[POLL] WOULD YOU RATHER Be a BIMAX Candidate or a Ramus-cel? | Blender 3D Visualizations

[thecel]

Poll

---

I made a Blender 3D head model to visualize human facial variations.

In this comparison are:

(a) a guy who’s recessed, downward-grown, and downswung. He’s a textbook bimax candidate. But at least he has well-developed, tall, vertical, masculine rami and broad, masculine bigonial breadth.

(b) a guy who has optimal forward growth, but has a dogshit ramus. He has what WW calls a “narrowing lower third”. His gonial angle is undefined. His rami are invisible to the naked eye.

Who would you rather look like?

---

Bimax Candidate with Well-Developed Ramus

---

Ramus-cel with Optimal Forward Growth

---

Previous Thread in the Series
[POLL] Bonemogger Chinlet VERSUS Boneless Chinmogger | Blender 3D Visualizations Poll A visualization of facial features with a Blender 3D head model. Mogger Bone Structure but Recessed Chin Boneless Bone Structure but Chad Chin Previous Thread in the Series... looksmax.org

 

[PsychoH]

Easily the first.

 

[Mosh12]

First one is easier to fix

 

[PsychoH]

also very nice visualizations you make.

 

[thecel]

First one is easier to fix

Really? Doesn’t the 2nd one just need a wraparound jaw implant and he’s good to go?

He doesn’t need osteotomies. Whereas the 1st guy needs bimax.

 

[Mosh12]

Really? Doesn’t the 2nd one just need a wraparound jaw implant and he’s good to go? He doesn’t need osteotomies. Whereas the 1st guy needs bimax.

Good point. Idk the first one just looks better. It doesn’t seem like he needs as much surgery

 

[ryuken]

Shadows conceal truths.

 

[Sub5kang]

Poll

---

I made a Blender 3D head model to visualize human facial variations.

In this comparison are:

(a) a guy who’s recessed, downward-grown, and downswung. He’s a textbook bimax candidate. But at least he has well-developed, tall, vertical, masculine rami and broad, masculine bigonial breadth.

(b) a guy who has optimal forward growth, but has a dogshit ramus. He has what WW calls a “narrowing lower third”. His gonial angle is undefined. His rami are invisible to the naked eye.

Who would you rather look like?

---

Bimax Candidate with Well-Developed Ramus

View attachment 3340123

---

Ramus-cel with Optimal Forward Growth

View attachment 3340124

---

Previous Thread in the Series
[POLL] Bonemogger Chinlet VERSUS Boneless Chinmogger | Blender 3D Visualizations Poll A visualization of facial features with a Blender 3D head model. Mogger Bone Structure but Recessed Chin Boneless Bone Structure but Chad Chin Previous Thread in the Series... looksmax.org

Easy choice really but at the end of the day I'm not Jordan Kale Barett so does it really matter?

 

[thecel]

bumo

 

[Deleted member 88173]

Poll

---

I made a Blender 3D head model to visualize human facial variations.

In this comparison are:

(a) a guy who’s recessed, downward-grown, and downswung. He’s a textbook bimax candidate. But at least he has well-developed, tall, vertical, masculine rami and broad, masculine bigonial breadth.

(b) a guy who has optimal forward growth, but has a dogshit ramus. He has what WW calls a “narrowing lower third”. His gonial angle is undefined. His rami are invisible to the naked eye.

Who would you rather look like?

---

Bimax Candidate with Well-Developed Ramus

View attachment 3340123

---

Ramus-cel with Optimal Forward Growth

View attachment 3340124

---

Previous Thread in the Series
[POLL] Bonemogger Chinlet VERSUS Boneless Chinmogger | Blender 3D Visualizations Poll A visualization of facial features with a Blender 3D head model. Mogger Bone Structure but Recessed Chin Boneless Bone Structure but Chad Chin Previous Thread in the Series... looksmax.org

Good thing I have both tall ramus and decent forward growth.

 

[Deleted member 88173]

Easily the first.

Good forward growth with no ramus ,
Literally makes one look like a dog

 

[zemult]

What about optimal forward growth, tall but narrow ramus in comparison to zygos?

 

[axttt_]

Really? Doesn’t the 2nd one just need a wraparound jaw implant and he’s good to go?

View attachment 3340126

He doesn’t need osteotomies. Whereas the 1st guy needs bimax.

osteotomy mogs implants though

 

[yinedegel]

Poll

---

I made a Blender 3D head model to visualize human facial variations.

In this comparison are:

(a) a guy who’s recessed, downward-grown, and downswung. He’s a textbook bimax candidate. But at least he has well-developed, tall, vertical, masculine rami and broad, masculine bigonial breadth.

(b) a guy who has optimal forward growth, but has a dogshit ramus. He has what WW calls a “narrowing lower third”. His gonial angle is undefined. His rami are invisible to the naked eye.

Who would you rather look like?

---

Bimax Candidate with Well-Developed Ramus

View attachment 3340123

---

Ramus-cel with Optimal Forward Growth

View attachment 3340124

---

Previous Thread in the Series
[POLL] Bonemogger Chinlet VERSUS Boneless Chinmogger | Blender 3D Visualizations Poll A visualization of facial features with a Blender 3D head model. Mogger Bone Structure but Recessed Chin Boneless Bone Structure but Chad Chin Previous Thread in the Series... looksmax.org

Short ramus and low GA=sfs And thats a really bad lmao. Tall ramus and recessed better

 

[silently_said]

1st one looks like a roman statue