completely subjective
 
  • +1
Reactions: Jiaxi
I believe that too. There is no way to prove it disprove it. It's completely subjective
The reality is that life is inevitable, like all things. To think otherwise is a fantasy
 
  • +1
Reactions: Jiaxi
The reality is that life is inevitable, like all things. To think otherwise is a fantasy
Believing life shouldn't exist is different than believing we could somehow prevent it
 
  • +1
Reactions: Jiaxi
why are normies so against eugenics honestly.

would stop subhumans like me from existing.
actually i have change of opinion

if eugenics was the norm then more and more people would be good looking, hence standards skyrocketing and most good looking people would just be considered average in society. for there to be people who are good looking, there needs to be ugly. and im one of the ugly ones :feelswhy:

i still think eugenics is really based either way for wiping out hereditary/genetic disorders, normies arent ready for that discussion tho
 
  • +1
Reactions: Jiaxi and Gaygymmaxx
Believing life shouldn't exist is different than believing we could somehow prevent it
Man was made in God's image

I'm not a Bible thumper but I think this is very important

What do humans do? Seek novelty, look for fun,

Dopamine from advantageous activities provides us with satisfaction

Humans are satisfaction seeking machines. There have always been drug addicts. And always those who gain satisfaction from success

Both are extracting novelty from the body they were placed in

God is a novelty farmer, 8 million crops innit

The most efficient way to farm novelty was to split himself into a simulation

He was alone, and immersed himself in fun machine,

Like video games,

God's image, he made us, we make video games

It's kind of a boring theory and I don't really like it but it seems very reasonable
 
  • +1
Reactions: superpsycho
actually i have change of opinion

if eugenics was the norm then more and more people would be good looking, hence standards skyrocketing and most good looking people would just be considered average in society. for there to be people who are good looking, there needs to be ugly. and im one of the ugly ones :feelswhy:

i still think eugenics is really based either way for wiping out hereditary/genetic disorders, normies arent ready for that discussion tho
I think to myself

"I'm 5"6, if I had a kid, his mom would be like 5"3 because im not a tree climber,

I can't do that to my son"


And yet niggers with actual chronic disease will spread the pain like true monsters

Nah in that regard eugenics is very valid

But also think about the value of subhumanity

Many depressed genius intellectuals were forced to compensate with intellectual accomplishments because they could not be social winners

They had to find their own way to win

When everybody is the same we lose the paths to victory, they all become the same

I don't really think eugenics is necessary at all

And as an incel on this forum you're misdiagnosising the problem

In the 1950s, there was no blackpill, it existed but it wasn't so bad

The reason you're an incel now, and not before

IS not because you're "more subhuman"

It's because of social media and porn and shit,

It's not even more competition

It's more perceived competition
 
  • +1
Reactions: superpsycho

Similar threads

D
Replies
16
Views
228
Deleted member 125665
D
shredded4summer
Replies
20
Views
519
500
500
Sloppyseconds
Replies
12
Views
646
the_nextDavidLaid
the_nextDavidLaid
D
Replies
15
Views
609
1nonlymogs
1nonlymogs

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top